Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mx flower01.jpg

File:Mx flower01.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2010 at 17:29:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Mx flower01.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mx flower01.jpg

•  Info created by Cvmontuy - uploaded by Cvmontuy - nominated by Cvmontuy -- Cvmontuy (talk) 17:29, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Support -- Cvmontuy (talk) 17:29, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose - Poor lighting (built-in flash usually gives very reflective, flat lighting, unless used correctly as fill flash). LeavXC (talk) 18:29, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the feedback, --Cvmontuy (talk) 18:54, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

•  Oppose Per LeavXC. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 23:25, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Lighting, composition, FPX ? --Elekhh (talk) 05:55, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Neutral If someone good at channels can lighten up the BG, I might consider {{support}}-ing. It's a bit distracting. --IdLoveOne (talk) 03:27, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
•  OpposeSorry. We have in "Commons" a very nice gallery of featured flowers and plants, and as a non specialist, I may say that this one is really far from usual FP standards I'm afraid. Only a small part is in focus, the light is very bad, I don't understand the composition. I do not how to use the FPX template (a tool I dislike), but...--Jebulon (talk) 16:08, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: Not much is in focus, the flash light is very bad, and the composition is not good. --Slaunger (talk) 14:52, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.