Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Petrópolis, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 0188 04.jpg

File:Petrópolis, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 0188 04.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Oct 2023 at 12:00:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Petrópolis, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 0188 04.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Petrópolis, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 0188 04.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Brazil
•  Info Churrascaria Majórica in Petrópolis, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. A churrascaria is a place where meat is cooked in churrasco style, which translates roughly from the Portuguese word for "barbecue". Churrascaria cuisine is typically (but not always) served rodízio style, where roving waiters serve the barbecued meats from large skewers directly onto the seated diners' plates. Created and uploaded by Wilfredor - nominated by ★ -- ★ 12:00, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
•  Support -- ★ 12:00, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 15:17, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose blurred objects like lamp shade and glasses at bottom plus strong CA around rim of lamp shade are just the main shortcomings spotted on first glance; Sorry but this is not a FP from my point of view --Virtual-Pano (talk) 20:57, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

 Done Please Virtual-Pano, let me know if its ok for you. Thanks --Wilfredor (talk) 21:35, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

Quite an improvement with the bottom glasses cropped, not so sure if the lamp shade treatment is the way to go.
Additionally there are flaws like the washed out look of the wooden beams, the blury faucet, the the slanted stainless steel countertop on the left to name just a few.
Not a FP for me sorry Virtual-Pano (talk) 21:50, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

I deeply appreciate your insights and the time you've taken to review the picture. Feedback is always invaluable, allowing us to consider various perspectives and make improvements and improve my professional quality. After careful consideration of the proposed corrections, I've decided not to implement them at this time. The main reason is that I see these colors as natural and genuine. My intention is to preserve the essence and authenticity of the work. I understand that, as with any edit in any picture, there is always room for changes and enhancements, and everyone might have a different view on what the final outcome should be. If I were to make these corrections, it's likely that new observations would emerge, continuing the cycle of feedback. Thank you for understanding, and I value our ongoing comments in FPC. --Wilfredor (talk) 00:46, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

•  I withdraw my nomination Nomination becoming an useless forum. ★ 02:29, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

post withdrawal votes

Support I like it. Tomer T (talk) 08:49, 8 October 2023 (UTC)  Support --Wilfredor (talk) 10:00, 8 October 2023 (UTC)  Support, I simply don’t care if uploader has withdrawn. RodRabelo7 (talk) 02:28, 9 October 2023 (UTC)  Support I like it, too. ArionStar, you withdraw nominations way too quickly, before it's clear that more than one or two people have problems with a nomination. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:49, 9 October 2023 (UTC)  Comment This nomination has been withdrawn yesterday. I don't think supports should be tolerated after a candidature has been withdrawn, for 2 reasons: 1. because we would not accept oppose votes in the same situation. 2. because only two nominations are allowed per user, not three, not 2.5. It's the nominator's responsibility to manage their own nominations from the beginning to the end. And to respect the quota defined in the guidelines. Other participants may take over the nomination if they want. Also a photo can always be renominated later. Thank you -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:07, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Basile Morin (talk) 00:57, 10 October 2023 (UTC)