Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Podzim na Kašperku.jpg

File:Podzim na Kašperku.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Dec 2014 at 13:45:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Podzim na Kašperku.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Podzim na Kašperku.jpg

•  Info created by Jiří Strašek - uploaded by Jiří Strašek - nominated by Jklamo -- Jklamo (talk) 13:45, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Support -- Jklamo (talk) 13:45, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Pudelek (talk) 14:20, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Pity! What a great idea, lighting and composition – but not sharp enough for an FP of only 6 mpix. I suspect camera shake (vertical blur). --Kreuzschnabel 15:50, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment - Please remove the several dust spots in the sky and correct the ccw tilt of the building. Alvesgaspar (talk) 19:19, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Support--polar123 (talk) 08:05, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose I agree with Kreuzschnabel. Some dustspots to be removed. Too small.--Jebulon (talk) 15:31, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose I don't see any shake; I think the sharpness is typical of a DX kit lens. My main concern is the areas of pure black. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:44, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Support nice colors, good composition.  Comment: only 2MP are for an image needed. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 14:02, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
  • nothing else for support argumentation ? Yes only 2mpx are needed, but I think that for such a landscape, a higher size should help. To disagree with this (your absolute right) is not enough for support.--Jebulon (talk) 22:40, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
    • I addad some other arguments :-) --Alchemist-hp (talk) 22:51, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Prefer File:Podzimní panorama Kašperka.jpg (though that is tilted). The scene is good but too much tree and not enough sky. And technical quality is weak as noted above. -- Colin (talk) 19:54, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 14:21, 29 December 2014 (UTC)