Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:President's Summer home, Rio Negro Palace, Petrópolis, Rio de Janeiro.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:President's Summer home, Rio Negro Palace, Petrópolis, Rio de Janeiro.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Oct 2016 at 01:07:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications
Info President's Summer home, The Palácio Rio Negro (English: Rio Negro Palace) is a palace located in Petrópolis, in the state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. All by -- The Photographer 01:07, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Support -- The Photographer 01:07, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Oppose - Weird light, not very sharp and several dust spots just above the building toward the left. I'd love to see a similar motif with more sharpness in better light, maybe with a tighter right margin to eliminate the partial inclusion of some uninteresting buildings. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:10, 28 September 2016 (UTC)- Oppose Unsharpness especially in lower left and lower right; I feel like standards have risen to the point where a standard centered architectural shot will either need a really good lens or panorama stitching. I disagree with Ikan on the lighting though, I think the cloudy day is great for bringing out the beautiful colors of the building and grass without worrying about shadows. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:11, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, far from being sharp enough, leaning to the right (at least it seems so to me) and the light's not pleasing. --Code (talk) 07:26, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Per unsharpness at depth (look at the areas to the sides of the building) and slight tilt noted by Code. Although I wasn't bothered by the light—for a light-colored building like this, it may have been a good idea. Support now that those concerns have been addressed. Daniel Case (talk) 20:31, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
- Info Thanks for the reviews, I did the follow changes:
Done Sharpening and composition (with another picture of the same section) in corners and dust spots. @Ikan Kekek: - Done I cut the border to eliminate the partial inclusion of some uninteresting buildings.
- Done Leaning to the right fix. Thanks @Code: @Daniel Case:
- This picture was done on a travel to Petropolis, Brazil and this picture was taken using tripod. Anyway I hope had improved the picture, thanks again --The Photographer 22:48, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Comment - You improved the composition, but it still isn't up to FP level to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:15, 29 September 2016 (UTC)- Support Albertus teolog (talk) 19:02, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Thanks for the reviews and votes positives and not (well docummented). Maybe it's a combination of 10 years old camera and low quality lens --The Photographer 12:12, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /INeverCry 19:18, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
