Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tarentola mauritanica Calabria.JPG

File:Tarentola mauritanica Calabria.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Sep 2010 at 12:30:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Tarentola mauritanica Calabria.JPG Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tarentola mauritanica Calabria.JPG

•  Info created by Mystère Martin - uploaded by Mystère Martin - nominated by Mystère Martin -- Mystère Martin (talk) 12:30, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Support -- Mystère Martin (talk) 12:30, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose compostion, situation, dof, only one side of the head and one foot is visible --mathias K 14:07, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, composition is not fixable here. Have the same view as Mathias. --Korman (talk) 06:36, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 12:18, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per above. --Nevit Dilmen (talk) 14:01, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
  •  Comment What does not fit in the composition? What does not fit in the situation? What does not fit in the depth of field (or depth of focus?)? Why only one side of the head and foot are not well? I don't understand...--Mystère Martin (talk) 09:15, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Спас Колев (talk) 08:33, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Support because of the composition --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 17:08, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
•  OpposeNo scientific interest, poor quality photography depth of field too low.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:17, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
  •  CommentThe low DOF is a desired effect. Why is it not well? --Mystère Martin (talk) 11:48, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:10, 5 September 2010 (UTC)