User talk:Nevit
From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
|
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Български | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | English | Ελληνικά | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | Hrvatski | हिन्दी | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | Latina | Lietuvių | 日本語 | 한국어 | Magyar | Македонски | मराठी | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk (bokmål) | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Scots | Shqip | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / Srpski | Suomi | Svenska | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | Vèneto | 中文 | 中文(繁體) | +/− |
 First steps tutorialOur first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy.  Getting helpMore information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
 Goodies, tips and tricks
 Made a mistake?
|
|
| (P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) | ||
[edit] DR
User_talk:Nevit/Deletion_requests
[edit] Aquariology categories
Hi, Nevit
I see your category changes in aquarium and aquarium fish categories. You put the categories "freswater aquarium fishes" and "marine aquarium fishes" in several categories, and in several articles like Aquarium and Trichogaster trichopterus. I I did the same at first, when I create the categories, but it was an error (according to the administrators).
When I created that categories, I include articles and categories in the main Category:Aquariology. All the categories and articles included in acuariology category are linked across the subcategories. If one image is in "Amphiprion sebae", no is necessary include the image in the "marine aquarium fishes", because the category "Amphiprion sebae" is here.
Example: I included Trichogaster trichopterus in the new Category:Trichogaster trichopterus, and that category is included in Category:Freshwater aquarium fishes. If the specific category (Trichogaster trichopterus) is included in the other category (freswater aquarium fishes), it is not necessary to include. Because is a category, no a navigation bar.
I see that you add Actinopterygii to freshwater and marine aquarium fishes categorys... No, please. Not all the Actinopterygii are aquarium fishes. Please, speak with me to coordinate the job.
Excuse for my poor english (please, take all the text in friendly language, perhaps my english is a little sudden). Greetings, --Pristigaster 11:42, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
I am glad that the comment was useful (and with my bad english! je je). The categorys and articles are a problem in Wikimedia. Three comments:
- The Gallerys: You was creating gallerys in the articles or the categorys, but if you mark the photo in the correct category, the wikisoftware generates a gallery automatically, without work. Oh, I see that you undertand this: In Category:Hemigrammus erythrozonus you work in a galler y, and the wikisoftware generate the gallery (when I mark the images in the category). I see that you delete the gallery (there was two). OK!
- The Tree of Categories: In the images, articles and categories, in wikipedia and wikimedia the correct category is the low. If two categories are connected, only one is "correct" (according to the community), the lower. Example: in the article Trichogaster trichopterus, I I created the Category:Trichogaster trichopterus, category connected with Category:Osphronemidae, and Category:Freshwater aquarium fishes. You add Category:Freshwater aquarium fishes to the article: the article appears two times in two categories connected directly; is unnecesary, no?
- The specific Categories: Example: The article Aquarium is a general article about aquariums (or it it should be). I personally would create it inside the category page Aquariology, with a small text, and making use of the subcategories and the automatic galleries, but is my opinion (because for articles is the wikipedia). mmm... You add other categories linkin to Aquariology, Freshwater aquarium fishes, Marine aquarium fishes..... etc. The article is in the specific category, but in other three inespecific connected directly to the especific category.
I look your Category:Freshwater plants, good work! (and hard, you constructed the gallery manually). Greetings, --Pristigaster 10:51, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
Thankyou Pristigaster, I learned new things from you. Nevit 16:37, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] :-)
Hi! cool animations! what program did you use? 217.36.120.131
[edit] GIMP
[edit] FP Candidates
I've nominated a couple of your images for Featured Picture status.
 |
The image Image:Egg-512364.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Egg-512364.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
 |
The image Image:Lightning 02890-200208.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Lightning 02890-200208.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
--MichaelMaggs 21:34, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] good pictures with noise
Hi Nevit, I like your pictures a lot. Image:Tema Nezahat Gokyigit Park 05204-a.jpg is one of my favourite. The only thing that prevents me from nominating it as Quality images is that there are strong colour aberrations around the buildings and there is noise in the sky. It would be quite easy to remove this before the hdr conversion is done. Afterwards it's much more difficult. --Ikiwaner 17:31, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Da Vinci Parachute
Nice picture. Seeing that it looks like a Museum exhibition piece, you may want to note on the page where and when you took the picture. Cheers, MadMaxDog
[edit] Personal image galleries
Hello there. Some of your images / image galleries appear to be large personal art galleries. While the Commons welcomes free images, the stated scope of the project specifically states that "files uploaded to the Commons have to be useful for some Wikimedia project" and "[p]rivate image collections and the like are generally not wanted. Wikimedia Commons is not a web host for e.g. ... self-created artwork without educational purpose"
More specifically, I'm mostly concerned about User:Nevit/Animations, User:Nevit/Digital_workshop and User:Nevit/Gimpressionist, which do not seem to serve an educational purpose. Other websites, such as DeviantArt are better suited to personal image galleries. It would be appreciated if you could do something with any images you've uploaded that are non-educational, such as filing a deletion request for them.
Thanks, and keep up the good work. Consumed Crustacean 13:41, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Wikinews Photo
Hey!
Can you take a quick look at User:Symode09/Wikinews, if you can help, I would really appreciate it
Symode09 16:51, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
This message has been sent to around 25 people
[edit] Wikinews Images
Thanks for your help, they are just the sort of thing I'm looking for!
--talk to symode09's or Spread the love! 01:05, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Flower 05644.JPG
The name is Phedimus spurius.
[edit] Proposal concerning User PH-n templates
Hi, there is a proposal and vote concerning the {{User PH-0}},...,{{User PH-3}} templates, that you may be interested in. --Tony Wills 10:59, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Geometrical toys
Hi, I just deleted the gallerypage for "Geometrical toys" as it was empty. Please feel free to recreate if there are images to fill the page :). Kind regards, Deadstar (msg) 09:43, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Swimming images
Hi Nevit,
The images from the book Amuzesh-e Shena you uploaded cannot be PD in Iran. This license applies to photographs and films, and lasts for 30 years (so before 1977). The images you uploaded dates back from 1982. I'm going to ask an admin for deletion. Please be careful with the license next time. Fabienkhan 11:32, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Quality Image Promotion
 |
Congratulations! Image Image:Lamb 09807-a.jpg, which was nominated by you for Quality Image status, was reviewed and has now been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. |
--Ikiwaner 21:16, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
 |
Congratulations! Image Image:Lactarius salmonicolor dsc05255 nevit.jpg, which was nominated by you for Quality Image status, was reviewed and has now been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. |
--Ikiwaner 17:31, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
 |
Congratulations! Image Image:Kids 09185.JPG, which was nominated by you for Quality Image status, was reviewed and has now been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. |
 |
Congratulations! Image Image:Cunda church 07832.jpg, which was nominated by you for Quality Image status, was reviewed and has now been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. |
 |
Congratulations! Image Image:Karagoz theatre 06315.JPG, which was nominated by you for Quality Image status, was reviewed and has now been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. |
 |
Congratulations! Image Image:Offroad Jeep 05760 2.jpg, which was nominated by you for Quality Image status, was reviewed and has now been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. |
 |
Congratulations! Image Image:Bolu-08523 nevit.jpg, which was nominated by you for Quality Image status, was reviewed and has now been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. |
 |
Congratulations! Image Image:Plastic Protractor Polarized 05375.jpg, which was nominated by you for Quality Image status, was reviewed and has now been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. |
 |
Congratulations! Image Image:Grape 00005.jpg, which was nominated by you for Quality Image status, was reviewed and has now been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. |
 |
Congratulations! Image Image:Rope-03235.JPG, which was nominated by you for Quality Image status, was reviewed and has now been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. |
 |
Congratulations! Image Image:Usm-unsharp-mask.png, which was nominated by you for Quality Image status, was reviewed and has now been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. |
 |
Congratulations! Image Image:Wind-09929-fm.jpg, which was nominated by you for Quality Image status, was reviewed and has now been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. |
 |
Congratulations! Image Image:Beyoglu_4419_01x.jpg, which was nominated by you for Quality Image status, was reviewed and has now been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. |
 |
Congratulations! Image Image:Beyoglu 5994 01x.jpg, which was nominated by you for Quality Image status, was reviewed and has now been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. |
 |
Congratulations! Image Image:Goose_07274.jpg, which was nominated by you for Quality Image status, was reviewed and has now been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. |
 |
Congratulations! Image Image:Mardin P1030274 20080423101837.JPG, which was nominated by you for Quality Image status, was reviewed and has now been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. |
 |
Congratulations! Image Image:Chimera Fire 00279 nevit.jpg, which was nominated by you for Quality Image status, was reviewed and has now been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. |
 |
Congratulations! Image Image:Book 06490 20040730160049 L.jpg, which was nominated by you for Quality Image status, was reviewed and has now been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. |
[edit] Image:Fur_skirt.jpg
Thanks for the fine picture and for your help! [1]--Kuerschner 06:02, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Darica Piranha 03037.jpg
Hi, Nevit, I comitted an error in the Piranha photo, I forget two categories... (in the cut and paste... I remove it). Thanks to correct my error. Long time that did not watch your photos, and since then you have upload many and great photos. Congratulations! Great work! Regards, --Pristigaster 09:25, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Index of ftp://ftp.gimp.org/pub/gimp/contrib/
Is this you ftp://ftp.gimp.org/pub/gimp/contrib/gimp-nevit-*? Active on egroups gimpi, if I remember correctly....
I have been trying to sort through the bogus information and the real lately. It is a challenge. One example, they planted a letter on google groups that says that gimp .54 copied layers from photoshop. The rumor I heard way back when was that photoshop copied the layers dialog from gimp. The letter is obviously bogus and all of the rest of it are rumors to me because almost every windows box I saw back then had that free version of Paint Shop Pro installed on it; the one that announced how long it had been installed without a registration by counting the days in the opening dialog before it would start. -- carol 01:23, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Nerden
Nerden yaziyosun bu mesajlari anlamadimki gecenin bu saatinde bana yer arattiriyosun hoca --ufukozkan 02:04, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
Bilgisayardan :)))) --Nevit Dilmen 21:30, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Category:Istanbul Archaeological Museum
hello there,
you have been actively participating in the Category:Istanbul Archaeological Museum. I checked the English version, and it seems though that the English Wiki name is "Istanbul Archaeology Museum" [2]. Which one is the correct one, because either the English Wiki or the Commons name should be corrected in that case so that they are in synch. Thank you. Gryffindor 09:45, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
- Since I am getting more and more conflicting information now, I think it best we funnel the proposal on the talk page here [3]. Gryffindor 18:27, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
- Consensus seems to be approaching, your final input is welcome. Gryffindor 20:14, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Valued images evaluation
Dear Nevit,
This is a standard message to the 18 different users who so far have been involved in testing Valued images candidates as either a nominator, reviewer or project editor. We are interested in hearing what you think about the project and what your positive and negative experiences have been. We would be grateful if you would voice your opinion here. Thank you,
-- Slaunger 19:48, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Kategori değişikliği
Bu değişikliğiniz doğru değil, çünkü resimdeki çeşme Uludağ'da. Kategori değişikliğinizi geri aldım. tr:Kullanıcı:Mskyrider
[edit] Antoin Sevruguin images
I see you have uploaded a number of copies of Sevruguin's images from the Smithsonian Institution.
- They have borders that I am happy to remove (if other issues can be sorted).
- The images have a watermark - not easily removed.
- SI images are copyright with "free use".[4] If you can demonstrate wiki is acceptable, SI site specifies a preferred citation method (from http://www.asia.si.edu/archives/finding_aids/sevruguin.html):
To cite images in Series 1, Myron Bement Smith Collection, please use:
- Myron Bement Smith Collection. Freer Gallery of Art and Arthur M. Sackler Gallery Archives. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. Gift of Katharine Dennis Smith, 1973-1985. Photographer: Antoin Sevruguin, negative number [when appropriate.]
To cite images in Series 2, Antoin Sevruguin Photographs, please use:
- Antoin Sevruguin Photographs. Freer Gallery of Art and Arthur M. Sackler Gallery Archives. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. Gift of Jay Bisno.
If you to sort detailed descriptions and permissions, I will deal with the borders. Finavon 20:46, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
- (discussion continued at User talk:Finavon#AS)
[edit] Question
Hi Nevit, I wonder what exactly you've pictured there. Is it an old mysterious window? ;-) Anyway, could you please add a better description to the image information page? Many thanks (not only for this, but for all your good images, btw) --Überraschungsbilder 01:28, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Mardin P1030274 20080423101837.JPG
Building on the picture is tilted about 0.4° CW, could you fix this? Or, if you want, I can do this for you. --Leafnode 20:30, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
- Rotated. Check if it's ok :) --Leafnode 21:00, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Fill flashing
Hi, I've fill-flashed my image. Care to have another look? Lycaon 15:44, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] More informative description for Safranbolu-photos needed
Hi Nevit,
the description of most or all of your nice images from Safranbolu is only "Photographs from Safranbolu". Could you add instead information what is actually shown in the picture? Thanks. --Túrelio 20:39, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
-
- The city of Safranbolu (itself) is a world heritage site. The buildings, streets and lifestyle is to be protected. Images show status at 2007. More info can be added by users. The only keyword needed is Safranbolu. --Nevit Dilmen 21:11, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Help needed with the Valued images project
As you may have seen, this project is going live for nominations on 1 June, 2008 at 0:00 UTC. Before then, there are a few things to be finished off, and any help you can give will be welcome. The latest discussion is at Commons talk:Valued images candidates#Open action items for Valued images.
When the project launches publicly on 1 June, it will need reviewers who are able to jump in quickly and provide prompt feedback. During those critical first few weeks it will be important to have a decent number of reviewers who are prepared to put in the effort to make sure the first nominations are well-reviewed, as that will set the standard for the future.
Would you help, please, with the final tasks now, and also pledge your help with some reviewing on 1 June and thereafter? --MichaelMaggs 17:08, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] FP promotion
|
|
The image Image:Rope-03235.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Rope-03235.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
Alvesgaspar 23:34, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Noise profiles
Hi,
I downloaded noise profiles for Nikon D70 from neatimage.com, and obtained four dozens of *.dnp files. If I take a ISO400 picture exemple, here are my different choices. Where do I have to put these *.dnp files ? I didn't find the right menu in Capture NX, and neither in Photoshop...
- D70-PreWB-JPEG L-Sharp ML-Normal Curve - NIKON D70 (ISO400; 4bpp; SharpSoft; 3008x2000; WB Default; 1by13s).dnp
- D70-PreWB-JPEG L-Sharp ML-P&S 4.1 Curve - NIKON D70 (ISO400; 4bpp; SharpSoft; 3008x2000; WB Default; 1by13s).dnp
- D70-PreWB-RAW NC 4.2-Sharp ML-Normal Curve - NIKON D70 (ISO400; Uncompressed; 3008x2000; WB Default; 1by13s).dnp
- D70-PreWB-RAW NC 4.2-Sharp ML-P&S 4.1 Curve - NIKON D70 (ISO400; Uncompressed; 3008x2000; WB Default; 1by13s).dnp
Thanks, --Romanceor [parlons-en] 12:18, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Valued images test review phase has ended
|
Dear Nevit, Thank you for participating in the development of the Valued images project by test nominating one or more candidates. We have used the input from the test reviews to fine-tune the guidelines, process and templates used, hereby hopefully improving the setup. We have now decided that on June 1, 2008 at 0:00 (UTC), the valued image project will be opened for official nominations. To get ready for the grand opening, we will close down the last remaining open test candidates in a few hours, such that the candidates list pages are emptied and ready. Since there has been a certain amount of instruction creep over the course of the test review pahse, we have decided that all promoted and declined candidates from the test review phase will be reset to the so-called "undecided" state prior to the opening. This means that test valued image candidate review pages all end up in Category:Undecided valued images candidates and the test sets end up in Category:Undecided valued image set candidates. The votes from the original test review will be archived in a previous reviews subpage and reset upon renomination. Although all nominations will be reset, you, as a test nominator, will still have the advantage that each candidate can be re-nominated beginning June 1 0:00 UTC. The votes from the original test review will be archived in a previous reviews subpage and reset upon renomination. Click on the links to the aforementioned categories for instruction on how to renominate. In addition, the project has decided to re-nominate all candidates, which were test promoted, unless you tell us not to do so on my talk page. Also, do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or problems relating to valued images. I hope, you will also take part in the project once it goes on the air, either as nominator, maintainer and/or reviewer. Happy editing, -- Slaunger 22:16, 25 May 2008 (UTC) |
 |
Nevit, I hope you were not discouraged by the decline I did on your set of valued historic images. I am interested in your views on this if you feel there were certain unaddressed aspects in my review. I love your photos by the way. Many of them are very different from what we usually see, and it is refreshing. -- Slaunger 22:16, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Quality Image Promotion
 |
Congratulations! Image Image:Image-Haydarpasa-1070032 1070097b.jpg, which was nominated by you for Quality Image status, was reviewed and has now been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. |
[edit] Declined promotion of my image on quality images candidate
Hello, you rejected my image Image:Nasr ol Molk mosque inside colorful.jpg as a candidate for being promoted quality image saying it was not an image from a wikimedian. The image was first loaded by User:Arria Belli who is also an admin on the commons, from my home page at flickr, I updated it with a better version to fill the quality standards. I am dynamosquito on flickr, see my profile with links to my wikipages, Pentocelo on fr.wiki and Pentocelo on the commons, as all the links show. Therefore, the image is from a wikimedian, myself. Thx to reconsider your judgement taking into account these precisions. In the case you still cast some doubts, thx for asking confirmation to User:Arria Belli who knows me both on flickr and wiki. Kind regards Pentocelo 09:08, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] QI Comment
Hi Nevit, I moved the bicolour Wallaby image into consensual review and marked your comment as an oppose. Could you check here that I have your comment as you would like it ? - Peripitus 11:39, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Category:Cappadocia
Can you please use for your pictures the local points subcategory, such as Goreme, Uçhisar, etc.? It's dump again.--Shakko 10:44, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Quality Image Promotion
 |
Congratulations! Image Image:Glass of tea 05119.jpg, which was nominated by you for Quality Image status, was reviewed and has now been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. |
[edit] FP Promotion
|
|
The image Image:Plastic Protractor Polarized 05375.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Plastic Protractor Polarized 05375.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
--Simonizer (talk) 11:23, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Species, please
Hi, thanks for all your nice photos. Could you please describe the species of the animal, when you can ? For instance, what is the bird displayed in Image:London Zoo 01244.jpg ? Thanks ! Frédéric (talk) 18:56, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Quality Image Promotion
 |
Congratulations! Image Image:Grey seal breast feeding 1150144.jpg, which was nominated by you for Quality Image status, was reviewed and has now been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. |
[edit] Watermark?
You marked Image:Eski Cami.jpg as having a "digital watermark" but it looks to me like what it has is a date/time stamp that some cameras place on either film negatives or digital photos. I'd be surprised if a version of this photo ever existed without that date/time stamp. - Jmabel ! talk 01:01, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Infrared photography
I'm very interested in you Infrared photography. Your results are fascinating, how do you get the x-ray effect with the people in them? do you use a different type of filter for this effect? I bought myself a UV 72 some non descript brand for my Canon 400d with some very interesting effects. Keep up the good work, and thanks for sharing your images they are very inspiring.
Best wishes Paul Harrop
- Most are done with Sony 717 & 828 with Hoya Black or Red IR filter. --Nevit Dilmen (talk) 19:59, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Bubbles in the Dark picture
Hi, I am the owner of fringewiki.info. I am looking to make a new skin and I need a good background. When I was googling dark bubbles you picture came up. I am wondering if I can use it for my site and possibly alter it a little too? I will of course post your name in the attributions page defining that it is your picture. Please email me back or reply via talk page. Thanks and regards, --Truetech (talk) 00:39, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks! Hopefully it will look nice on my fringewiki.info site...Regards, --Truetech (talk) 02:09, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
[edit] سلام
شما فارسی بلدید ؟ --Mardetanha talk 23:06, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
- ایرانی هستید ؟ --Mardetanha talk 23:29, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Bird taking flight
Dear Nevit
I have use your bird taking flight image for a video illustrating a song of mine about a cat. The bird escaped :-)
Duly accredited. :-)
Wrong side of the door
Kind regards
David
Dwsolo (talk) 22:28, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Infrared 02603-tree.jpg
Hello Nevit - can you add the location where this photo was taken, please? - Thanks, MPF (talk) 14:04, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
[edit] London Underground pictures
Cheers for your London Underground pictures. I've managed to categorise the majority of them to the individual stations. Could you help with the few which are left over? Just updating the description with the location would be fine. Cheers Railwayfan2005 (talk) 21:39, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
-
- I'll (eventually) stick them in a gallery and see if somebody else can spot the locations. Cheers all the same. Railwayfan2005 (talk) 22:01, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Use of picture
Hello, I was wondering what the position would be if I wanted to use one of your pictures, specifically the one here, as the banner for a blog for a course on the history and culture of post-war Britain and Ireland that I'm teaching at a Belgian university this semester (starting tomorrow)? It's the best (free) picture I've found that combines a contemporary look with something recognisably British. I'm not sure how far the permissions extend under the GNU (it looks as though I can do pretty much whatever I like as long as I attribute the picture to you and respect its integrity - is that right?) --Paularblaster (talk) 16:20, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks very much! --134.58.127.72 00:14, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
[edit] selamlar
sizin cok cok iyi katkılarıniza gore tesekur ederim.ben da bu kac gunde bir seri ayri resimler yüklemishem onlara da bakin lutfen :-) --Mardetanha talk 21:45, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Quality Image Promotion
 |
Congratulations! Image File:Candles in Love 07406.jpg, which was nominated by you for Quality Image status, was reviewed and has now been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. |
[edit] Quality Image Promotion
 |
Congratulations! Image File:Music 01754.jpg, which was nominated by you for Quality Image status, was reviewed and has now been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. |
[edit] Quality Image Promotion
 |
Congratulations! Image File:Windflower-05237-nevit.JPG, which was nominated by you for Quality Image status, was reviewed and has now been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. |
[edit] Image renaming
I saw that you tagged a image for rename but your not on the checkpage for the bot (Commons:MediaMoveBot/CheckPage) Please go to the the talk page and put your name up for approval so that the bot can automatically rename your request instead of waiting for someone else on that list to confirm for you. Betacommand 16:12, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
[edit] bravo
I find your image File:Dcp7323-Edirne-Eski Camii Allah.jpg very powerful, very symbolic and deeply religious. was the woman praying? --Diligent (talk) 05:25, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
[edit] image needing improvement
Would it be possible to get a correction to this Image you have uploaded. It is helpful to the Article, but sorely needs the missing parts filled in. Exit2DOS2000 (talk) 22:50, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
[edit] File:Science Museum London 1110593 nevit-2.jpg
This image appears to be a copy of a 2D image. Is there any reason not to consider it a derivative work? dito Science Museum London 1110593 nevit.jpg and File:Science_Museum_London_1110594_nevit.jpg Geni (talk) 21:49, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
[edit] File:DSC07483-Freedom.jpg
| File deletion warning | File:DSC07483-Freedom.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца) | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk (nynorsk) | Norsk (bokmål) | Occitan | Polski | Português | Русский | Српски / Srpski | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体) | 中文(繁體) | +/− |
Teofilo (talk) 12:03, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Good photo!
Hi, I just wanted to compliment you on File:Poecilia reticulata Fry DSC04357 nevit.jpg - having recently been trying to take photos of the baby guppies in my tank, and not being anywhere near as successful as you, I must say that you are obviously very talented! Lankiveil (talk) 11:02, 27 September 2009 (UTC).
[edit] Copyright Inquiry
Dear Nevit, I am e-mailing from a production company in England and we are making a documentary series for National Geographic. We would love to use the image you have uploaded, Leonardo da Vinci Parachute, within our documentary. Before we can do so, we need to double check this image is in the public domain. It would be great to discuss this further over e-mail. Please e-mail me at Ellie.davis@parthenonentertainment.com.
Many Thanks,
Ellie ( 212.44.13.2 )
- The Image you requested is not in public domain. It is dual licenced as Creative Commons Share alike and GFDL. That means you can use that image in case you share the film as we have done the photograph. ( You can not copyright the film you produce or the portion contains that photograph) and you should give attribution. For details about the license review the license text under photo. --Nevit Dilmen (talk) 11:55, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Cat Equus caballus
Please don't add the category "Equus caballus" to horse photos, or even the category "Horses". They're incredibly cluttered and basically almost every horse picture should be categorised in one of the numerous subcats according to colour, markings, breed, behavior etc. I just got to remove the cat Equus c. from this picture...
[edit] Quality Image Promotion
 |
Congratulations! Image File:The Gypsy Girl Mosaic of Zeugma 1250575.png, which was nominated by you for Quality Image status, was reviewed and has now been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. |
[edit] FPC
Hi, hope the edit and comments didn't offend you. Would you consider perhaps a conomination on the reedited version? Best regards, Durova (talk) 05:05, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Copyright Query - FOLLOW UP
Dear Nevit,
Thank-you for getting back to me. However, can you please confirm to us that you took this photograph and therefore under the creative commons and GFDL we can use this image within our documentary for: all world/all media/ in perpetuity?
We are happy to give you a credit for this but really need your approval that we can use this image.
Many thanks,
Emily Rudge
emily.rudge@parthenonentertainment.com
0044 1923 286 886
[edit] Quality Image Promotion
 |
Congratulations! Image File:Gaziantep Zoo 1260109 cr.jpg, which was nominated by you for Quality Image status, was reviewed and has now been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. |
