Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Techelsberg Sankt Martin Winterwald 31012015 750.jpg

File:Techelsberg Sankt Martin Winterwald 31012015 750.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Apr 2018 at 07:29:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Techelsberg Sankt Martin Winterwald 31012015 750.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Techelsberg Sankt Martin Winterwald 31012015 750.jpg

11

11

4906

2318

4928

3280

suggested crop --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:06, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena
•  Info created by Johann Jaritz - uploaded by Johann Jaritz - nominated by Johann Jaritz -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:29, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:29, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose not special enough, IMO.--Peulle (talk) 09:09, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Beautiful light -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:45, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
•  Neutral I really like it but I'd have really enjoyed to see the trees getting smaller and smaller in the back (seeing this other image of the same photo session). Those trees in the front are not helping IMHO, either. In other words, it would have been better to inclinate the camera a bit upwards. --Poco² 12:48, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Ralf Roleček 22:17, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment a tighter crop might work, see note --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:06, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

•  Done @Martin Falbisoner: Thanks for your review and suggestion. I cropped the image according to your proposal. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 09:17, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

•  Support, also pinging: Peulle, Basile Morin, Poco, Ralf Roleček --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 11:34, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

 Comment Still oppose for me; it's nice, but just not very ... "niiiice".--Peulle (talk) 14:23, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

• I preferred the original version with the different trees and the shades of tones -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:40, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

• The current version is better but I still miss more image on the top Poco² 18:18, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

•  Support now. Thanks Martin! --Cart (talk) 09:56, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment I don't see anything really interesting in this and the tree bottom right (see note) doesn't help. Charles (talk) 12:36, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
•  Weak support Sharpest part seems to have been cropped out, but overall it makes a nice texture. Daniel Case (talk) 15:14, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
•  Support - Beautiful composition, and the crop resulted in a big improvement. I frankly don't care about the degree of sharpness of the trees in a photo that's so based on the rhythm of the eyes moving around the picture frame that that abstract element is much more important than the details on the individual trees. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:18, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nothing special, no wow for me, per Puelle. --Karelj (talk) 20:31, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:57, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 11:56, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Peulle and Karelj --Milseburg (talk) 11:57, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 06:07, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 11:21, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Natural phenomena