Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Upper Belvedere LCD.jpg

File:Upper Belvedere LCD.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Mar 2011 at 19:25:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Upper Belvedere LCD.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Upper Belvedere LCD.jpg

1459

2250

223

124

5564

3709

Pointing angle quotation mark

•  Info created by Murdockcrc - uploaded by Murdockcrc - nominated by Murdockcrc -- Murdockcrc (talk) 19:25, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Info Night photograph of the Upper Belvedere palace in Vienna, Austria.
•  Support -- Murdockcrc (talk) 19:25, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Dull colours, and rather dark, even for a night shot. Looks very slightly tilted to left as well. - Benh (talk) 20:15, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose As Benh, could be more sharper. --Mile (talk) 20:56, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Comment I like the colors and their atmosphere, has the feeling of weird and mystical. The image is sharp, maybe a bit noisy (ISO 200 would be better), but that's still ok. I have a problem with the composition: At such symmetrical buildings with reflections the image should be centered what isn't the case here. I would crop ~12 pixels at the right and ~312 pixels at the top. Then I would support this very nice photo. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 21:14, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Alternative 1

 Comment Modified the exposure to make the palace brighter without clipping the highlights and applied some sharpening. Feedback is very appreciated. --Murdockcrc (talk) 15:29, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

•  Oppose Nice improvement but I would still oppose. You're not helped by the lighting scheme itself, which is pretty basic. - Benh (talk) 22:12, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Comment What about those Pointing angle quotation marks in the lake, how did they get there? (I annotated one of them on the original for your convenience)--Snaevar (talk) 23:34, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Looking closely at it, it's two posts or something sticking out of the water at opposite angles. The water reflects this, making teh < shape. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 05:47, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Yes, those are metallic posts inside the water, whose purpose is unknown to me. --Murdockcrc (talk) 14:33, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Supports for fireworks ?--Jebulon (talk) 11:03, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 05:45, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality, although I agree on the tilt of this picture witch is 1.14 degrees to the left.--Snaevar (talk) 12:00, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:00, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- IdLoveOne (talk) 05:12, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Very nice improvement. Difficult light conditions.--Jebulon (talk) 11:03, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Neutral Difficult light conditions, but still too noisy...--Citron (talk) 22:28, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:51, 3 March 2011 (UTC)