Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:ICE 3 Kalmykov D. 2006.JPG

Info created by ecomuseum - uploaded by ecomuseum - nominated by ecomuseum --Ecomuseum 15:33, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ecomuseum 15:33, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Much too dark, could be anything. Strange composition, only small part of the object to be seen. -- AM 16:31, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Could be interesting if not so dark. This way it reminds me of Alien (no offense intended).Alvesgaspar 20:53, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Thank you for your imagenation!!! It because I made this picture - I did see Alien design in this train! And it is main reason why this picture so dark. It is not Alien train with usual light - it just boring usual train.Ecomuseum 14:24, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral excellent. But it's a little bit noisy and has lots of jpeg artefacts. Can you upload a less compressed version? norro 14:24, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Thank you for your evaluation! Unfortunately I had too small memory card and it is original file. :-)
Oppose agree with Alvesgaspar --AngMoKio 12:44, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as per AM. --Doco 00:25, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Ansett 06:09, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Heavy poetry XXI century! - Perfect!--DeBarcader 15:33, 22 December 2006 (UTC) please log in to vote -- Lycaon 09:23, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

 1 support, 6 oppose >> not featured (rule of the 7th day) Lycaon 00:26, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose I completely concur with AM. Arjun 21:22, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is a fine image, looks like a scene from the future but yet it's a picture from the present. Underexposing the image allows the attention to be drawn to the train, and the surrounding lights create a very moody atmosphere. What I don't like (but I still vote for the image) is the quality of the image, which is very poor: very noisy and with lots of compression artefacts. Ecomuseum, try doing some more post-processing (some Photoshopping), you can definitely improove the image quality. --Andy 11:56, 01 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Info Here is a slightly edited version, which in my opinion improves the overall quality of the image. It's less noisy, and looks more futuristic. I've done an edge-preserving blur, and then several soft blurs for the lights to make them look anti-aliased (original image is very sharp). I know voting finished, but I like this image and I felt it deserved some post-processing. -- User:Atoma 12:28, 03 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support I love this picture!! I think it would be a great picture of the day. Also, I don't really see a difference between the 2 pictures... 12.227.160.225 14:22, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Navigation menu