Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Male Lion and Cub Chitwa South Africa Luca Galuzzi 2004 edit1.jpg

#1 #2

Info created, uploaded and nominated by LucaG 20:37, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A male lion and his cub eating a Cape Buffalo in Northern Sabi Sand, South Africa.
Support Wonderful. Noise is a bit disturbing though. --norro 21:41, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose ~~Neutral~~ due to noise. -- Ram-Man 21:49, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes ISO400 on a 300D produces some noise. It was shooted at sunrise in dim light and with lions moveing around the only option for sharpness was to raise sensitivity. I prefer not to edit images that really do not need it. --LucaG 21:57, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Malene Thyssen 22:07, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Benh 23:11, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Digon3 23:41, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support If we are going to look at noise, I'm afraid we're going to see only "no noise" and no action pictures from Pittsburgh Zoo.(I've nothing against Pittsburgh Zoo, yet wild animals look so much better!)--Mbz1 04:27, 3 June 2007 (UTC)Mbz1[reply]
Support --Simonizer 14:00, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Martin Kozák 11:20, 4 June 2007 (UTC) — I don't see any reason for support as featured picture. It is a very good picture, but there is a lot of very good pictures. I've thought, featured pictures are the best pictures who are good at something and excel by something.[reply]

result: 6 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral => waiting for other version Simonizer 07:55, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Info - Noise reduced
Support --Arad 14:30, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good picture anyway,I support with noise reduction Vassil 2 June 2007.
Support --Karelj 20:51, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Malene Thyssen 21:01, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support This picture looks much better with noise reduction applied. -- Ram-Man 22:36, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MichaelMaggs 06:24, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Simonizer 10:20, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Martin Kozák 11:20, 4 June 2007 (UTC) — As above.[reply]
Oppose The good effects of noise reduction were that contrast became poor;it was corrected by applying a massive contrast enhancement, producing very wide "halos" of light around the "meat", and false light! The image now looks too much edited, even at small resolution like on this page! The final effect is like a superposition of 2D stickers, with all differences of depths lost! Verdy p 20:18, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Bergwolf 15:04, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Not worried by the effects mentioned by Verdy p, as I either don't see them or they are negligible at normal magnifications. I have already voted to support, anyway. --MichaelMaggs 16:03, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment --Thermos 05:50, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support // tsca [re] 12:59, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- bloody... typhoonchaser 06:58, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

result: 10 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Simonizer 07:15, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Navigation menu