Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Plastic- and Nylonzipper.jpg

Image:Plastic- and Nylonzipper.jpg, featured

•  Info created by Rabensteiner - uploaded by Rabensteiner - nominated by --Rabensteiner 11:28, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --Rabensteiner 11:28, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
•  Support For nice, muted colour palette, well controlled reflective highlights and good detail. In addition, informative. --Thermos 16:00, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --Aqwis 16:23, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --Acarpentier 16:41, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose What are you trying to hide with this monochrome tint? Unsharpness, overexposure, noise,... ? Lycaon 18:58, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
  •  Comment opposition is not because of being monochrome, but for the obvious quality defects that are trying to hide behind it. Lycaon 22:41, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
•  Support I don't think a picture should be faulted for being monochrome if it doesn't take any of the value out of the image. Most of the pictures here should be in color but ones like this should be the rare exception. Assuming de:Bild:Profil und spiralreissverschluss.jpg is the original color I sure don't blame him/her for changing it. Calibas 00:54, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose That is true there are some unsharpnesses in the pictures. Quality of an image is a must, and changing the color range to monochrome only shows that the original image is flawed. -- Felipe Aira 10:43, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
•  Support We are not nominating the original image, so it doesn't matter if that one was flawed.. this one for sure isnt. Yzmo 18:36, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

•  Support Good graphic photograph. Black and white photography is as valid now as in the first day. Color photography hides a lot of faults in photography in general. Black and white photography presinds of this variable, thus when it is good in the absense of color, it is indeed a good photograph. --Tomascastelazo 21:51, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
•  Neutral - Very good graphic composition but quality is not good enough: lack of detail and visible noise. As for being B&W that is not a valid reason for opposing IMO - Alvesgaspar 21:54, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
•  Support I think it's a good use of monochrome. /Daniel78 00:17, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --Lerdsuwa 07:09, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Romary 08:53, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Monochrome works well IMO, and noise is only minimal. RedCoat 16:34, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Sharp at high resolution, monochrome works quite well here.--Sandahl 19:39, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --Javier ME 23:24, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
•  Support - Husky ^{(talk to me)} 22:50, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
•  Comment Shouldn't the Category 'Black and white images' be filled with grayscale images? -- carol 10:07, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  • One would hope so :) RedCoat 15:07, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
    • This is not BW, BTW, it is monochrome. Lycaon 15:58, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose this is not the best --Richard Bartz 00:56, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
•  Support I like this, quite good. I love the tone and the texture. There is nothing wrong with this picture. -- Ram-Man 04:03, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose I dont think this image is special. /Ö 16:07, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose Black and white would do the job. --AM 21:34, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

result: 15 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral => featured. Lycaon 22:28, 10 December 2007 (UTC)