Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/File:Kizil Hauzen Bridge by Eugène Flandin.jpg

Deprecated removal nomination

File:Kizil Hauzen Bridge by Eugène Flandin.jpg (delist), not delisted Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Jan 2014 at 21:59:30  Info I think it should had never been selected to be a FP image due to the very low quality of the photo. It shouldn't had been nominated as a set and the other image was the only reason it got the FP status. (Original nomination)  Delist -- Kruusamägi (talk) 21:59, 2 January 2014 (UTC)  Keep The quality is perfectly fine for a historical image. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:41, 3 January 2014 (UTC)  Delist Looks for me like a scan from a small print of the image (e.g. from a book). Sorry, not excellent for me. --Tuxyso (talk) 09:04, 3 January 2014 (UTC)  Comment It was promoted in a set, if you want to delist this image, the other must be also delisted because the other one would not maybe have been promoted without this one. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:09, 3 January 2014 (UTC) Christian, if you see there, you will realize that most people who oppose against this zoomed image, liked each other, for example: Kruusamägi, said: "If it should be seen as a set, then I can't agree with the nomination due to the very low quality of the second image"and Julian H., who said: "Fully support the first one, but the second image has quality problems and I don't see a reason for nominating this as a set." ArionEstar (talk) 14:13, 3 January 2014 (UTC)  Keep Sorry; this is recently promoted (24 December 2013) and we can't discuss it again and again every week. Jee 16:54, 3 January 2014 (UTC)  Keep I think we need a rule: a "renomination" is possible after a half year at the last nomination, better one year. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 17:04, 3 January 2014 (UTC)  Keep Per Jee, we can't discuss it again and again every week all the promotions of the past week (in 3 or 4 years, ok) --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:07, 3 January 2014 (UTC) IMHO the general problem / failure with the original nomination was to nominate it as a set. --Tuxyso (talk) 17:10, 3 January 2014 (UTC) I personally against set nominations and they are not properly handled in our FP galleries. But we have to respect community consensus here. Any attempt to improve set nominations and how they should be handled (whether equal preference as single nominations or not, whether eligible for POTY or not, etc.) can be discussed on FPC Talk. As far as I know not all sets are going to our chronological lists and so will not appear in POTY. For this set, I only added the first picture to the chronological list. Jee 17:21, 3 January 2014 (UTC)  Keep see Alchemist-hp --Ralf Roleček 11:13, 5 January 2014 (UTC)  Comment As it was said, then the problem is that with set nominations, images like that may pass to become FP-s. How could this be any reason at all, that this was "recently promoted"? Specially, when the problem is that, it shouldn't had been promoted at all. Kruusamägi (talk) 13:55, 5 January 2014 (UTC) It should be decided by the majority of opinions. Can't you see "9 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral" there? Jee 14:10, 5 January 2014 (UTC)  Keep Per King of Hearts. Michael Barera (talk) 21:36, 5 January 2014 (UTC)  Keep As Jee and King of Hearts. --P e z i (talk) 22:08, 5 January 2014 (UTC) Result: 2 delist, 7 keep, 0 neutral => not delisted. Jee 05:01, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Delisted in March 18, 2024 with 13 delist, 0 keep, 0 neutral. See Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/Image:Kizil Hauzen Bridge by Eugène Flandin.jpg -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:05, 18 March 2024 (UTC)