Info There is an edited version of this file, lacking the stains. I suggest the replacement of the current featured with the proposed image. Also looking at the file's nomination, this edited image was proposed later on, but there was a mistake. (Original nomination)
That's a bad idea... it's always best to keep the originals as separate files, in my opinion and clearly mark the edited image as an edit. 72.78.222.602:29, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Each image links to the other in the "other versions" section, and it says which one is edited and which one is the original. Or did you mean something else? diego_pmc10:44, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
replace; agree with Dori, simply upload it with same name, the original is still available in the revision history and it's really unlikely that somebody wants to use the lower-quality image instead of the edit. -- Gorgo18:48, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Check their usage. The edited version is more widely used than the original. You wouldn't solve anything by doing that. Besides this isn't the 1st nor the last when the original is supposed to be kept. :) diego_pmc13:20, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Info There is an edited version of this file, lacking the stains. I suggest the replacement of the current featured with the proposed image. Also looking at the file's nomination, this edited image was proposed later on, but there was a mistake. (Original nomination)
Delist and replace --diego_pmc 18:54, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Just upload over it as it's already in use as a pic, and it's not that radical of an edit. --Dori - Talk 15:11, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
