Commons:Graphic Lab/Photography workshop

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Illustration workshop Illustration workshop – Make a request   Map workshop Map workshop – Make a request   Photography workshop Photography workshop – Make a request   Video and sound workshop Video and sound workshop – Make a request  

Camera-photo.svg Photography workshop

This workshop is part of the Graphics Lab, a project aimed at picture retouching to improve the graphical content of the Wikimedia projects. More information about the lab can be found on its main page and requests pages (Illustrations ; Photographs ; Maps ; Video and Sound). To ask questions or make a suggestions, see the talk page of the graphic lab page.

This specific page is the requests page for the Photography Workshop. Anyone can make a request for a photograph to be improved. The standard format for making a request is shown below, along with general advice, and should be followed.

Make a request

See also[edit]

Filing cabinet icon.svg

SpBot archives all sections tagged with {{Section resolved|1=~~~~}} after 10 days. For the archive overview, see /Archive. The latest archive is located at /Archive/2015.

La Reine de Tahiti. Dessin de Henri Meyer, 1884[edit]

Article(s): w:Johanna Marau Ta‘aroa


Could someone please clean and restore File:La Reine de Tahiti. Dessin de Henri Meyer, 1884.jpg better than this attempt. Try starting over from this version if it helps. --KAVEBEAR (talk) 03:23, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Graphist opinion(s):

✓ Done. Regards, MagentaGreen (talk) 06:12, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
Sorry but no offense and thanks for the effort. Trying to be as polite as possible here...Can anybody else do a better job without the great contrast change and brightening? Thanks.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 07:54, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
@KAVEBEAR: I´m sorry too, but I think it's neither purposeful nor particularly polite when you are not trying to debate on the result with the last editor, but immediately after the edit is done, calling for another, who should do a better job.
One can talk about everything. For example, about the areas in which very concretely the image is too bright. I can agree with darken the facial area and have changed that in the meantime. On the other hand, it is normal if the image becomes brighter when a "Clean up" is required. I would appreciate it if you could be more precise in both the request and the subsequent criticism (with you hardly avoidable). Regards, MagentaGreen (talk) 08:51, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
I have replaced it with a copy of MagentaGreens "BW restored" version with some softening of the facial area. I believe it looks much clearer. ~ R.T.G 19:03, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
@RTG:Sorry, but your editing looks like a fake and the softening rather like dirt. The fine strokes results from the technology used by the illustrator and therefore need not be blurred. On the contrary, they should be preserved, because it's not a photograph.
Regards, MagentaGreen (talk) 09:40, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
Red x.svg StaleWw2censor (talk) 00:12, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

New photo montages of Seoul needed[edit]

Article(s): Between them these two are used in about 35 different language versions of the Wikipedias for their respective articles on Seoul

Request: Hi all, we need new photo-montages of Seoul suitable for use in infoboxes, the two widely used one in the wikipedias both contain non free content, File:Seoul landmark picture 2.jpg contains three images that have been deleted, and File:Seoul montage 2013.jpg is unfree as there is no FoP in South Korea and the N Seoul Tower is included in the montage. We need either to create a new photo montage from scratch that is clean FoP wise, or remove from the two we have those elements which are not free. My preference would be to rework File:Seoul landmark picture 2.jpg or to create a new work, as the copyright of individual elements in File:Seoul montage 2013.jpg is unclear. Any takers? Thanks in advance.--KTo288 (talk) 20:26, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

These need help too.--KTo288 (talk) 10:28, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

Graphist opinion(s):

Red x.svg StaleWw2censor (talk) 00:09, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Enhance the background[edit]

Article(s): سنجاب


Can you please enhance the back ground and make it clearer?--باسم (talk) 20:31, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

Graphist opinion(s):

Stock-brush-red.svg Request taken by MagentaGreen (talk) 11:32, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
✓ Done. MagentaGreen (talk) 13:55, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

Gran Vía, Madrid[edit]

Article(s): Gran Vía (Madrid)


There was a reflection of some lights (neon letters) in the sky (it was shot indoors), I tried to remove them but now the sky has different shades of blue, could you please make it uniform? Thank you very much! I add a note on the affected sky zone. --Kadellar (talk) 16:59, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Graphist opinion(s):

I think I fixed it? Somewhat difficult to see, however inverting colours made it somewhat better. --///EuroCarGT 04:36, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
Thank you very much! It looks better now. However, I think there's still some parts to improve. Can someone have a look on the newer version? I added another note. --Kadellar (talk) 15:57, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
✓ Done? --///EuroCarGT 01:59, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
Red x.svg StaleWw2censor (talk) 00:05, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

How can I improve that?[edit]

Citrus x limonia in a black background


I just want a help to improve the quality, how can I improve this image? (white background is not a option) --Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton (talk) 12:58, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Graphist opinion(s):

This could be an option. Please revert if not satisfied. Regards, MagentaGreen (talk) 14:29, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
MagentaGreen, thanks for your attention, but this became totally artificial, and created some chromatic aberrations. Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton (talk) 16:38, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
Well, then I do not know what you are expecting. Could you please be a bit more precise? In addition, chromatic aberration results from a distortion due to an inaccuracy of the lens and not of the software. Regards, MagentaGreen (talk) 19:45, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
The question is very simple, there is a way to improve that photo?
Shoot it in a different angle, increase light, decrease light, change exposition, change aperture...
Balance in more warm/cold colour, put more vibrancy...
Ore it's ok, it's a good quality image? Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton (talk) 23:52, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I noticed it has black "things" in the reflection. It is distracting. -- Deadstar (msg) 12:37, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
I agree with Deadstar and the center of the cut fruit is "burned". Then I ask, Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton: which is the scope of the picture?--Pierpao.lo (listening) 09:21, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Please enhance this pic (if possible)[edit]

Article(s): میرزا_علی_قائم‌مقام


A new scan/photo would be the best option. But since I don't know where to find this image, is it possible to enhance it in some way? Thanks in advance--Carnby (talk) 20:07, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Graphist opinion(s):

✓ Done – I hope my attempt will satisfy you, otherwise feel free to revert to previous version. Regards, MagentaGreen (talk) 13:22, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
@MagentaGreen: Thanks a lot. I have cleared the background, but it looks a bit unnatural... probably a fuzzy pattern would be better.--Carnby (talk) 22:47, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
Red x.svg StaleWw2censor (talk) 00:02, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Montage needed for article Fountain[edit]

Article(s): Fountain Request:

Could the wizards of the Graphics lab please create a single montage of the above images of fountains? The first image in the list, the Jet d'eau in Geneva, should probably be in the center, but I leave the arrangements to the more creative minds of the Lab. Many thanks for what you do!--SiefkinDR (talk) 08:14, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

Graphist opinion(s):

✓ Done

Hello, i did the fountains collage. I hope that it serves to you. Eme Chicano (talk) 10:41, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
Fountains Collage.jpg
Dear Eme, great work on the fountain collage; I've placed it in the article on the Fountain. Many thanks! SiefkinDR82.244.120.6 07:48, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Ww2censor (talk) 00:01, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Typo in phylogenetic tree[edit]

Article(s): already in use: 13 pages in 8 languages


There is a typo, instead of "Keyna 1987" it should say "Kenya 1987" -- 09:10, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Graphist opinion(s): ✓ Done --Fred the Oyster (talk) 03:18, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Ww2censor (talk) 00:00, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Corrupt file[edit]

Article(s): Oriol Hernández


It says is a corrupt file. When I click over the file, it loads a little bit, but it seems like the file cannot be used. Could it be recovered? --Coentor (talk) 09:34, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Graphist opinion(s):

I have reverted it to the older, smaller, version which was working. I would suggest you try uploading the file again, perhaps the transfer got interrupted or something. -mattbuck (Talk) 23:56, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
No, I mean, the reverted one is other photo. The original file corrupted, and if Someone checks the old version, sill see that it loads a little, until it finally fails.--Coentor (talk) 16:07, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Nice hill, dull sky[edit]



This is an interesting hill whatever way you look at it. But when I put it in the article and it appears as a thumb, the turbines disappear. I can't just paint a blue sky in because the shading on the mountain would be obvious. I can't just cut to a close up of one turbine because then the picture is fairly unnotable with no hill in it. I think if the turbines were more visible in the thumbnail it would be nice art for the article. ~ R.T.G 02:00, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Graphist opinion(s):

✓ Done Just a suggestion. Regards, MagentaGreen (talk) 07:43, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
@MagentaGreen: I'm amazed at the amount of improvement you have made to the image. I think if it was uploaded separately it could improve the en:Image editing#Contrast change and brightening section, but I think nothing but a blistering day or a closer perspective would really make those things stand out. It's like the moon. It's huge until you take a picture of it. ~ R.T.G 18:48, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
Despite the attempt to separate the contrast of color processing, it is not easy to edit separately these two aspects. Since I was not even suburb, I have to rely ultimately on other photos in the net (e.g. here) and on feedback on the color scheme. Regards, MagentaGreen (talk) 21:11, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Did an extra edit. Sky is more dramatic but I'm not sure if its any better. Amada44  talk to me 14:20, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

@Amada44:Great colour improvement. Amazed again. I tried that one in the article. Great example between the 3 pictures of what is possible ~ R.T.G 14:53, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Crop of File:Victoria & Albert Museum Central Garden, London, UK - Diliff.jpg[edit]

Article(s): en:Template:WikiProject Museums


Could someone please crop this image to a close-up of the central pavilion? Ham (talk) 10:09, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Graphist opinion(s):

Try CropTool.--Coentor (talk) 16:08, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
I deskewd it a bit. If you like it, please upload the image again yourself as I have just loaded it untop of a test image. Amada44  talk to me 21:18, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
The de-skewing is great, but it is a little stretched out—compare it with the image it's intended to replace on the template. It might also look best if the tall central pavilion is in the centre of the composition. Ham (talk) 19:13, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
better? Cheers - Amada44  talk to me 19:58, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
That's perfect—thank you! I'll upload it myself as you've suggested. Ham (talk) 18:09, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
See File:Victoria & Albert Museum Central Garden, London, UK - Diliff (crop).jpg. Ham (talk) 19:39, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Ww2censor (talk) 23:57, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

removal of extraneous text[edit]

Iroquois Theatre fire
To the left of the fatalities list are various details regarding the fire; I suppose that can stay. To the right, however, are some other news stories which had nothing to do with the fire in question. I'd like those removed -- and, since that would leave a big blank space, would it be possible to fill that blank space with neutral gray newsprint texture from elsewhere in the image? -- DS (talk) 16:44, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s)
IMO, PNG is best for this type of document. I made a PNG version with a transparent background. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:40, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Ww2censor (talk) 23:55, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Politicians in World War II[edit]

Article about Ferdinand Čatloš and Ferenc Szálasi in different languages of Wikipedia
Could somebody please remove "NAC" watermark and the cross line from these photos? --Trimnapaschkan (talk) 22:39, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s)
done. Amada44  talk to me 13:49, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Thank you Amada44, but you forgot the watermark at the bottom right on the first photo. --Trimnapaschkan (talk) 14:11, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
@Amada44: Could you please also remove the "NAC" watermark at the bottom right on the Čatloš-photo. --Trimnapaschkan (talk) 14:58, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
Sorry, I missed that one. cheers, Amada44  talk to me 20:42, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Ww2censor (talk) 23:54, 20 January 2015 (UTC)


I might could be increased be glad for the focus on the mill and the quality would be increased. --FritsHG eh?
Graphist opinion(s)
Well, I did something. But overall image quality is quite bad. Not much can be done. Amada44  talk to me 14:01, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Thirty Seconds to Mars in Italy[edit]

Articles about Thirty Seconds to Mars and its band members Jared Leto and Shannon Leto in different languages of Wikipedia
Could somebody please remove the watermarks from these photos? --Earthh (talk) 23:33, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s)

Mexican guitar duo[edit]

en:Rodrigo y Gabriela
Remove watermark from recently kept deletion nominated image. --Ww2censor (talk) 22:03, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s)
✓ Done by Centpacrr
Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Ww2censor (talk) 23:48, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2013 in Bolivia[edit]

I'm reviewing and preparing for QIC the most of the pictures taken by this contest, will it be possible to straighten this pictures, please? Regards!!! --Ezarateesteban 13:20, 23 December 2014 (UTC)


Is it possible to correct the overexposed hand? Thanks in advance, --Yann (talk) 00:17, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s)

Fix flash reflection[edit]

Is it possible to correct the flash reflection? Thanks in advance, --Yann (talk) 09:54, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s)

Arshin Mal Alan[edit]

Articles about "Arshin mal alan" operetta in different languages of Wikipedia, e.g. in en:Arshin Mal Alan (operetta)
Details of your request go here… --Interfase (talk) 09:53, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
Please remove "fotobank" watremark and big diagonal lines from it. Thanks. --Interfase (talk) 23:34, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s)

@Interfase:You didn't write what you wanted us to do with the picture. --Goran tek-en (talk) 19:52, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Sorry, forget. --Interfase (talk) 23:34, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Add a heading for your request here![edit]

Details of your request go here… -- 14:09, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s)