Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives April 23 2019

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Portrait-glamour.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Romantic portraitureI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:. By User:Destailleur --Websteralive 04:07, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:56, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
    Why the land behind looks tilted? --Aldnonymous 06:45, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support It's a very good QI --Eatcha 09:15, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
     Support It may be whimsical, but it's quality. The 'tilted' effect is likely that the road is moving away or uphill. --Acabashi 09:48, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The cropped head is a no-go for me --Poco a poco 11:34, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Poco --MB-one 10:40, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality (I don't mind the cropped head and elbows). --Palauenc05 13:48, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support per Pal -- Piotr Bart 20:16, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support Very good image -- Spurzem 20:24, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support per Pal --Cvmontuy 11:53, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Total: 6 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 10:20, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

File:KZ_Hinzert_Gedenkstätte_2018.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Hinzert concentration camp, memorial. --Cayambe 06:45, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Tilted CCW.--Peulle 07:41, 11 April 2019 (UTC) ✓ Done Tilt corrected. Thanks for the hint.--Cayambe 16:32, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Comment Dear Peulle: could you please review again this mage after the removal of the tilt? --Cayambe 09:24, 16 April 2019 (UTC) Time has come to discuss this image. --Cayambe 07:56, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support - I might be missing something, but this looks alright to me. -- Ikan Kekek 06:46, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support Fine 4 me. --Palauenc05 11:50, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 10:20, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

File:Apricots_Oranges_and_Saturn_Peaches_at_Broadstairs_Kent_England.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Apricots Oranges and Saturn Peaches. --Acabashi 09:54, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:42, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Unfortunate lighting. The left upper part is too dark and some fruits are too bright. No QI for me. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 16:39, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Comment The vivid colour and brightness of the fruit is what attracted me. If you can believe, they were perhaps even richer. As for the shadow, I blame the sun. I didn't want to manufacture something that took it away from reality, and I felt the shadow helped bring out the intensity of the subject. Many thanks for comments for or against. Acabashi 11:53, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support Burnt out jobs are hardly to be avoided in this situation and in my opinion tolerable.--Ermell 19:09, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 10:24, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

File:Logotipo_Dykrra.jpg[edit]

File:Logotipo Dykrra.jpg

  • Nomination Logotipo DykrraI. By User:Diego guerra --Websteralive 06:10, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Piotr Bart 21:12, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Potential problems with copyrights. See image description --Jakubhal 04:46, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose agree. Seven Pandas 21:16, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  I withdraw my support  Oppose File deleted -- Piotr Bart 01:12, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Seven Pandas 10:25, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

File:Wikimedia_Community_Logo_Hindi_हिन्दी.svg[edit]

  • Nomination Wikimedia Community Logo Hindi हिन्दी language --Suyash.dwivedi 14:15, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Yann 10:47, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Piotr Bart 21:12, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. IMO too simple. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 18:45, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Too simple.--Peulle 22:02, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support - This isn't a triangle or something. I think it's complex enough to merit the QI designation. -- Ikan Kekek 01:31, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support per Ikan -- Eatcha 16:30, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 10:26, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

File:Wikigraphists_Bootcamp_2018_India_Logo_hi.svg[edit]

  • Nomination विकिग्राफिस्ट्स बूटकैम्प २०१८ भारत --Suyash.dwivedi 14:10, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Piotr Bart 21:12, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. This kind of logos is generally considered too simple. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 18:13, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Yes, all of the previous noms were declined for that reason.--Peulle 22:02, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support - Not all that simple, IMO, and a good logo. -- Ikan Kekek 01:33, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support per Ikan -- Eatcha 16:30, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support per Ikan. --Trougnouf 09:11, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 10:26, 22 April 2019 (UTC)