Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives August 04 2022

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Mating_pair_of_Symphaedra_nais_(Forster,_1771)_-_Baronet_WLB.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Mating pair of Symphaedra nais (Forster, 1771) - Baronet. (by Anitava Roy) --Atudu 07:29, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Support Good quality. --Charlesjsharp 09:01, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
     Oppose for now. I'm not sure about the sharpness, but there are details visible. However, the purple CA on the legs of the butterfly on the left must be corrected. -- Ikan Kekek 18:37, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Not sharp, purple CA. --Tagooty 03:14, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --A.Savin 17:55, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

File:Grave_in_the_cloister_of_the_Cathedral_of_Girona_05.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Grave in the cloister of the Cathedral of Girona, Catalonia, Spain --Kritzolina 06:41, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 09:13, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Needs a perspective correction. --Ermell 09:27, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
  •  Comment New version: perspective fixed using shiftN. Please review. --Smial 08:20, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
  •  Comment Looks good. Kritzolina, are you OK with the edit? -- Ikan Kekek 19:42, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
    •  Comment Grateful for the help, yes, I already thanked Smial for the new upload! --Kritzolina 20:45, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
  • OK.  Support, good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 04:29, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --A.Savin 17:55, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

File:Palacio_de_Comunicaciones_-_46.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Palace of Communication, Madrid, Spain. This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Monuments 2012. By User:Lojwe --A1Cafel 09:11, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality --Michielverbeek 09:54, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Weak  Oppose because the sharpness is questionable, so I think this deserves a discussion. -- Ikan Kekek 17:45, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
  •  Comment Some CA. If removed it would also enhance the sharpness a bit. In the center of the image, the photo is not absolutely pixel sharp, but it would suffice for an A4-size printout after CA correction. --Smial 09:28, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
  •  Comment Photographer is Kadellar not Lojwe. @A1Cafel: What about attributing properly, is that difficult? --A.Savin 17:53, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
    • @A.Savin: I just used the QICHelper to nominate. Perhaps the system recognized the lastest editor as the uploader. --A1Cafel 02:58, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Ikan Kekek. --Tagooty 03:12, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --A.Savin 17:55, 3 August 2022 (UTC)