Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives August 30 2022

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:VíaenEmpalmeSanCarlos-SantaFe.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Railway track owned by General Belgrano Railway, Empalme San Carlos, Santa Fe Province, Argentina by User:BugWarp --Ezarate 23:15, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:47, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree, too grainy for me, too much of the sky & dust spots. --Tournasol7 06:00, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Excessive, blurring noise reduction, CA, dust spots. Picture contrast a little too high for my taste. Image composition, colours and lighting otherwise quite ok. As far as image noise is concerned: Please say goodbye to the widespread idea that digital images must be free of any noise. We are judging JPGs here, which, as we know, have only 8 bits per colour channel. That is just 256 gradations. Especially with more or less monochrome colour gradients, as we often see in blue skies, these are pitifully few levels. If you overdo the noise reduction in such cases, the result is often banding instead. And that usually looks really awful. With JPGs, a certain amount of noise is absolutely necessary to achieve visually natural colours. Btw: In professionally produced graphics, a certain amount of image noise is artificially added for exactly this reason for reproduction on devices that only offer a limited colour depth. --Smial 22:25, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Image is artistic but technically lacking. Original image was out of focus so no miracles possible. Big black smudge added on medium-left also. --D4m1en 09:35, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 11:01, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

File:Close_wing_basking_position_of_Neopithecops_zalmora_(Butler,_1870)_-_Common_Quaker.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination: Close wing basking position of Neopithecops zalmora (Butler, 1870) - Common Quaker --ManaskaMukhopadhyay 16:10, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
  • Review
  •  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:24, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose colour is not right. This is a white butterfly --Charlesjsharp 14:55, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
  • @Vincent Vega: Poco is the voter, not the originator. Charlesjsharp 18:20, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Peulle 11:01, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

File:Close_wing_moisture_sucking_of_Everes_lacturnus_(Godart,_1824)_-_Orange-crowned_Cupid_WLB.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination: Close wing moisture sucking of Everes lacturnus (Godart, 1824) - Orange-crowned Cupid. (by Anitava Roy) --Atudu 06:08, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
  • Review
  •  Support Good quality. --Vincent Vega 08:43, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose This image must have been upscaled. The camera has got a maximum resolution of 3,888 × 2,592 pixels. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 15:33, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Peulle 11:00, 29 August 2022 (UTC)