Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives December 17 2013

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Massener_Strasse_23_(Unna)_IMGP4253_wp.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination House in Unna, Germany, cultural heritage monument A 071. --Smial 18:27, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --JLPC 19:26, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
    It is technically again of good quality and destined to be QI, but there is still a slight perspective correction necessary. Furthermore, I strongly suggest a crop of the foreground shadow. --Cccefalon 08:37, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
  • reworked -- Smial 23:08, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
  •  Support --Cccefalon 15:25, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Cccefalon 20:43, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

File:TaxiSalta.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Taxi en la ciudad de Salta, Argentina --Ezarate 02:01, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
     Oppose Red CA and perspective issues, correctible Poco a poco 09:04, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
  • Decline Did some improvements but I still think it’s overexposed. Let’s get some more opinions. --Kreuzschnabel 09:13, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined   --Cccefalon 22:37, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Arando 150706 REFON .jpg[edit]

  • Nomination: Arando a terra para cultivo da cana-de-açucar, Avaré, São Paulo, Brasil--Jose Reynaldo da Fonseca 17:56, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
  • Review  Support OK --A.Savin 18:11, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
     Oppose I wouldn’t mind overexposure on background or in headlights, but i do mind it on the man’s shirt. --Kreuzschnabel 08:26, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Cccefalon 22:35, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Point_Mugu_September_2013_010.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Mugu Rock, Point Mugu, California. --King of Hearts 22:01, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Comment Nice to see you - at the bottom. May be a better crop without the shadow.--XRay 08:05, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
    I feel that not much can be cropped at the bottom without affecting the composition. I don't think the shadow is a major distraction; in fact I did not even notice the shadow myself until you mentioned it, and even then I'm not sure if it is a shadow of me or of something else. --King of Hearts 10:36, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
     Comment Let's have a look for a third opinion.--XRay 05:28, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
    * Support with or w/o the shadow--Moroder 14:47, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
  •  Support QI --P e z i 17:15, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Cccefalon 05:13, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Autignac, Hérault 03.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Autignac, Hérault, France. --Christian Ferrer 06:27, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion  SupportGood quality --EpsilonEridani 21:54, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
     Neutral Underexposed IMHO. --Kreuzschnabel 06:52, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
    ✓ Done Brightened version, however the sun is close to the horizon --Christian Ferrer 10:22, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done Brightened again, but if I put this image more bright, take out your sunglasses --Christian Ferrer 17:34, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
  •  Support now. --JLPC 19:31, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Cccefalon 05:18, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Zürich (Schweiz), Auto in der Bahnhofstrasse -- 2011 -- 1425.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination: Car at the Bahnhofstraße in Zürich, Switzerland --XRay 08:04, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
  • Review  Oppose Overexposed, blown red causing blueish colour. --Kreuzschnabel 10:55, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
     Comment I do not think the image is overexposed. The car was actually pink, not red. (You've seen too many red Ferraris, right?)--XRay 12:44, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
    Maybe :-) what struck me is that the top side has a much bluer tone than the sides. The red channel is pure white without showing any detail. --Kreuzschnabel 12:58, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
    ✓ Done I changed espacially the blue color. I do not see any color problems. If there are problems, please tell me. --XRay 14:52, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

 Support Interessantes Foto. Außerdem technisch einwandfrei. -- Spurzem 10:31, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
 Support Agree with Spurzem, fulfills QI criteria IMHO. Had the same impression as Kreuzschnabel first, but it seems the colors represent reality - A crime to Ferrari I guess ... --Optograph (talk) 15:39, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Optograph (talk) 15:39, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Ips-nscf-2013-immers-3686.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination: Cooling system «Immers» filled with coolant, contains the electronic boards and SSDs in that coolant. --PereslavlFoto 20:34, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
  • Review  Oppose unsharp --Stepro 10:05, 3 December 2013 (UTC) But where is it unsharp? --PereslavlFoto 20:05, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
     Support --JLPC 19:25, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Cccefalon 05:22, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Paris 75001 Jardins du Carrousel lawn 20090424 farniente.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination: Spring lazing, jardin des Tuileries, Paris (1st arr.), France. --JLPC 17:19, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
  • Review  Oppose Sorry, but the composition is quite poor. --Pleclown 20:23, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
    We don't have the same idea of composition. If someone wants to decline there must be some more serious reasons to do so.--JLPC 16:54, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
     Oppose Bad composition is a reason, and one I agree with. The foreground people are in the way, but not fully in shot. You're at a halfway house which is no good. Mattbuck 00:37, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
  •  Support Composition is not so bad, foreground people are turned in direction and are showing the slepping peoples, good illustration of a calm moment in this garden --Christian Ferrer 14:05, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
  •  Support good quality --P e z i 18:34, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Cccefalon 05:23, 16 December 2013 (UTC)