Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives December 24 2015

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:2014_Prowincja_Wajoc_Dzor,_Dżermuk,_Rzeźba_w_skale_(03).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Sculpture in the rock - Andranik Ozanian. Jermuk, Vayots Dzor Province, Armenia. --Halavar 16:05, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Comment A little more contrast would be fine in your photos. But for me, good quality.--Famberhorst 16:44, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, the subject is too blurred and poor DOF (f/5.6)--Lmbuga 23:52, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined   --Medium69 14:39, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

File:Headstone of Fyodor Stravinsky by V Beklemishev and L Pozen.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination St. Petersburg. Tikhvin Cemetery. The headstone of Fyodor Stravinsky. --Dmitry Ivanov 21:21, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Comment Please check your image. IMO it's oversharpened. --XRay 11:54, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
    •  Comment @XRay: Could you be more specific, please? ...I cannot find halos, the local contrast is rather high, but, IMO, quite acceptable... I have some suppositions about reasons of your critical opinion, so, please, have a look on image notes. Dmitry Ivanov 19:33, 18 December 2015 (UTC).
      •  Comment I've added a note. IMO this part looks oversharpened. Heavy contrast. Please try to improve this. Or is it real?--XRay 07:23, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
        •  Comment@XRay: Have a look on a new version (in whole, it is an attempt to reduce the local conrast) and image notes. If you are not satisfied, decline the photo, or let’s ask for consensual review. Thanks for your review. Dmitry Ivanov 14:48, 19 December 2015 (UTC).
  •  Oppose IMO too much details are missing. And so you can give the image to consensual review. --XRay 16:37, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Good size, but poor quality and detail--Lmbuga 23:28, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Medium69 14:39, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

File:Malle_-_20150802_10h04_(10650).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Malle on the path of Disneyland Railroad, an attraction at Disneyland Paris. -- Medium69 01:49, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 13:31, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree, not sharp enough --Hubertl 09:00, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
  •  OpposeToo unsharp--Ermell 09:42, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, not sharp enough--Lmbuga 22:39, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 07:26, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

File:HRaf.JPG[edit]

  • Nomination Jeune fille de l'Afrique de l'Est. By User:Happiraphael --Geugeor 17:35, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:34, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Comment I disagree: No suitable categories. --Cccefalon 05:19, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose As Cccefalon and strong jpg artifacts. But nice--Lmbuga 22:34, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Categories missing. Filename should be better. --XRay 11:23, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 07:25, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

File:HRfunerailles01.JPG[edit]

  • Nomination Pendant les funérailles, en pays bamiléké. By User:Happiraphael --Geugeor 11:40, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Medium69 14:24, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree: The background is blown out --Cccefalon 05:17, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Cccefalon--Lmbuga 22:31, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Categories missing. Filename should be better. --XRay 11:24, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --XRay 11:24, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

File:Lennuliiklust uurimas.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Exploring the airplane traffic (Martin Mark). Kruusamägi 23:53, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Too noisy. Person blurred. --Cccefalon 07:09, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
     Comment He is picturing stars in the sky and not a landscape in the middle of a sunny day. For a situation like that this anything but noisy. It has clearly better quality than this FP for example. Kruusamägi 14:46, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality for such photos. --El Golli Mohamed 15:41, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
  •  STRONG OPPOSE LivioAndronico
Why? Kruusamägi 11:31, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support OK, there are a few issues, like noise, a helicopter flying through the image and perhaps the person being a little blurred. Still all of that does not justify to not promote the image. IMHO. --Hendric Stattmann 15:15, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
  •  STRONG OPPOSE As LivioAndronico, sorry: poor quality IMO. The larger size is unacceptable IMO--Lmbuga 22:28, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose CA, some coma, noise. This lens seems not to be suitable for images of this kind, if used wide open. --Smial 13:48, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
  •  Strong oppose Per other. --Medium69 18:09, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose → Declined   --Jebulon 17:01, 22 December 2015 (UTC)