Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives February 05 2015

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Poplar DLR station MMB 04 103.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Poplar DLR station. Mattbuck 07:56, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support - Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 18:48, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose - The left side is leaning. Also the train is not sharp. --Steindy 23:57, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
    ✓ Done Mattbuck 18:54, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support --Christian Ferrer 09:35, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --C messier 15:06, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Abbatiale_Saint-Gilles_12.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Abbey of Saint-Gilles, Saint-Gilles, Gard, France. --Christian Ferrer 06:05, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Sorry, I really like most of your pictures, but I think in this case the distortion is simply too strong (and not fixable). --Code 09:04, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
  • I disagree, the distortion is normal  Support, QI to me. --Ralf Roletschek 13:44, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
     Support, QI to me, as Ralf --Milseburg 18:59, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose -- As above and not the best framing -- Alvesgaspar 22:55, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose --Hubertl 22:27, 3 February 2015 (UTC) as above
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Christian Ferrer 17:38, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Calliptamus_barbarus_on_Opuntia_stricta,_Sète_03.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Calliptamus barbarus (Occitan Grasshopper) on a Opuntia stricta (Erect Prickly Pear) --Christian Ferrer 05:53, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Jkadavoor 07:04, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
     Oppose The main subject is too small relative to the total area of the image. --Bff 15:53, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
    acceptable IMO, my subject is a young and have a size of only a few mimimeters high, at this distance it is impossible to have a good DoF thus the sharp area is small, a crop will change nothing --Christian Ferrer 18:48, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Too small and too low DOF. --Steindy 23:50, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Christian Ferrer 17:35, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Calliptamus_barbarus_on_Opuntia_stricta,_Sète_01.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Calliptamus barbarus (Occitan Grasshopper) on a Opuntia stricta (Erect Prickly Pear). --Christian Ferrer 09:06, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:38, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
     Oppose The grasshopper is too small and in many parts not sharp. --Steindy 00:10, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
    It's a young Grasshopper, and it is indeed very small, less than 1 cm long; as you can see on the other images if I get closer the DoF decreases a lot and some other rewiewers will say too small DoF... and regarding the crop it is acceptable, the composition too. It is QI IMO. --Christian Ferrer 06:27, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose in my opinion not QI.--Hubertl 10:44, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Christian Ferrer 17:36, 4 February 2015 (UTC)