Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives February 15 2015

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Ferrari 312P, Bj. 1969 (2011-08-13 B Sp).JPG[edit]

There are more, I think it would be better to change their colour in order to have the same colour as the car instead of grey. Any idea why it is so noisy in ISO 100? --C messier 17:52, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The grey parts are reduced now. But I have no idea what the noise is due to. I hope that Wikipedia:Fotowerkstatt can help. -- Spurzem 21:50, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Söderstadion_January_2015_01.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Former stadium Söderstadion in Stockholm waiting för demolition. --ArildV 12:09, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --C messier 14:21, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Significant CA on left, some blur. --Mattbuck 15:06, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Dnalor 01 16:21, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 14:13, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment @Mattbuck: I don't know what is going on left, I did removed CA with LR. It may be CA or some strange out of focus effect. Anyway, I uploaded a cropped version (without the left part). The main object (the stairs) is sharp and in focus, I don't think some blur in the background is a problem.--ArildV 14:52, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support The cropped version is QI. -- Spurzem 00:27, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted Code 06:32, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

File:AT-13765_Michaelertrakt_-_Fassade_und_Kuppel_-_hu_-_6545.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Figures at the facade of the Michaelertrakt, seen from Michaeler square --Hubertl 17:46, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose overexposed burned out areas --Christian Ferrer 18:17, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. Everything exposed as it should be. See Overexposure vs. Clipping. --Code 19:20, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
    @Ram-Man: thanks for your kind words on that page. As for this image I feel it's a bit iffy, so  Weak support. Mattbuck 00:05, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support IMO QI. --XRay 14:42, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Spurzem 16:50, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 22:20, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support --Dnalor 01 16:16, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Steindy 01:29, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
Total: 7 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted Code 06:33, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Lijiang_Yunnan_China-Evening-atmosphere-in-old-town-Lijiang-01.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Lijiang, Yunnan, China: Evening atmosphere in the old town of Lijiang. --Cccefalon 00:03, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose overexposed --Christian Ferrer 18:35, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support I disagree, it is not at all OVERexposed. --Hubertl 20:11, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Agree with Hubertl, I also do not see that on histogram, and I do not think that the image is overexposed. --Halavar 02:33, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Overexposed? Where? -- Spurzem 16:49, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 22:21, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Dnalor 01 16:25, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support --Code 21:32, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose - Clearly overexposed. An image doesn't have to have #FFFFFF to be overexposed, as many people will remap the white to a grey to try and "fix" it, but as ever the problem is not the presence of white but of the information loss. Mattbuck 23:56, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support --Palauenc05 21:13, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
Total: 7 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted Code 06:34, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Dülmen,_St.-Viktor-Kirche_--_2014_--_3402.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Detail of the church of Saint Viktor, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:26, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:08, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Blurred. --Mattbuck 22:59, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support --Ralf Roletschek 23:11, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose in part blurred --Christian Ferrer 07:58, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support --Hubertl 20:26, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Blurred --Billy69150 20:49, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, but as others. --Hockei 18:47, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined Code 06:37, 14 February 2015 (UTC)