Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives February 16 2017

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:NCDOT_Fort_Fisher_ferry_2.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination The "Fort Fisher" a North Carolina DOT ferry --EoRdE6 16:40, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Unfavorabel crop. --Milseburg 11:12, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
  • But that was intentional to get a clear shot of the name on the boat, this is part of a 10 photo series (of which 3 are on commons) --EoRdE6 17:28, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Voting to oppose for the time being; it looks underexposed, and the crop is not very good - at least it should be reflected in the title/description that this is the bow section only. Even so, part of the bow is also cropped out.--Peulle 11:27, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 23:01, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Lighthouse beside the Montazah garden in Alexandria.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Lighthouse beside the Montazah garden in Alexandria --علاء 21:28, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Too soft, missing most detail on water surface. A pity, it's a nice view. --A.Savin 14:24, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support The motif is chosen very well and interesting. The composition is also convincing. Technically it's ok for QI yet. --Milseburg 22:04, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support Though it is maybe a little bit tilted, this has some visual qualities --Christian Ferrer 12:24, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose - Aren't many of the clouds too blue? The color and texture of the water is weird, too. -- Ikan Kekek 09:26, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Water is devoid of texture. -- King of Hearts 02:52, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 23:02, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

==[edit]

  • Nomination White-thorated Kingfisher near Jargari, Ludhiana district, Punjab --Satdeep Gill 02:05, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:54, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose. Let's discuss. The photo is rather unsharp, and I'm against promotion of near-duplicates. The photo number 03 has the best quality of the series, and should be enough. --A.Savin 04:05, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per A.Savin's argument, which I think is a sound one. -- Ikan Kekek 06:57, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support Nice picture. QI with two megapixels (5,456 × 3,064 pixels. Please resize the photo to two megapixels) --Lmbuga 16:52, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment There is no reason to decline the picture to be similar to another (IMO). See Commons:Image guidelines--Lmbuga 16:55, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment - You are right. To wit: "There is no restriction on the number of similar quality images and there is no formal mechanism for delisting quality images." I have struck my oppose vote. -- Ikan Kekek 10:08, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment If I get you right you are proposing to downsample the image to increase sharpness. While in theory you are right, downsampling can introduce artifacts and is, in my impression, not really appreciated here. -- Renardo la vulpo 21:19, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
  • Downsampling to the minimum size is such a bad idea that it sounds like a sarcastic remark to me. -- Ikan Kekek 13:46, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The colours (WB) are not correct, see https://www.google.de/search?q=White-throated+Kingfisher&client=firefox-b-ab&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiD4Yu1zYPSAhUCIJoKHX4ECE8Q_AUICCgB&biw=1920&bih=880 --Llez 06:09, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
  • For the colours are corrected --Llez 23:16, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
  •  Question - Satdeep Gill, irrespective of whether this photo is promoted or not, could you please make sure all your photos of white-throated kingfishers use "-throated" and not "thorated" in their titles? -- Ikan Kekek 21:54, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment @Ikan Kekek: I have renamed all the images now. Thank you for pointing out the mistake. --Satdeep Gill 01:31, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
  • You're welcome. Weak  Support, taking into account the size of the file. -- Ikan Kekek 00:20, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 23:04, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

==[edit]

  • Nomination White-thorated Kingfisher near Jargari, Ludhiana district, Punjab --Satdeep Gill 02:05, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:37, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose. Let's discuss. The photo is rather unsharp, and I'm against promotion of near-duplicates. The photo number 03 has the best quality of the series, and should be enough. --A.Savin 04:05, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per A.Savin's argument. -- Ikan Kekek 06:58, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support Nice picture. QI with two megapixels (5,456 × 3,064 pixels. Please resize the photo to two megapixels) --Lmbuga 16:51, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The colours (WB) are not correct, see https://www.google.de/search?q=White-throated+Kingfisher&client=firefox-b-ab&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiD4Yu1zYPSAhUCIJoKHX4ECE8Q_AUICCgB&biw=1920&bih=880 --Llez 06:09, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support For the colours are correct now --Llez 23:18, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment @Llez: Do you recommend that I fix WB of the images ? --Satdeep Gill 05:03, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
    •  Comment Yes. I downloaded one of this photos (the FP-nomination) some days ago for checking this and I corrected the balance, so that the throat was white. The result was very good, also the other colours seemed to be brigher. Please try it, not only this, but all pictures --Llez 06:42, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment This one still has the spelling error.--Peulle 11:22, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
  • Not anymore. Weak  Support, taking into account the size of the file. -- Ikan Kekek 00:22, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 23:05, 15 February 2017 (UTC)