Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives February 17 2016
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Farmstead Petutschnig ("Petutschnighube") at Pernach #11, Techelsberg, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:18, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:57, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Trunk of a noyer at Baerndorf, Moosburg, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:18, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:54, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Calvary in Heiligenkreuz, Lower Austria --Hubertl 22:29, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:16, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Naturhistorisches Museum in Vienna, Austria --Hubertl 22:29, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:16, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Footpath into taiga near Inuvik, NT, Canada --Daniel Case 22:11, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:14, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Footpath through taiga near Inuvik, NT, Canada --Daniel Case 22:11, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:14, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Coyote in Bernal Heights, San Francisco. --Frank Schulenburg 21:48, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Fine! --Palauenc05 22:03, 14 February 2016 (UTC) * Comment great documentation too! --Hubertl 22:11, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Juniperus communis, Lofoten, Norway, 2015 September --Ximonic 21:48, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good view of the plant in its environmental context --Daniel Case 22:04, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Autumn at Andstabbvika, Lofoten, Norway, 2015 September --Ximonic 21:48, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Great scenery well-done for the image size --Daniel Case 22:04, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Waterfall at Mengelsdalstinden, Lofoten, Norway, 2015 September --Ximonic 21:48, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion More lovely Lofoten scenery --Daniel Case 22:04, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cloudy Småtindan, Lofoten, Norway, 2015 September --Ximonic 21:48, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Impressive --Daniel Case 22:04, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Residentian in Å, Lofoten, Norway, 2015 September --Ximonic 21:48, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion GQ. --Palauenc05 22:01, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The projection roof of the Strabag Building and a Bruno Gironcoli sculpture in Vienna Austria on July 17th, 2015. --Rftblr 20:05, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:18, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mogiła zbiorowa w lesie na osiedlu Bór w Skarżysku-Kamiennej. --Karol Szapsza 18:59, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Decline Big part of the image totally blown out. The rest is overprocessed. Far, far away from a QI. --Cccefalon 19:06, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Building of the sports club Asociación Deportiva Atlético de Aretxabaleta. Aretxabaleta (Vitoria-Gasteiz), Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 18:28, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 18:53, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gardeleku, Social Centre. Vitoria-Gasteiz, Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 17:25, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 17:28, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bell tower of the Panayia Chrysospiliotissa, Athens. --C messier 16:43, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:01, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Agripas Monument, Acropolis of Athens (tilt/perspective corrected based on the background). --C messier 16:43, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Assuming the tilt is for real --Poco a poco 17:01, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Metropolis of Athens. --C messier 16:43, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Daniel Case 17:09, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Frosted willows (Salix) against the freezing air. Location, Natuurterrein The Famberhorst.
--Famberhorst 16:33, 14 February 2016 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:38, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Nomination Frosted willows (Salix) against the freezing air. Location, Natuurterrein The Famberhorst.
-
- Nomination Diakonievene. Nature of It Fryske Gea.
--Famberhorst 16:33, 14 February 2016 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:38, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Nomination Diakonievene. Nature of It Fryske Gea.
-
- Nomination Church San Pedro in Gardelegi. Vitoria-Gasteiz, Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 16:14, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good detail --Daniel Case 21:56, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church San Pedro in Gardelegi. Vitoria-Gasteiz, Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 16:14, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Good, but both sides leaning in Poco a poco 16:19, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Correction distorts the image too much on the upper side, cannot be corrected satisfactorily. --Basotxerri 20:08, 14 February 2016 (UTC) - Withdrawn
- Nomination Church San Pedro in Gardelegi. Vitoria-Gasteiz, Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 16:14, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Railjet innen, erste Klasse --Ralf Roletschek 15:40, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose too noisy --A.Savin 16:25, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Haapsalu castle (by A.Hiiumaamudeliklubi). Kruusamägi 15:36, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Overexposure at the roof tops. Not fixable. --C messier 16:40, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church Of The Congregation Of Maria Magdalena, Haapsalu (by A.Hiiumaamudeliklubi). Kruusamägi 15:36, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Overexposure at the roof tops. Not fixable. --C messier 16:40, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ship "Hiiumaa" (by A.Hiiumaamudeliklubi). Kruusamägi 15:36, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:15, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination France, Nancy, Basilique Saint-Epvre --Berthold Werner 15:09, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Zcebeci 15:42, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Berliner Fernsehturm. --Code 15:02, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:17, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bell tower of Rotes Rathaus in Berlin-Mitte. --Code 15:02, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Good but tilted ccw Poco a poco 16:13, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Done I rotated it a little bit. More would be too much, I think. --Code 18:40, 14 February 2016 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:48, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Nomination Bell tower of Rotes Rathaus in Berlin-Mitte. --Code 15:02, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Detail of the east facade of Rotes Rathaus in Berlin. --Code 15:02, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:17, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dorfkirche Stralau (1). --Code 15:02, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:17, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dorfkirche Stralau (2). --Code 15:02, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:17, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination DLR SpaceLiner Mockup --SkywalkerPL 14:56, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Decline Not the work of a Commoner, sorry, not eligible. --Poco a poco 15:01, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Matt Taylor, ESA Scientist --SkywalkerPL 14:56, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Decline Not the work of a Commoner. --Code 15:09, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Two variants of Ariane 6, vector --SkywalkerPL 14:56, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 16:50, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Common Kingfisher (Alcedo atthis). Seyhan, Adana - Turkey. --Zcebeci 14:24, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:01, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Common Kingfisher (Alcedo atthis). Seyhan, Adana - Turkey. --Zcebeci 14:24, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Very good quality. --Johann Jaritz 14:35, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Donau-City in Vienna, Austria from the Reichsbrücke on August 7th, 2015. --Rftblr 14:20, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Olaf Kosinsky 14:21, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Baden-Baden: view towards Merkur hill --A.Savin 13:41, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 13:58, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Baden-Baden: Stiftskirche / Catholic church --A.Savin 13:41, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Nice --Poco a poco 15:01, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Baden-Baden: Roman-style well --A.Savin 13:41, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:01, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Panoramic Photo of the Donau City Vienna taken from the south-west on April 22, 2009. --Rftblr 13:30, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 13:32, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Nicola Beer, member of the Landtag of Hesse --Olaf Kosinsky 13:13, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 13:28, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Anne Schierenbeck, member of the Bürgerschaft of Bremen --Olaf Kosinsky 13:11, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 13:28, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rainer Bensch, member of the Bürgerschaft of Bremen --Olaf Kosinsky 13:08, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 13:28, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kirsten Kappert-Gonther, member of the Bürgerschaft of Bremen --Olaf Kosinsky 13:08, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 13:28, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Manuela Mahnke, member of the Bürgerschaft of Bremen --Olaf Kosinsky 13:08, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 13:28, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rangierlok Öbb 2070 im Innbrucker Hauptbahnhof --Ralf Roletschek 12:13, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Olaf Kosinsky 13:02, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rangierlok Öbb 2070 im Innbrucker Hauptbahnhof --Ralf Roletschek 12:13, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:42, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Poschiavo, Switzerland: Piazza comunale in Poschiavo, Switzerland. --Cayambe 11:49, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion * Support --Johann Jaritz 11:55, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View to Yuzhnoportovy District from Andropova Avenue in Moscow --Florstein 10:43, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:40, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kazansky Cathedral in Moscow --Florstein 10:43, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:40, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Otmuchów Castle 1 --Jacek Halicki 09:09, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 09:20, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Otmuchów Castle 2 --Jacek Halicki 09:09, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Florstein 10:43, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Otmuchów Castle 3 --Jacek Halicki 09:09, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Florstein 10:43, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Otmuchów Castle, park 1 --Jacek Halicki 09:09, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Florstein 10:43, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Otmuchów Castle, park 2 --Jacek Halicki 09:09, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 09:20, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Baptismal font in the Church of the Redeemer in Bamberg --Ermell 08:59, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:16, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Altar with crucifix in Erlöserkirche in Bamberg --Ermell 08:59, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:16, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tag at the lower castle in Thurnau --Ermell 08:59, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:16, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Komatsu PC240 at the ICE construction site Nuremberg-Erfurt high-speed railway in Unteroberndorf --Ermell 08:59, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:16, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Railway from Triptis to Marxgrün --Ermell 08:59, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:39, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hengchun Township, Taiwan: Marker Stone next to the southernmost point of Taiwan --Cccefalon 07:30, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:14, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tainan, Taiwan: Bank of Taiwan, Tainan Branch. --Cccefalon 07:30, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:14, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Taroko Gorge, Hualien, Taiwan: Tianxiang Police Station --Cccefalon 07:30, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good composion with mountains in background, sharp enough a Q1photo --Michielverbeek 07:35, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Papar, Sabah: House of Basel Christian Church of Malaysia --Cccefalon 07:30, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:14, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tainan, Taiwan: Taiwan High Court Tainan Branch Court. --Cccefalon 07:30, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:05, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The exterior of Union Station in Paris, Texas (United States). --Michael Barera 05:59, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:53, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The exterior of Union Station in Paris, Texas (United States). --Michael Barera 05:59, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:15, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The exterior of Union Station in Paris, Texas (United States). --Michael Barera 05:59, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:09, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The exterior of Union Station in Paris, Texas (United States). --Michael Barera 05:59, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:41, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The exterior of Union Station in Paris, Texas (United States). --Michael Barera 05:59, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:41, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Diakonievene. Nature of It Fryske Gea in the Netherlands.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:55, 14 February 2016 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:01, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Nomination Diakonievene. Nature of It Fryske Gea in the Netherlands.
-
- Nomination Mountain hike of Gimillan (1805m.) At Colle Tsa Sètse Cogne Valley (Italy).
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:55, 14 February 2016 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:01, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Nomination Mountain hike of Gimillan (1805m.) At Colle Tsa Sètse Cogne Valley (Italy).
-
- Nomination Lorenkenturm, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:52, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:00, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination “Mill” pond and castle Moosburg in the background, Moosburg, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 04:59, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:14, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Southeastern view at chapel and portal of castle Moosburg, Moosburg, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 04:59, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:12, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Belltower of the parish church Saints Michael and George, Moosburg, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 04:59, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:58, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pulpit at the parish church Saints Michael and George, Moosburg, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 04:59, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 06:30, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Roman Catholic rectory on Gaisrueckenstrasse #2, Moosburg, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 04:59, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Weak Support Good quality, but the roof top right is a little bit disturbing. --XRay 06:30, 14 February 2016 (UTC) Fixed Thanks, Dietmar, for your promotion. I cloned the disturbing edge of the roof out. --Johann Jaritz 07:05, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Artwork (Acrylic glass, Petra Grosche) at the office building of the Vermessungsbüro Drerup, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:11, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:44, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View of Chemiepark Mark from Dorstener Straße near Lippramsdorf, Haltern am See, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:11, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:44, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Westfälisches Römermuseum Haltern, Haltern am See, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:11, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:14, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Daurian redstart (female) in Sakai, Osaka. --Laitche 03:07, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:06, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Little grebe in Sakai, Osaka. --Laitche 03:07, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:06, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Statue of Jesus on the top of the Saint John the Baptist Church, Catacaos, Peru --Bgag 01:10, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:06, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Statue of Saint Andrew on the top of the Saint John the Baptist Church, Catacaos, Peru --Bgag 01:10, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:02, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Giralda, Seville, Spain --Poco a poco 00:18, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:17, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Altes Stadthaus (Berlin) as seen from west. --Code 22:28, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:38, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination La plage de La Tranche-sur-Mer, Vendée, France.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 21:48, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Clearly tilted, see sea horizon Poco a poco 22:17, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Done rotation - 1°20, thank you for your review.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 09:37, 14 February 2016 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:53, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Nomination La plage de La Tranche-sur-Mer, Vendée, France.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 21:48, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination La plage de La Tranche-sur-Mer, Vendée, France.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 21:48, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
- Withdrawn unsharp --A.Savin 13:19, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
I withdraw my nominationOKnot QI, thank you for your review.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 14:07, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Nomination La plage de La Tranche-sur-Mer, Vendée, France.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 21:48, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Josef Seegen (1822-1904), bust (marble) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna --Hubertl 21:37, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:36, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Frosted sprig of oak (Quercus robur). Location, Natuurterrein The Famberhorst.
--Famberhorst 16:27, 10 February 2016 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --A.Savin 13:28, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Nomination Frosted sprig of oak (Quercus robur). Location, Natuurterrein The Famberhorst.
-
- Nomination Monastery of Santa María de Huerta, Santa María de Huerta Soria, Spain --Poco a poco 02:48, 9 February 2016 (UTC) Comment
Very good quality but only a few Ca´s left in the top corners--Ermell 08:11, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
Done Poco a poco 19:41, 13 February 2016 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 20:30, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Nomination Monastery of Santa María de Huerta, Santa María de Huerta Soria, Spain --Poco a poco 02:48, 9 February 2016 (UTC) Comment
-
- Nomination Reflection in sunglasses --F. Riedelio 13:18, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Michael Barera 05:57, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Woody from Toy Story at the Disney Magic On Parade in Disneyland Paris. -- Medium69 12:30, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. Very nice! --Michael Barera 05:57, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Disney Character illustrating Pinocchio at the Disney Magic On Parade in Disneyland Paris. -- Medium69 12:30, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Weir on the Grialëces creek in St. Ulrich in Gröden --Moroder 09:17, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Michael Barera 05:54, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Catholic daughter church St. Nantovinus. --F. Riedelio 08:37, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. Sharp enough for QI. --Michael Barera 05:54, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Miraculous image Patrona Spirensis (Speyer Lady). --F. Riedelio 16:31, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
- Decline
Comment Noisy --Moroder 13:26, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Done Uploaded new version with improved noise. --F. Riedelio 12:53, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
Insufficient quality. Sorry but it is still noisy and unsharp imo --Moroder 18:27, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Consensual review[edit]
File:2015-10-24_Karmelitermarket_on_saturday,_Vienna_0684.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Farmersmarket on a saturday at the Karmelitermarkt, Vienna --Hubertl 21:37, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:46, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Oppose Chromatic aberrations. --A.Savin 23:10, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
- Fixed --Hubertl 23:57, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Ralf Roletschek 10:04, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Support Good rework. -- Smial 11:01, 14 February 2016 (UTC) @Hubertl: Versuch mal, bei solchen Motiven das Weitwinkel nicht für "muß alles draufpassen" zu verwenden, sondern greif dir ein aussagekräftiges Vordergrundmotiv heraus, hier z.B. die Obstkisten beim Stand in der Bildmitte. Und spiele dann mit der Blende, also ruhig auch mal Offenblende beim WW versuchen. Wenn die Bildecken dann unscharf werden, spielt das keine Rolle, hauptsache das zentrale Thema wird scharf.
- Support OK now. --A.Savin 13:17, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Caballero1967 21:08, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted --Hubertl 18:21, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
File:Cementerio_judío,_Tánger,_Marruecos,_2015-12-11,_DD_30.JPG[edit]
- Nomination Jewish cemetery, Tangier, Morocco --Poco a poco 06:33, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Comment Yet tilted ccw. And perhaps brightening the darks of the trees? --Cccefalon 07:05, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
- Support Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:21, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Oppose This is my unnecessary oppose, Jacek. It is good practice here not to override a reviewers request to the author. --Cccefalon 09:49, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
- Re:Cccefalon Sorry, I did not notice your comment. --Jacek Halicki 16:47, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
- Re:Cccefalon Sorry, I did not notice your comment. --Jacek Halicki 16:47, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
- New version Poco a poco 19:32, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
- Support Good quality, Diego. --Cccefalon 10:07, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted --Hubertl 18:22, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
File:Kazan_Cathedral_Saint_Petersburg.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Kazan Cathedral in Saint Petersburg 1905. --Moroder 18:48, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Oppose Badly posterized sky. A pity, as this could have been a wow motif --A.Savin 19:06, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Comment I'd like some other opinion --Moroder 17:34, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
- Support Good quality --Shansov.net 18:51, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
- Oh really? --A.Savin 23:13, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
- Support Ok for me --Uoaei1 20:21, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
- Comment 1. Are there stars on the sky or matrix defects? 2. The right side of the cathedral leaning a bit. 3. What mean of 1905? --Florstein 21:42, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Need perspective correction...--Livioandronico2013 17:34, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Done I can't do better than this, folks --Moroder 17:59, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Support I find it better than good. --Caballero1967 21:03, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Hubertl 18:23, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
File:Eiffel tower (368).JPG[edit]
- Nomination Eiffel Tower in Paris, France --Rijinatwiki 08:09, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 21:26, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Many chromatic aberrations. The tower is also leaning left a bit --A.Savin 17:20, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose CAs and disturbing branches at the left. Composition could be better, dark area at the right.--XRay 18:02, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose CA, tilt. -- Smial 10:52, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined --Hubertl 18:23, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
File:2014_08_18_007_Weingut_Kimich_Deidesheim.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Winery Kimich --F. Riedelio 13:16, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
- Decline
- SupportGood quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:36, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
- OpposeSky overexposed and eating in to neighbouring detail, otherwise good. --Prosthetic Head 16:59, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Overexposed sky --A.Savin 13:30, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined --Hubertl 18:24, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
File:2014_Stary_Paczków,_kościół_Wszystkich_Świętych_02.JPG[edit]
- Nomination Church of All Saints in Stary Paczków 1 --Jacek Halicki 00:22, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 12:54, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose The sky is nearly completely blown. Please discuss. --C messier 14:56, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose I'm sorry Jacek but I agree to Cmessier, the sky does not look nice --Michielverbeek 07:52, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Livioandronico2013 21:23, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Support Cloudy sky is ok for me.--Ermell 09:14, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Burnt sky, not fixable. -- Smial 09:59, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
- Support Sometimes the sky looks like this. The building is fine. --Palauenc05 15:22, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
- Comment The sky has been faked, and has massive overxposure, but if you think, this is ok for QI then it shall be so. -- Smial 20:26, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Burnt sky, crop is too tight at the top. This is not a QI. --Code 22:00, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Code --A.Savin 13:32, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose → Declined --Hubertl 18:25, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
File:May2015 Volgograd img06 View from Mamaev Hill.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Volgograd: view from Mamaev Hill --A.Savin 15:41, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Oppose Insufficient quality: An unfavourable image section (too much foreground), right edge of the image is out of focus. --F. Riedelio 08:06, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Sorry please other opinion: it is the view as it is at this point, and where do you see any blurred areas? --A.Savin 14:28, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- @A.Savin: Please see annotations. --F. Riedelio 13:45, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Sorry please other opinion: it is the view as it is at this point, and where do you see any blurred areas? --A.Savin 14:28, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- I understand your issues very well, but I don't get the problem. --A.Savin 16:04, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- @A.Savin: Please see annotations for my preferred cropping. --F. Riedelio 09:00, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
- Support I would say too much sky, but the horizon is at the one third of the image. The composition actually lies at thirds (one sky, one city, one foreground). The lack of sharpness descripted isn't something worth declining (or mentioning). --C messier 15:37, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- Support For me is good --Livioandronico2013 21:24, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Шухрат Саъдиев 13:23, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Overall somewhat weak sharpness, blurred details at margins. No double standards, please. -- Smial 18:23, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
- I never nominate pictures without looking if they are sharp enough. That you ape my comment is just stupid, however quite your usual level (Deutsche Wikipedia as it is). --A.Savin 19:15, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
- That's exactly your double standards. q.e.d. ;-) -- Smial 08:09, 12 February 2016 (UTC) Ps: In other words: And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye? ;-)
- Matthaeus 7:3, wenn schon, denn schon.. ;-) --Hubertl 09:54, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
- @Smial Once again: where do you see double standards by me? This picture I nominated IS sharp enough! Where did you see me ever nominate or promote pictures below QI standard? Is it not rather your best friend Ralf Roletschek who usually does this? Why then, if you are such a big fan of high-quality standards, do you tolerate it - only because he is your friend, yeah? Let me guess... Double standards? And could you please stop lying? Otherwise, we also may continue discussing on COM:ANU, if you prefer... --A.Savin 11:47, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
- ...except for your Moscow metro series? :) This image is sharp enough for an OOC jpeg from a camera with Bayer sensor (which is not sharp enough for my PERSONAL taste) --Shansov.net 13:27, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
- You must have confused me with s/o else, I have no "Moscow Metro series" and did just a very few photos in Moscow Metro. --A.Savin 13:31, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
- That's exactly your double standards. q.e.d. ;-) -- Smial 08:09, 12 February 2016 (UTC) Ps: In other words: And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye? ;-)
- I never nominate pictures without looking if they are sharp enough. That you ape my comment is just stupid, however quite your usual level (Deutsche Wikipedia as it is). --A.Savin 19:15, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
- Comment I agree with F. Riedelio that it should be cropped. My suggestion: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/106488912/May2015_Volgograd_img06_View_from_Mamaev_Hill.jpg --Rftblr
- Done 16:9 --A.Savin 13:26, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose as Smial and F. Riedelio. And of course our utmost best friend Ralf Roletschek. If you cannot accept critical, but well-meaning reviews, this is maybe not the right project for you, A.Savin. --Hubertl 13:20, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
- Do you also have your own opinion, or is it just because Smial said so? --A.Savin 13:26, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
- Support OK to me. --Florstein 21:51, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Promoted --Hubertl 09:23, 16 February 2016 (UTC)