Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives February 25 2014

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Parroquia_de_Santa_Clara_de_Asís,_Puebla,_México,_2013-10-11,_DD_07.JPG[edit]

  • Nomination Parish of St Clara of Assisi, Puebla, Mexico --Poco a poco 11:35, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Interesante prespectiva de las lineas internas. --Ivan2010 12:16, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
     Oppose I disagree because of severe perspective issues --Uoaei1 21:52, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support good perspective, please dont distort it. --Ralf Roletschek 11:50, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support As per the comments above, the use of perspective makes the image more impressive. Looks good to me. --DAJF 03:23, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --JLPC 08:49, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Puente_romano_Cangas.JPG[edit]

  • Nomination Puente romano de Cangas de Onís, Asturias (Spain) --Alan 20:53, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline  Support Hermosa composicion. --Ivan2010 08:27, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Subject too dark, burnt sky. --Kadellar 20:06, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose As for Kadellar. Noisy too. -- Smial 10:01, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per others. --Cayambe 13:40, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
  •  Comment I dont know, I like this picture, however, of course my vote not count :P --The Photographer 19:51, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
    • The composition is very nice, but the image has too many technical flaws, sorry. -- Smial 22:56, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Hauptplatz Linz September 2013.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination The main square of Linz, capital of Upper Austria, with the Holy Trinity column. -- Felix Koenig 16:17, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion The blue colour balance is IMHO not optimal: The forest is bearing too much cyan and there is magenta in the wires. Can you try to work on that? --Cccefalon 17:42, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
     Not done --Cccefalon 15:32, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
    I didn't fix anything because I couldn't identify what you meant (there is not even forest in the picture). Let's discuss. -- Felix Koenig 21:13, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
    You are talking of another photo? The one, I reviewed has a forest. I made annotations. I just wonder, why you kept silent, before I declined ... --Cccefalon 21:53, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
    Why I kept silent? If a reviewer mentions "problems" which are not visible to the naked eye, there are 2 options: fuss or ignore. I decided to ignore. Referring to your "too much cyan", I recommend reading the article fog. Sorry if you feel mocked, but I can't take that serious. Felix Koenig 17:18, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support QI IMO Christian Ferrer 05:09, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Weak  Support. Somewhat oversharpened (halos around wires), small remains of CA. Good lighting and composition. Colours are perfect, I don't understand the jokes with trees and cyan etc. -- Smial 10:09, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support yes, cyan on part of the wire and forest somewhat bluisch in the far distance... but overall QI to me. --Cayambe 13:38, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support --Ralf Roletschek 11:51, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support Looks good quality to me. --DAJF 06:24, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --DAJF 06:24, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Transport_in_Maracaibo_city.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Transport in Maracaibo city --The Photographer 02:36, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 06:31, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose burnt sky, messy composition, cut edge at the very left --A.Savin 17:04, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
 Comment Perhaps the factor that is one of the most dangerous cities in the world could be considered. I only have a few seconds to take a photo and run. --The Photographer 19:53, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
QI is not concerned with extenuating circumstances. Either the image is good or it isn't, how difficult it was to capture is not the point - that is for VI. Mattbuck 22:05, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Agree with the comment above about the blown-out sky. Also, the problem with the left-hand edge does not appear to have been fixed. --DAJF 03:14, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --DAJF 03:14, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

File:14-02-04-Parlement-européen-Strasbourg-RalfR-008.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Number Plate of diplomatic Corps of Luxembourgh --Ralf Roletschek 20:56, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Good quality. --JLPC 18:50, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Purple CA, especially on right, bad crop bottom right. --Mattbuck 18:12, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Agree with the comment above that the cropping at the bottom right was just too tight. --DAJF 03:10, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --DAJF 03:10, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Tunstall Piperfon Connect.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Tunstall Piperfon Connect medical alarm device --Florian Fuchs 09:09, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support OK, even though it would have been better to have all in focus. --Pleclown 12:48, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
     Opposeirritating reflection of the subject --Sebastian Wallroth 14:38, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
    Why is the reflection irritating? I created this on purpose because I wanted to make a picture of an object that is not so typically boring. --Florian Fuchs 08:04, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality and interesting composition. --EveryPicture 11:34, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support Interesting idea and good quality. -- Felix Koenig 13:23, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality image. --DAJF 01:36, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   -- DAJF 01:36, 25 February 2014 (UTC)