Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 03 2024

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Alcazaba,_Málaga,_España,_2023-05-20,_DD_86-88_HDR.jpg[edit]

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Mike Peel 06:12, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Close_Wing_Basking_of_Symphaedra_nais_(Forster,_1771)_-_Baronet_WLB_DSC_2743a.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Close Wing Basking of Symphaedra nais (Forster, 1771) - Baronet--TAPAN1412 14:48, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Ok --Poco a poco 17:14, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose too much obscured behind leaf --Charlesjsharp 20:29, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
  •  Weak support Weak because of the image quality itself. Leaf is IMO not an issue. --Plozessor 11:51, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
  •  Weak support ajaj with EXIF, but fine anyway.
    Unsigned vote stricken. Only signed votes are valid. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 18:02, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support. Beautiful and technical good photo -- Spurzem 15:25, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Definitely good enough for QI. --Kritzolina 18:48, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Taken in a natural environment. Good enough for QI ImO. --Cayambe 09:44, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 18:18, 2 January 2024 (UTC)