Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 10 2014
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination City Tower Vienna, Justizzentrum Wien-Mitte --P e z i 20:35, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Rather extrem perspective but interesting and good qualtiy. --Tuxyso 23:01, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Comment thanks for review. For the perspective: Have a look at EXIF; this is the upper half of a 36MP horizontally taken. --P e z i 23:10, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
no critic,just a comment. I like this shift look known from T&S lenses. --Tuxyso 23:37, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Zollkanal --Alchemist-hp 20:31, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality (and very nice pic). --P e z i 21:25, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination An old carwreck in the Outback, Queensland --Alchemist-hp 20:29, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --P e z i 21:41, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Austrian Academy of Sciences, cultural heritage monument --P e z i 17:03, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:23, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Arran Brown (Erebia ligea), Reitzenhain, Germany --LC-de 16:27, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Disturbing flower in the foreground, sorry --Poco a poco 17:23, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sedum 'Drachenblut' .40 cm high. wine red flowers.--
Famberhorst 16:02, 7 January 2014 (UTC) - Decline Oppose Poor composition (also not sharp enough IMO,
poor clarity and contrast IMO)--Lmbuga 20:46, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
poor detail IMO--Lmbuga 21:02, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination Sedum 'Drachenblut' .40 cm high. wine red flowers.--
-
- Nomination Ringlet (Aphantopus hyperantus), Reitzenhain, Germany --LC-de 16:02, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:28, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cape Greco (Κάβο Γκρέκο) - National Park, Cyprus--Anna Anichkova 15:35, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:28, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination National Museum in Poznań, Poland --A.Savin 15:03, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:23, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination University Aula (Collegium Minus) in Poznań, Poland --A.Savin 15:03, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Nice --Poco a poco 17:23, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Old Market in Poznań, Poland --A.Savin 15:03, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support ok --Christian Ferrer 19:36, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Roscheider Hof Open Air Museum, Farmers' and craftsmen's day --Berthold Werner 12:20, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Bad crop (righrt and bottom), she is not sharp, perspective problems, not a QI IMO, sorry --Poco a poco 17:28, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Detail of a Gharial Snout --Nireekshit 11:47, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Low quality, noise --The Photographer 18:54, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Engolasters, Andorra --Poco a poco 10:42, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--ArildV 12:13, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Café, Botanical Garden, Munich, Germany --Poco a poco 10:42, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --P e z i 16:14, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bayon, Angkor, Cambodia --Poco a poco 10:42, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Some motion blur in trees but main subject is focus. Well done --The Photographer 20:29, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Motorbike in Al Ahmed St, Doha, Qatar --Poco a poco 10:42, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Main subject sharp and interesting --The Photographer 20:29, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View of Moros, Zaragoza, Spain --Poco a poco 10:42, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support very nice, FPC? --A.Savin 14:50, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Thanks, will follow your advice :) Poco a poco 01:08, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tapu Island, Phuket, Thailand --Poco a poco 10:42, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Inclinada (ver nota), suficiente calidad para mi. Recomiendo un ISO 200 o 300, para no observar ese desenfoque mínimo de movimiento en los arboles (Para futura referencia). Si la inclinación es corregida, es suficiente para mi --The Photographer 15:50, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Done, thanks, Poco a poco 23:41, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saigon river, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam --Poco a poco 10:42, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support good --A.Savin 14:48, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination "Memento mori", church Santa Maria del Popolo, Rome, Italy.--Jebulon 10:18, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Pretty :) --Poco a poco 11:11, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Nativity with St.Jerome, fresco by Pinturicchio, church Santa Maria del Popolo, Rome, Italy.--Jebulon 09:56, 7 January 2014 (UTC) Comment Nice, but imo if you can't fix the crop at the bottom I'd give an overall tighter crom, I repeat imo. QI anyway --
94.164.60.190sorry, --Moroder 01:46, 7 January 2014 (UTC)00:49, 7 January 2014 (UTC) - Promotion
- Nomination Nativity with St.Jerome, fresco by Pinturicchio, church Santa Maria del Popolo, Rome, Italy.--Jebulon 09:56, 7 January 2014 (UTC) Comment Nice, but imo if you can't fix the crop at the bottom I'd give an overall tighter crom, I repeat imo. QI anyway --
-
- Nomination Leptoglossus occidentalis --Archaeodontosaurus 08:10, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:11, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Grass by the River Trym, Bristol. Mattbuck 08:05, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Unidentified species --Poco a poco 11:11, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 1995 stock at Kings Cross. Mattbuck 08:05, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:21, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Knabs Ridge Wind Farm. Mattbuck 08:05, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Motion blur (overall not only the vanes) --Poco a poco 11:11, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Whitby Abbey. Mattbuck 08:05, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
- Withdrawn Structure is cut on top, blurred zones (see notes) and ned ++EV --The Photographer 15:46, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Not QI. Mattbuck 21:14, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Groomed skirun from mount Seceda in Gröden --Moroder 07:17, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:21, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Santa Monica Beach, California, USA --XRay 07:12, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:11, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Star "Harry Belafonte" at the Hollywood Walk of Fame, Los Angeles, California --XRay 07:12, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:21, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Car at the parade "700 Jahre Stadt Dülmen" in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 07:12, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Low quality Oof --The Photographer 18:04, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Montgolfiade 2004 in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 07:12, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
- Decline This one is a bit blurry IMO --Poco a poco 11:21, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sète, Hérault, France. --Christian Ferrer 05:48, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support ok --A.Savin 14:44, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Slums in Venezuela --The Photographer 19:00, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support The quality is average or perhaps less than average IMO, but nice. It's not a very good shot--Lmbuga 20:23, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Amphora borer beetle (Megacyllene decora) that was photographed in northeast Oklahoma (by User:Goody0033). ArionEstar 16:09, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:41, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Denkmalschutzbereich D 0001, Zechensiedlung Dortmund-Oberdorstfeld, Baudenkmal # A0767 --Smial 15:58, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Strong chromatic aberration and car is disturbing, please, see notes --The Photographer 15:44, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Denkmalschutzbereich D 0001, Zechensiedlung Dortmund-Oberdorstfeld, Listeneintrag A0770 --Smial 15:58, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --The Photographer 18:12, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Denkmalschutzbereich D 0001, Zechensiedlung Dortmund-Oberdorstfeld --Smial 15:58, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --The Photographer 18:12, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Denkmalschutzbereich D 0001, Zechensiedlung Dortmund-Oberdorstfeld --Smial 15:58, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
- Decline chromatic aberration in tree --The Photographer 18:12, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Denkmalschutzbereich D 0001, Zechensiedlung Dortmund-Oberdorstfeld, Listeneintrag A 0783 --Smial 15:58, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
It is tilted Poco a poco 19:54, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
Can you tell me in which direction? -- Smial 20:55, 6 January 2014 (UTC) - Promotion I take it back, QI --Poco a poco 11:24, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination Denkmalschutzbereich D 0001, Zechensiedlung Dortmund-Oberdorstfeld, Listeneintrag A 0783 --Smial 15:58, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Northern rough greensnake (Opheodrys aestivus), photographed in northeast Oklahoma (by User:Goody0033). ArionEstar 15:48, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Nice composition and subject but , sorry, too much noise and poor detail to be QI IMO--Lmbuga 20:06, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Großer Blaupfeil - Orthetrum cancellatum, Männchen (male) --Hockei 13:10, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Sharpen and quality, well done --The Photographer 18:57, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Trier, employment agency --Berthold Werner 12:42, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --P e z i 22:02, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Street mushrooms sellers, Pachuca, Hidalgo, Mexico --Poco a poco 07:23, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion QI for me, some motion blur in hand. Nice put. Where are permision for this picture? --The Photographer 20:02, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
I showed her the picture and agreed, I added a template for PR Poco a poco 11:28, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Nice practice, well done. Its important permision --The Photographer 20:25, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cactus (Opuntia ficus-indica), archeological area of Cantona, Puebla, Mexico --Poco a poco 07:23, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support QI for me, but too tight at bottom IMO--Lmbuga 19:54, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mourèze, Hérault, France. --Christian Ferrer 06:11, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Nice and good (perhaps very good)--Lmbuga 19:57, 7 January 2014 (UTC).
-
- Nomination Aerial photo of Friedrich Wilhems-Hütte (metallurgical plant), view west --Tuxyso 09:24, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good, still some more contrast would be better --Poco a poco 12:21, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
Done Better? --Tuxyso 14:47, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
Indeed Poco a poco 11:43, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Schloss Raesfeld. By User:Tobwie --XRay 19:57, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
- Withdrawn Please check the proportions. The buildings seem to be a little too broad at the top. --Dirtsc 20:03, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Sorry, I can't update the image. It is not my picture.--XRay 13:44, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Geology of Hurum in the Oslo Fjord --Bjoertvedt 14:58, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Insufficient quality. Sorry. Not sharp enough and the horizon isn't even. --XRay 13:41, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Breaking wave and a lighthouse in Porto Covo, Portugal -- Alvesgaspar 21:48, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --The Photographer 18:21, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kungsgatan, Stockholm. --ArildV 21:37, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Excellent --The Photographer 18:21, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Polish musician Wojciech Waglewski. --Francesco 13 20:18, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Low quality generalized and noise, I am sorry --The Photographer 18:21, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Polish artist, writer and blogger Kika Szaszkiewiczowa. --Francesco 13 20:20, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Low quality and noise, maybe camera sensor --The Photographer 18:25, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination German criminologist Dieter Schenk. --Francesco 13 20:14, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Low quality and noise, maybe camera sensor --The Photographer 18:25, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Deir Qeruh, Archaeology site in Golan Height --Staselnik 19:59, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --The Photographer 18:34, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Statues of Saints Joachim, Anne with Mary and Child, and Joseph, above an entrance of the cathedral, Aachen, Germany.--Jebulon 16:08, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Some minimal chromatic aberration over there. But its ok --The Photographer 18:34, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The side entrance of the church "Leiden Christi" in Obermenzing, Munich. --High Contrast 21:51, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion OK. --Mattbuck 20:18, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ta Som, Angkor, Cambodia --Poco a poco 19:56, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion OK. --Mattbuck 20:18, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Marsh frog (Pelophylax ridibundus), botanical Garden, Munich, Germany --Poco a poco 19:56, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Nice. --Mattbuck 20:18, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bayon, Angkor Thom, Cambodia --Poco a poco 19:56, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Not really sharp IMO. --Mattbuck 20:18, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fireworks in Belfort, France. --ComputerHotline 16:38, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Overexposed IMO. --Mattbuck 20:18, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fireworks in Belfort, France. --ComputerHotline 16:38, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Mattbuck 20:18, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fireworks in Belfort, France. --ComputerHotline 16:26, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Mattbuck 20:18, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fireworks in Belfort, France. --ComputerHotline 16:26, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Overexposed IMO. --Mattbuck 20:18, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fireworks in Belfort, France. --ComputerHotline 16:26, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Mattbuck 20:18, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fireworks in Belfort, France. --ComputerHotline 16:26, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Mattbuck 20:18, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lombard Street in San Francisco, California, USA --XRay 10:59, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Comment BTW: Perspective is not corrected, because this would change the appearance (gradient of the road) of the image.--XRay 11:02, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
Overexposure, wires spoil it. --Mattbuck 20:18, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination St Luke's Church, Abercarn. --Lewis Hulbert 23:12, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
- Decline Unsharp on the left and a bit dark. --Mattbuck 20:11, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Graffiti on the walls of St Luke's Church, Abercarn --Lewis Hulbert 23:12, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
- Decline Unsharp. --Mattbuck 20:11, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View from Löwenstein on Breitenau Lake and Obersulm (Baden-Württemberg). -- Felix Koenig 15:24, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion OK --Pleclown 12:52, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ta Phrom, Angkor, Cambodia --Poco a poco 09:04, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Support ok --Christian Ferrer 19:25, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Phimeanakas, Angkor Thom, Cambodia --Poco a poco 09:04, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Support good --Christian Ferrer 19:25, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mebon Oriental, Angkor, Cambodia --Poco a poco 09:04, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Ok for QI but need perspective correction (leaning outwards).--ArildV 15:22, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Done Poco a poco 21:19, 2 January 2014 (UTC) Support--ArildV 11:57, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The grape Madonna (1470/80 - flashed) in the church Maria Himmelfahrt in the monastery Fürstenfeld. --Mummelgrummel 16:38, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
- Decline Comment I don't know... Pleclown 12:42, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
I say no due to harsh flash shadow from the candle. Mattbuck 20:02, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Upper Silesian Ethnographic Park --Nemo5576 15:20, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
- Decline Please leave a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries. And provide various names in your nominations in order to help reviewers. Thank you.--Jebulon 15:30, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
Comment All your nominated pictures need an English description --Moroder 16:40, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
Not sharp and a little bit overexposed on the grass. Pleclown 12:42, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The City Hall in Kazimierz district of Krakow --Jakubhal 22:42, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
- Withdrawn Some CAs at the left side of the building. I would try to reduce noice on the sky. --Tuxyso 07:54, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
new version Corrected, both CAs and noise. --Jakubhal 17:35, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
Noise is better. CAs are still there (see note). Also perspective problem at the left. --Tuxyso 18:15, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
new version Corrected --Jakubhal 20:15, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
Unsharp on left IMO. Mattbuck 19:57, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Withdrawn for now --Jakubhal 23:35, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dew on couch grass.--Urmas83 11:46, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment A good image, but IMO another (smaller) crop could be useful.--XRay 08:50, 6 January 2014 (UTC) I cropped it smaller but just a little bit. I not sure if I like more the grass in the foreground or the bokeh at the backgroung. Maybe this is not a right place for this image. --Urmas83 13:28, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Seems ok. Mattbuck 19:57, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tadeusz blazusiak at the barcelona-Catalonia-Spain-2011 indoor enduro --Alberto-g-rovi 05:33, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
- Decline Comment IMO the image needs perspective correction.--XRay 08:43, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
Oppose due to ISO JPEG artifacts. Mattbuck 19:57, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Montane Birches at the tree line in Torkilstöten. Berg municipality, Jämtland County, Sweden. --ArildV 13:24, 27 December 2013 (UTC) Comment I think this image needs and deserves a better description (also technical) --Moroder 17:09, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Done--ArildV 18:10, 29 December 2013 (UTC) Comment Imo it's underexposed (easy to fix). Why did you convert it to b/w? It's obviously your right to do it but I am curious --Moroder 21:55, 30 December 2013 (UTC) Done I had uploaded some similar pictures in color, but I thought black and white was adequate for the landscape (which had few colors already) and draws attention to the trees and lines in the landscape. I have some interest in black-and-white photograph, although I mainly use my analog camera for that. I'm not very good or experienced when it comes to black and white, but sometimes it is interesting to look for new challenges. --ArildV 20:26, 2 January 2014 (UTC) Comment I'm not familiar with northern light but on the histogram the image is still underexposed --Moroder 19:28, 3 January 2014 (UTC) Done--ArildV 13:10, 7 January 2014 (UTC)}
OK --Moroder 04:42, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mercedes-Benz Museum in Stuttgart. --Julian Herzog 10:50, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
- Decline The bulding at left seem to lean in --Christian Ferrer 23:59, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
Not done Mattbuck 19:40, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Consensual review[edit]
File:Thyssen_Krupp_Quartier_Luftaufnahme_Nordost_2014.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Aerial photo of ThyssenKrupp headquarters from north-east --Tuxyso 09:24, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
- Withdrawn
Opposetoo noisy, even for a aerial view where you have to shift the ISO up --Taxiarchos228 20:33, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
Sorry, I disagree. IMHO the level of detail is much more important than massive NR with aerial shots. Even the tiny blue ThyssenKrupp sign is readable. Look at the details on the parking lot. --Tuxyso 20:36, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
you may disagree but a QI has to pass several technical criteria, good details and a catastrophic bad noise can't be a QI. And I know that aerial views can be made much more better like in this case. --Taxiarchos228 20:43, 5 January 2014 (UTC)- Oppose The noise is too strong for a QI. Sorry. --Dirtsc 20:19, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
- Done. Dirtsc and Taxiarchos228. Please take another look. Thanks, --Tuxyso 22:36, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
- the noise was reduced distinctive, so I strike my contra, but for QI IMO not really enough, I vote neutral --Taxiarchos228 09:26, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
- It's surely up to you, but I do not see a reason why this should not be QI. --Tuxyso 11:01, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
- I already argued: you have turned a really worse picture into a reasonably ordinary picture, but for me far away from good. And QI has to be a good image. I have made 2012 hundreds of aerial pictures. ISO 1600 is to high, even for a Nikon D7000, as I use by the way too. --Taxiarchos228 20:12, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
- Your opinion, but we are not talking about good pictures (in that case 80% percent of QICs had to be denied) but about a check if some quality criteria are met. Your argument seems to be rather mechanically: D7000 at ISO1600 equals bad picture. You can surely make QIs at IS3200 with the D7000. Let's wait for further opinions. --Tuxyso (talk) 06:16, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
- I never rise my opinion to a general. But I guess as own of the same camera like yours and a person with practice in aerial shots I have a solid opinion. The QI criteria is clear and the strong noise at this picture you can't deny. I as you can see I am not alone with my opinion. I never said ISO 1600 can`t never get QI, but in this case ISO 1600 was needless and voidable and has for the result a bad influence. --Taxiarchos228 20:45, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
- Your opinion, but we are not talking about good pictures (in that case 80% percent of QICs had to be denied) but about a check if some quality criteria are met. Your argument seems to be rather mechanically: D7000 at ISO1600 equals bad picture. You can surely make QIs at IS3200 with the D7000. Let's wait for further opinions. --Tuxyso (talk) 06:16, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
- I already argued: you have turned a really worse picture into a reasonably ordinary picture, but for me far away from good. And QI has to be a good image. I have made 2012 hundreds of aerial pictures. ISO 1600 is to high, even for a Nikon D7000, as I use by the way too. --Taxiarchos228 20:12, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
- It's surely up to you, but I do not see a reason why this should not be QI. --Tuxyso 11:01, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Apart from discussions about what could and should be done with D7000s, I think we can all agree that the denoised version really is not doing the image any good at all. Making the roads and the grass look like something that resembles a painting, certainly is not adding quality when looking at the situation with common sense - if it fitting the requirement of "low noise" for QI, so be it, but the expense of detail is immense. (IMO, the original image is of more use for most people out there.) However, it does probably mean that we will not really get a QI out of it in any version. --DXR 23:46, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
- For this moment I take it back and revert to the previous version. IMHO DXR is right regarding the details and usefullless for other people. If I have more time I will rework on this image. Probably downscaling without dedicated NR preserves most of the details and meets QI criteria. I guess a 2 MP version will have less noise and lot of details. BTW: For me level of deails (and noise) is sufficient for QI. Look of all that downscaled and noisy sport shots. --Tuxyso (talk) 09:08, 9 January 2014 (UTC)