Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 30 2014

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

==[edit]

  • Nomination Kargopol toys, Arkhangelsk Oblast, Russia (photo by Freetrack Expedition 2013) --A.Savin 14:25, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality --Halavar 15:27, 21 January 2014 (UTC)Temporary
  •  Oppose Is the author a User of "Commons"? Seems to be a "consortium" of photographers, in this case we have a problem with the copyright...--Jebulon 17:45, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
  •  Comment So, we still have this CR and it is short before being archived as unassessed. I think Jebulon should finally either provide a rationale why this image is not a quality (sic!) image, or withdraw his oppose. User:Freetrack Expedition 2013 is a registered Commons account. OK, it is no longer active, but I don't know any QIC guideline which says that a QI has to be created by an active wikimedian. There is a valid CC-BY license, the image is obviously not stolen from an external website nor from a print source; so we on Commons have to accept this image in good faith, regardless of the circumstances of how it was taken and uploaded. Thanks --A.Savin 11:21, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
    • Yes you are right. I withdraw my oppose. It was only a question about the process, and not about the quality. My oppose was only to solve this question, or to obtain other opinions. So let the discussion continue somewhere else (it does, in the french "Village pump"). Thanks.--Jebulon 11:46, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --Cayambe 10:59, 26 January 2014 (UTC)