Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 01 2021

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:AUT_vs._TUR_2016-03-29_(359).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Caner Erkin, footballplaer of Turkey. --Steindy 19:08, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --MB-one 19:21, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree on this one, because of the crops; both hands are cut off and also the feet.--Peulle 22:52, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose pretty obvious! as above. Charlesjsharp 09:34, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I agree. Rodhullandemu 09:40, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose 3 distracting crops are too many, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 17:56, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Steindy 19:09, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Dülmen,_Rorup,_NSG_Roruper_Holz_--_2021_--_8169.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination: Nature reserve “Roruper Holz” (COE-045) in the Hanrorup hamlet near Rorup, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:03, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
  • Review
     Oppose Sorry, but there aren’t almost any (distinct) sharp flowers. --Nefronus 03:34, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
    I think we should discuss this. IMO enough plants are sharp enough. --XRay 04:27, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  SupportA difficult motif, where you can probably find as many supporters as opponents for every conceivable photographic implementation. Depth of field too large, depth of field too small, background too turbulent, background too blurred, too many blossoms in focus, too few blossoms in focus, better to take a wide angle, better to take a longer focal length, etc., etc. I find the realization quite well done. Nice lighting, colours look natural, sharp parts sharp enough regarding the resolution. --Smial 12:13, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Almost all of the photo is out of focus--Lmbuga 03:18, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 19:43, 30 June 2021 (UTC)