Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 26 2016

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Lindenallee in der Blüte.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Tilia avenues avenue, Natural monument in Hesse --Verum 19:51, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment it´s tilted ccw. --Hubertl 21:29, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
    •  Comment Thanks for review. New version. --Verum 22:00, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Hubertl 02:36, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose lots of spots and dirt in the sky, not really sharp (crisp) --Carschten 12:54, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose as above --Dirtsc 13:09, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment New version, see history. Gruss --Nightflyer 21:22, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
    •  Comment You have not only removed dust spots but also changed contrast settings and white balance. This affects also noise. The unsharpness seems to be (partly) a result of Sony's noise reduction techniques or noise reduction by adobe(tm). I'd suggest a clean new development from RAW (if available) with less noise reduction. As I recently have seen this blurring noise reduction often coming from Sony SLT: Sony photographers: please lower the settings of noise reduction, if possible, photograph RAW, if possible. --Smial 11:40, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I'm looking at the latest version and the trees are all unsharp. --Peulle 16:43, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 19:18, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Ανεμόμυλοι, Χώρα Σερίφου 9735.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Windmills in Chora of Serifos. --C messier 14:19, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Comment A little bit on the bright side, especially the light blue door is missing it's details. Very fixable. W.carter 14:14, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
    •  Comment I disagree, nothing was clipped and then remapped (please check histogram). --C messier 12:45, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
      •  Comment Well, technically and according to histograms there is nothing wrong with the pic, but a pic is also what is esthetically pleasing to the eye, and in this case I think some more details would be better. W.carter 18:27, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
        •  Comment The light from this angle is a bit flat, and this why there aren't so many details. --C messier 13:35, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
          •  Comment I think it's better to get some more input on this since we see things so differently. W.carter 19:38, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support o.k. for me --Ermell 07:30, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support A bit soft -- Smial 14:48, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 19:19, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Ανεμόμυλος, Χώρα Σερίφου 9658.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Windmill in Serifos. --C messier 10:46, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Comment The windows and the small bush to the left of the building are a bit too dark to see any details. It is also very hard to see the difference between the wall and the house. Do you think you could do something about this? W.carter 19:45, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
    •  Comment I disagree, there is visible detail in the shadows (and histogram confirms that the nunmber of very dark pixels is negligible).--C messier 13:36, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
    •  Comment Again, technically and according to histograms there is nothing wrong with the pic, but a pic is also what is esthetically pleasing to the eye, and in this case I think some more details would be better. Do you want to take these to QIC or just wait for another reviewer since we disagree? W.carter 18:31, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
      •  Comment A photo with less contrast wan't be more aesthetically pleasing. --C messier 13:32, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
        •  Comment I think it's better to get some more input on this since we see things so differently. W.carter 19:39, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Looks a bit as if you got the maximum from a kit lens, but the picture is QI for me.--Ermell 07:39, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support A bit soft -- Smial 14:48, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 19:19, 25 July 2016 (UTC)