Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives March 08 2017

• 
  • Nomination Another view of the inside of the Galleria Vittorio Emanuele II, Milan, on a busy summer day --Daniel Case 03:08, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:15, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Shophouses. Kerbau Road. Little India, Central Region, Singapore. --Halavar 00:30, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:16, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination School assembly room, Hedemora, Sweden. --Vivo 00:03, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:18, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Frederic Chopin Theatre in Duszniki-Zdrój --Jacek Halicki 00:00, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:12, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Guesthouse "Słoneczna" in Duszniki-Zdrój 1 --Jacek Halicki 00:00, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:12, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Embassy Court in Brighton, England. Built 1935. Architect Wells Coates. --ArildV 23:34, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice picture. -- Ikan Kekek 01:59, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Palads Cinema in Copenhagen, Denmark. --Bob Collowân 21:24, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:58, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sunbeam-Talbot 2 litre Sports Tourer used in the 2001 WWII film Enigma --DeFacto 21:09, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. A nice car. --Peulle 23:14, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ponte Lungo bridge on Fondamenta Zattere. View from de Giudecca canal in Venice. --Moroder 19:49, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Comment White blank space in the right bottom part (see the note). --Halavar 20:09, 5 March 2017 (UTC) Done Thanks for the hint --Moroder 22:39, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
     Support Good now. QI for me --Halavar 23:31, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sunflower field under the Milky Way. It's noisy, but acceptable for ISO 5000 on a hot summer's night, IMO. Juliancolton 19:10, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion The noise looks quite normal for a Milky Way photo AFAIK, but there are some "dead"/burned out/whatever pixels among the sun flowers. Think you could get rid of/clone out those? --W.carter 19:19, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
    How does that look? Juliancolton 20:14, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
    Much better, they were a bit annoying. Good quality. --W.carter 20:35, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View of Thrapsano, Crete. --C messier 13:53, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Bob Collowân 21:21, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination San Salvatore bastion, Chania, Crete. --C messier 13:53, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Peulle 18:54, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Slush on window - day. --W.carter 18:29, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:22, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Slush on window - dusk. --W.carter 18:29, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Peulle 20:15, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Slush on window - night. --W.carter 18:29, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:22, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The flower of a Peace Lily (Spathiphyllum wallisii). --W.carter 18:29, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Simple, detailed and beautiful --Daniel Case 03:02, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The flower of a Peace Lily (Spathiphyllum wallisii). --W.carter 18:29, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Even better than the other one --Daniel Case 03:02, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Artwork and sign at the entrance of Gamarra Park. Vitoria-Gasteiz, Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 18:08, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion A little bit close crop on the text, but since it is in line with the sculpture I think it's ok. Good quality. --W.carter 18:33, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
     Comment Yes, you're right. I had to rotate the image and there wasn't more space left. --Basotxerri 19:20, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
    Ah, that explains it. Well, it's a nice pic anyway. --W.carter 20:37, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Artwork and sign at the entrance of Gamarra Park; bike rack. Vitoria-Gasteiz, Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 18:08, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:26, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ceiling in Palazzo Barberini --Livioandronico2013 17:46, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion GQ --Palauenc05 17:50, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mystical Marriage of Saint Catherine (Denys Calvaert) --Livioandronico2013 17:45, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion GQ --Palauenc05 17:50, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination St Gregory the Great by José de Ribera --Livioandronico2013 17:45, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion GQ --Palauenc05 17:50, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Apollo's Chariot in Palazzo Barberini by Giuseppe Bartolomeo Chiari --Livioandronico2013 17:45, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion GQ --Palauenc05 17:50, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bagger conveyor line for transport of water diluted mud for dredging depot.
    --Famberhorst 16:59, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:41, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Antique cannon. Location: Church of San Rocco surrounded in the military cemetery in Peio Paese.
    --Famberhorst 16:59, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:41, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Palazzo Unicredit on Fondamenta Zattere al Ponte Lungo . View from de Giudecca canal in Venice. --Moroder 16:38, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:26, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A Meerkat, Suricata suricatta in the Zoo Karlsruhe --Llez 15:58, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 17:52, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Walking Iris (Iridoideae Neomarica) at Jawaharlal Nehru Tropical Botanical Research Institute, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India. --Shishir 16:10, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Accettable --Livioandronico2013 17:52, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Decorated facade of the shophouse. Dunlop Street. Little India, Central Region, Singapore. --Halavar 15:24, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:00, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Shophouses. Dunlop Street. Little India, Central Region, Singapore. --Halavar 15:24, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:26, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Shophouses. Serangoon Road. Little India, Central Region, Singapore. --Halavar 15:24, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 17:52, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sri Veeramakaliamman Temple. Little India, Central Region, Singapore. --Halavar 15:24, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 17:52, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Building, 672 Kerbau Road. Little India, Central Region, Singapore. --Halavar 15:24, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 21:49, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Palace pier Brighton. --ArildV 14:53, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Looks OK. --Peulle 15:19, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Paralimni: view towards Cape Greco --A.Savin 14:43, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Halavar 15:25, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Paralimni: remote view of Cape Greco from Agia Napa --A.Savin 14:43, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Slight noise, but difficult conditions, good enough for QI. --Peulle 15:13, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kyrenia: gate of the castle --A.Savin 14:43, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Llez 16:01, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kyrenia: view of the castle from the Old Harbour --A.Savin 14:43, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Llez 16:01, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A Norwegian grey wooden house.--Peulle 13:54, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Not exclusively because of the missing location category, but first of all because of too soft facade and overexposed whites. --A.Savin 14:39, 5 March 2017 (UTC) Comment Thanks for your review. As a side note, in this image the correct category for the region (rather than the town) is used.--Peulle 15:08, 5 March 2017 (UTC)  Comment So, for example, for this photo, you sincerely think "Parks in Mari El" would have been sufficient and "Volzhsk" doesn't need to be added. (Mari El = region, Volzhsk = town.) Then it seems you really misunderstood something in COM:Categories... --A.Savin 15:17, 5 March 2017 (UTC) Comment Depends on the size of the region, IMO.--Peulle 15:20, 5 March 2017 (UTC)  Comment I'm curious where's your borderline. --A.Savin 16:16, 5 March 2017 (UTC)  Comment Must be determined on a case by case basis, I think. In New York, they have narrowed it down to individual street names, but that's a huge city where "Houses in New York" would not be specific enough. I can create the "Houses in Risør" cat if you want, but I personally think it would be more specific than is needed.--Peulle 16:51, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A Norwegian brown wooden house.--Peulle 13:54, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:58, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A Norwegian modular home.--Peulle 13:54, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Halavar 15:24, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Former Fire station in Leppelsdorf --Ermell 13:12, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:41, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rectory in Lauter --Ermell 13:12, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:41, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Town hall in Lauter --Ermell 13:12, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:41, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Crucifix in Lauter --Ermell 13:12, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:41, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Es Ampiang Dadiah, a beverage desert made with rice meal and buffalo yoghurt, Ateh Market, Bukittinggi Crisco 1492 10:29, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion I find the picture quality good enough, though I think that's debatable. This doesn't look like a beverage, which would be something people drink; instead, it looks a whole lot like sago gula Melaka. I never knew anyone milked water buffaloes in the Malay Archipelago. In Malaysia, they use sweetened condensed milk when they make Malay-style sweets with milk. That's pretty interesting that they use susu kerbau - that's what they said they use? -- Ikan Kekek 10:53, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
    Yoghurt, actually. My bad. Crisco 1492 11:18, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Padang City as seen from Gunung Padang Crisco 1492 10:29, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 10:55, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Island on the horizon, Indian Ocean near Padang Crisco 1492 10:29, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very empty photo, but good quality. You could add value if you can find out what the island's name is and add that to the file description. -- Ikan Kekek 11:01, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
    
    The empty composition was deliberate. Island name added. Crisco 1492 11:24, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A fishing village south of Padang Crisco 1492 10:29, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. I may be biased, because this brings back a lot of good feelings from my childhood in Malaysia, when loads of Malay villages looked like this, but I think others would agree that the quality is adequate. -- Ikan Kekek 10:59, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Malin Kundang Stone, Air Manis Beach, Padang Crisco 1492 10:29, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 10:59, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Zurbano, near Vitoria-Gasteiz. Álava, Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 10:22, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Quality high enough for Q1. Large sky adds something to the photo --Michielverbeek 10:56, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Birling Gap. --ArildV 10:13, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 13:09, 5 March 2017 (UTC) Comment I agree on the image quality, but could we perhaps get a more accurate description?--Peulle 13:11, 5 March 2017 (UTC)  Done Thank you Ermell and Peulle. --ArildV 14:45, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Antonov An-178 UR-EXP 313 at ILA Berlin 2016. --Julian Herzog 09:54, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 13:09, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Afterburner of a Eurojet EJ200 turbofan engine for Eurofighter Typhoon aircraft at ILA Berlin 2016. --Julian Herzog 09:54, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Would have been even nicer if you'd left an entire circle. Good quality. --Basotxerri 10:00, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 84+35 German Army Sikorsky CH-53G Super Stallion at ILA Berlin 2016. --Julian Herzog 09:54, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Excellent shot. --Crisco 1492 10:31, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 84+35 German Army Sikorsky CH-53G Super Stallion at ILA Berlin 2016. --Julian Herzog 09:54, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Basotxerri 09:57, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Giudecca Canal and the Zattere in Venice. --Moroder 09:51, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Basotxerri 10:01, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dolmen "Sorgiñetxe" ("witch's house") near Arrizala. Álava, Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 09:50, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Crisco 1492 10:31, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Summit of Peña Roja in the Entzia mountain range. Álava, Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 09:50, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. I love the contrast of the shadows and light on the cliff face. --Crisco 1492 10:31, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Giudecca Canal and the Zattere in Venice. --Moroder 09:38, 5 March 2017 (UTC) I withdraw my nomination Duplicate nomination--Moroder 09:50, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn
• 
  • Nomination Gibraltar, Main Street, British war memorial --Berthold Werner 09:29, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
    Please fix dust spots near upper left corner. After you fix those, I'll consider this good enough to promote. -- Ikan Kekek 11:04, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
     Done Please check again. --Berthold Werner 16:41, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
    Thanks for taking care of that. -- Ikan Kekek 02:18, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion {{{2}}}
• 
  • Nomination Harald Sandberg: Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary of Sweden to India --Satdeep Gill 09:18, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline Insufficient quality: not sharp, sorry. --Peulle 13:12, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Harald Sandberg: Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary of Sweden to India --Satdeep Gill 09:18, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline Not sharp enough, sorry. --Basotxerri 09:52, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Svetitskhoveli Monastery, Mtskheta, Georgia --Poco a poco 09:10, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion I'm not sure about the WB, perhaps you could check it. It look a bit yellowish to me. Good quality anyway. --Basotxerri 09:55, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mtatsminda Pantheon, Tbilisi, Georgia --Poco a poco 09:10, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 13:16, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Narikala, Tbilisi, Georgia --Poco a poco 09:10, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --A.Savin 14:27, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Belle Tout lighthouse. --ArildV 08:34, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very good. -- Ikan Kekek 09:01, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mook-NL, church --Michielverbeek 07:53, 5 March 2017 (UTC) Comment IMO the stairs should be cropped out. That would solve the perspective problems on the left as well.--Ermell 08:14, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
    It was not a good idea to nominate this photo. I prefer not to crop the stairs; I make a new one when I visit this village again. --Michielverbeek 20:14, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn {{{2}}}
• 
  • Nomination Steyl (Tegelen)-NL, sculpture --Michielverbeek 07:53, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
    Buildings are leaning in Poco a poco 09:20, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn Small perspective change, but it's not a Q1 --Michielverbeek 21:20, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gennep-NL, churchtower --Michielverbeek 07:53, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:20, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Broekhuizen-NL, church --Michielverbeek 07:53, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --DXR 08:05, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View towards Birling Gap and Seven Sisters. --ArildV 07:36, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 08:03, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A south view of First Baptist Church, Huntsville, Alabama --DXR 07:29, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Steeple is a little soft at full size, but this is a large file, and it's quite good enough. -- Ikan Kekek 09:00, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A view of Big Spring International Park, Huntville, Alabama --DXR 07:29, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 08:07, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A southeast view of Westend Gate, Frankfurt am Main --DXR 07:29, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 08:05, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A southwest view of the Bockenheimer Warte, Frankfurt am Main --DXR 07:29, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 07:38, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A west view of Westendstraße 1, also known as Westend Tower, Frankfurt am Main --DXR 07:29, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 08:17, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hike from parking in central Malga Mare (1983m) to Lago del Careser (2603m) in the Parco nazionale dello Stelvio (Italy).
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 06:01, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 07:40, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mountain hiking of parking in power station Malga Mare to Lago Lungo (2553m).
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 06:01, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:10, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Travellers interacting with Wedding Cake Rock in the Royal National Park. PhilipTerryGraham 05:36, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Insufficient quality. Sorry. Sharpness should be better. Tilted. A smartphone isn't a good choice for a QIC. --XRay 10:59, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View of the White Cliffs from Wedding Cake Rock, in the Royal National Park. PhilipTerryGraham 05:36, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline Insufficient quality. Not very sharp, sorry --Moroder 08:24, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View across Botany Bay from Kamay Botany Bay National Park PhilipTerryGraham 05:32, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 08:08, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Memorial on top of Mount Ulrich, Klagenfurt, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:32, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --DXR 07:32, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Plaque with homecomer`s legacy at the base of the cross on top of Mount Ulrich, Klagenfurt, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:32, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:56, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Homecomer memorial cross on top of Mount Ulrich, Klagenfurt, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:32, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 08:04, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bronze plaque with the engraved Mount Ulrich-legend, set up at the church wall on top of Mount Ulrich, Klagenfurt, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:32, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:26, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination NOREIA consecration stone over the portal of the church-hulk on top of Mount Ulrich, Klagenfurt, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:32, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. Promotion in advance. Stone looks reversed. ;-) May be right. DoF could be better, but acceptable. Description must be fixed, syntax errors. --XRay 10:41, 5 March 2017 (UTC)  Done Description fixed. Reversed stone on purpose by the builders. -- Johann Jaritz 11:28, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A red 2017 Chevrolet Bolt EV parked on the street in Mountain View, California. (Front view.) --Grendelkhan 01:58, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Insufficient quality. Sorry. Perspective problems, sharpness, crop should be better. Looks like a snapshot. --XRay 10:39, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A red 2017 Chevrolet Bolt EV parked on the street in Mountain View, California. (Rear view.) --Grendelkhan 01:58, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Insufficient quality. Sorry. Perspective problems, sharpness, crop should be better. Looks like a snapshot. --XRay 10:39, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bear Cave in Kletno 3 --Jacek Halicki 00:00, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:58, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bear Cave in Kletno 5 --Jacek Halicki 00:00, 5 March 2017 (UTC) Comment This needs a better file description for sure, btw ist looks pretty noisy --Moroder 09:19, 5 March 2017 (UTC)  Done --Jacek Halicki 13:39, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 16:05, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ambulyx staudingeri - Dorsal side - Male. By User:Archaeodontosaurus --Olivier LPB 23:28, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. I would feel better if the banding or whatever it is from the light were reduced, but overall this is still a QI for me. --Crisco 1492 10:38, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ambulyx staudingeri - Ventral side - Male. By User:Archaeodontosaurus --Olivier LPB 23:28, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. I would feel better if the banding or whatever it is from the light were reduced, but overall this is still a QI for me. --Crisco 1492 10:38, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View of Archanes, Crete. --C messier 22:19, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --DXR 07:34, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Street in Thrapsano, Crete. --C messier 22:19, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 09:22, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Meskinovrysi fountain, Rethymno, Crete. --C messier 22:19, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --A.Savin 14:24, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Byzantine city walls of Chania --C messier 18:24, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Just avoids being overexposed --Daniel Case 02:54, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dräckes Mina Aronssons gård, Hedemora, Sweden --Vivo 21:31, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --DXR 07:34, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Some of the buildings of the CityPlace neighbourhood in Downtown Toronto, Canada as seen from the railway bridge on Blue Jays Way, Rogers Centre. --Slaunger 21:59, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Not sharp enough for Q1 for me, it might be repairable --Michielverbeek 07:35, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
    @Michielverbeek: : I think sharpness is almost as good as it gets with my gear (5 y old entry level DSLR with kit lens), but I have improved perspective, repaired some issue with moiré and selectively tweaked sharpness/NR. -- Slaunger 14:08, 4 March 2017 (UTC) Difference is small, but large enough for a weak support --Michielverbeek 08:25, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination National Museum of Romanian History, Bucharest, Romania --Poco a poco 19:43, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline Insufficient quality. Dome is very unsharp/OOF. --Slaunger 22:03, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
     New version Poco a poco 18:30, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
    It is better, but I still find the dome is too unsharp for QI - also in a smaller review size, sorry. -- Slaunger 19:20, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ambulyx semifervens - Dorsal side - Male. By User:Archaeodontosaurus --Olivier LPB 17:55, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good detail given the specimen's size --Daniel Case 02:49, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sibiu (Hermannstadt, Nagyszeben) - Holy Trinity Metropolitan Cathedral --Pudelek 16:54, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline That one overexposed (perhaps due to an unfortunate angle) picture in the middle spoils it --Daniel Case 02:49, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination “Old Aloysianum” in Gelsenkirchen --Carschten 09:36, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline Could have used more DoF; color on bricks is weird given light --Daniel Case 01:22, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Jetty in a beach on route 11, Miramar, Argentina --Ezarate 00:14, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Dust spots --A.Savin 14:08, 2 March 2017 (UTC)  Done Ezarate 18:06, 2 March 2017 (UTC) Wrong. Not done. Even in preview visible, let alone at 100%. --A.Savin 10:44, 3 March 2017 (UTC) Comment I've tried to remove the dust spots. Adamdaley 01:28, 5 March 2017 (UTC) OK now. --A.Savin 14:21, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination American flamingo (Phoenicopterus ruber). Jurong Bird Park. Jurong, West Region, Singapore. --Halavar 10:37, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion IMO the left bird is too unsharp (look at its head), so the only way to rescue this, seems to me to make a crop without it (see note). --Basotxerri 19:04, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
     Done Thanks for the hint. New version uploaded. Please take a look again. --Halavar 15:20, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
    OK for me. --Basotxerri 17:49, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Anatinae. Jurong Bird Park. Jurong, West Region, Singapore. --Halavar 10:54, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline  Comment Needs correct species in category.--Peulle 15:13, 26 February 2017 (UTC) Not done in a week.--Peulle 13:18, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Consensual review

File:Zattere_e_Gesuati_vista_dal_Canale_Giudecca.jpg

• Nomination The Giudecca Canal and the Zattere in Venice. --Moroder 09:15, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• Withdrawn
•  Oppose The tower and the bridge at the left are blurred. Sorry --A.Savin 14:37, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  Imo irrelevant compared to the size of the picture --Moroder 16:32, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

 Question You sincerely think that with a 36MP camera, one doesn't need to care about correct focus? --A.Savin 16:44, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

 Question What is wrong with this focus at a distance of 100 m and f/7 ?--Moroder 17:15, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

• Mild  Oppose - The tower is evidently out of focus even at the size which can fit in full on my laptop, which isn't that huge. -- Ikan Kekek 02:21, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose I see it too, the tower on the left is too unsharp.--Peulle 09:18, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

 I withdraw my nomination --Moroder 18:52, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   Peulle 09:18, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

File:Jardín_del_Príncipe,_Mahan,_Irán,_2016-09-22,_DD_28.jpg

• Nomination Shazdeh Garden, Mahan, Iran --Poco a poco 19:35, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. --A.Savin 10:47, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Much too distorted. That's no good image for me. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 14:18, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

• Are you going to behave like this for a while, just curious? Poco a poco 20:45, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

•  Question - I won't oppose promotion because of an obviously intentional distortion, but it is pretty drastic, and I'd be curious to hear from you on what you mean to bring out by having each side lean greatly to the same side on the bottom. -- Ikan Kekek 10:11, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment There is no other way to provide a centered view of the building with good detail than standing in front of it, as behing it there is a very long water change that doesn't allow you to be centered. My intention was to provide a centered detail view of the key building in this UNESCO garden, and there was no other way to do it Poco a poco 11:53, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

•  Question - What would happen if you applied perspective correction to the photo? -- Ikan Kekek 13:37, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

• Are we talking some correction or are you asking for it to look completely straight? The latter would ruin the image, IMO.--Peulle 19:46, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

• I was talking some correction. But how would making it completely straight ruin the photo? -- Ikan Kekek 00:24, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment There is simply no space left for a perspective correction. Besides, such extreme stretching is bad for the quality. --A.Savin 02:39, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment That's what I meant, yes.--Peulle 13:20, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

•  Support Seeing how the park looks, it's impossible to get a center shot at the whole building unless you stand in one of the pools (probably not allowed). Not even with a telephoto lens since you got the trees blocking the view then. I think this is a creative solution to a tricky problem. --W.carter 19:58, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality--Ermell 20:01, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 20:59, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

File:Combe_Laval59.jpg

• Nomination Route Combe Laval, France --Zoppo59 11:09, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. --A.Savin 14:16, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
• Pic is good enough but the description is way too light, a QI needs to be more described. --Selbymay 08:51, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment - I think the description, which just gives the name of the route, is sufficient, provided that geolocation is added. -- Ikan Kekek 10:14, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Great view but it lacks detail IMHO Poco a poco 11:55, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
•  DoneI added coords and tried to get more sharpness, hope that works...--Zoppo59 (talk) 19:11, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support OK for me. --Basotxerri 21:16, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Somewhat noisy, but a stunning composition. --Palauenc05 22:59, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support - Not that noisy to this viewer. -- Ikan Kekek 00:22, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   Peulle 09:06, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

File:Volvo EC140BLC digger.jpg

• Nomination Volvo EC140BLC digger in Risør, Norway.--Peulle 23:56, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
• Promotion
• Location category missing --A.Savin 14:06, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

•  Done--Peulle 14:34, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment I'm sorry sir, but I'd like it more precise --A.Savin 10:42, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment I don't understand. No more precise category exists; if I create a "EC140BLC in Norway" category, this will be the only image in it. Is that what you want?--Peulle 12:12, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment Some common sense is what I permanently miss here. What about Risør, or when there is no such category the district (or Transport in xxx district etc.) or similar level, I don't know what you have in Norway, surely you should know better and not me. --A.Savin 13:01, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment I understand now. :) I do know better, which is why in my opinion I have already made the best choice available; Risør is a very small town in Norway, certainly not worthy of a separate excavator category. Unless categories should be created for every single town in every country, which I think you'll agree would be ridiculous. As for creating the specific "EC140BLC by country" cats, that could be a possibilty but right now there are only 4 images of the EC140BLC on Commons, so I'm not sure it warrants sorting into further categories. Should we create them?--Peulle 13:31, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment Because it is a small town, a photo taken there should not be added to its category? --A.Savin 14:51, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

• You're after some permanent solution of common sense; adding a town name category to every single image on Commons is not sensible, IMO. Only when categories grow with lots of images does that kind of sorting become necessary. A category with 4 images does not need these 4 images split up into 4 different subcategories.--Peulle 15:15, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment Wrong. I didn't want you to create whatever subcategories, all I demanded was to use location category. EOD for me here, it's really useless. --A.Savin 15:20, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

This isn't going anywhere; as I consider the categories sufficient with country category, I'll move this to CR.--Peulle 15:27, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment Instead of simply adding a category, now moving to CR. Wow. --A.Savin 15:39, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment Don't give me that passive aggressive attitude; you are saying that there should be a category for each town on each excavator (instead of country, which I have used). I disagree since that would negate the whole point of sorting into categories (a category should contain several images and if each category has only a single image, there is no point in using them at all). The point is that we cannot agree. Therefore moving to CR for further opinions is the correct approach. My  Question to the group is: are the current categories sufficient?--Peulle 14:32, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

• This is a lie. I didn't say "for each excavator". Fot the town only: yes, but I suppose Risør has one. --A.Savin 16:33, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

• There is a Risør category (used for buildings and landscape), but since you said: "Transport in xxx district etc." I thought you meant for me to create the category "excavators in Risør" (or worse: "Volvo EC140BLC in Risør"). As I said above, I think such categorization would be too much. As for the Risør transport category, it is used for roads and ships, not construction machines. --Peulle 16:48, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

• This category not only "for buildings and landscape", but for any photo taken in R. or related to R. So, if I write "Location category should be added", I mean this category, unless there is a more specified one. It's a shame I've to waste my time to explain self-evident things. --A.Savin 02:34, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

•  Support Enough said. I've added the missing category for you. Next time you please nominate with sufficient categorization, otherwise I'll reserve me the right to decline straightaway. Thanks --A.Savin 13:24, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Question So you believe this image, which in itself has little to do with the town of Abingdon, should have an Abingdon category? I think such a strategy would clutter the categories on Commons.--Peulle 13:40, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment If I were the photographer, I would have added it too. For all photos where the location is theoretically identifiable like in the excavator photo, it is mandatory. Besides, the name of the town is written in the file description. So, if you think the photo has nothing to do with R., I wonder why did you write R. in the file description. --A.Savin 14:06, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --A.Savin 14:11, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

File:Akan MHNT.ETH.2010.25.251.jpg

• Nomination Akan Gold Weight, Geometric weight, indented-patterned --Ercé 07:29, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Oppose Exactly the same problem as another similar picture pending on CR. Too much of plain white, and the weight is oversharpened. --A.Savin 16:19, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Question A.Savin, what are the indications (or effects) of oversharpening in this picture? Overly bright details that aren't so clear at full size? -- Ikan Kekek 11:19, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment The indication is that there is lack of detail on the object's surface, whereas noise and artefacts are very clearly visible. My IMHO. --A.Savin 15:22, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

• Thanks for explaining. -- Ikan Kekek 13:25, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

•  Support Perhaps it is not excellent but good for QI. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 14:24, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose I agree with A.Savin here; looking at the shadow by the base, it seems like the image has been oversharpened. I would expect more from a studio shot like this, and similar images in this series are of higher quality so it's clearly possible.--Peulle 14:37, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 09:07, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

File:Molino_de_agua_de_Koushk-e-no,_Yazd,_Irán,_2016-09-21,_DD_23-25_HDR.jpg

• Nomination Water channel in the water mill of Koushk-e-no, Yazd, Iran --Poco a poco 19:35, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Oppose Insufficient DOF, I'm afraid. Most of the channel is quite unsharp. --C messier 11:16, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

• Tough review, may I hear some other voices? --Poco a poco 21:28, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

•  Oppose Not that tough, the main subject is the water and it's unsharp. Sorry. --Selbymay 08:44, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
• Weak  Support. Somewhat low DOF, but if the water is moving, it can not be pinsharp. 2 seconds exposure time, so blur is ok. --Smial 10:36, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

 Comment Of course the long exposure makes the water appeared to be blurred, but the close banks are blurred.--Selbymay 11:00, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

•  Oppose It's a close call; the bricks close to the camera are sharp and I don't care about the water, but I'd really wish the walls further away from the camera were sharper. You don't happen to have an image available with different aperture setting?--Peulle 13:37, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment No, I've only this image. The spot was not goog illuminated, therefore if you want it sharpe it should be a long exposure. IMHO the unsharpness at the bottom is not dramatic. Poco a poco 08:53, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, but the water + lower banks are indeed without any detail. --A.Savin 13:18, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 13:46, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

File:Nicosia 01-2017 img10 Archbishops Palace.jpg

• Nomination Nicosia: Archbishop's Palace --A.Savin 16:02, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Oppose The perspective has not been successful; the left top corner is stretching too far upwards.--Peulle 16:59, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment @Peulle: Let me disagree. If you scroll thru the left wall, you will see it's perfectly vertical. --A.Savin 17:14, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment Yes, but the horizontal lines are so far from the horizon that the whole building looks stretched.--Peulle 22:19, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment I'd like to have third opinion. --A.Savin 13:57, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

 Support Good enough for QI. Perspective correction is not that disturbing. --Selbymay 09:01, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

•  Support I don´t see another solution. QI for me.--Ermell 20:11, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 21:01, 7 March 2017 (UTC)