Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 10 2023

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Holmenkollen_stasjon_Oslo.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Holmenkollen railway station. --Kallerna 15:26, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Chainwit. 16:55, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment Good image. I suggest adding a catergory for the train type. --Augustgeyler 16:58, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 18:48, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose As stated above this image needs a description and categorization about the train. --Augustgeyler 22:31, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
    •  Comment Added. --Kallerna 09:00, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
      •  Support  Thank you. Good description now. --Augustgeyler 15:41, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 03:43, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --BigDom 06:22, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

File:BKM-33030_Vitovt_Max_II_SPB_(img1).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination BKM-33030 Vitovt Max II at Leninsky Prospekt in Saint Petersburg --Florstein 12:24, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose The bus seems very distorted. -- Spurzem 12:34, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment @Spurzem: Nope. It is just design of the front "mask". --Florstein 15:04, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment So let's ask for the other opinions. --Florstein 06:01, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support The sky looks a little artificial, maybe a little too darkened? Otherwise ok. --Smial 14:56, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment The bus looks OK to me, but the sky does look weird per Smial. -- Ikan Kekek 17:19, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
@Ikan Kekek: I fixed the sky :-) --Florstein 19:49, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
@Florstein: I didn't think that the front wheels would have such a positive camber as the picture shows. I believed there was a perspective distortion in the photo. -- Spurzem 12:07, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
  • @Spurzem: Geometry distortion is normal for 24mm eqv. lens. It's not ultra-wide angle lens. --Alex Florstein (talk) 09:01, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment I think the photo looks better, now, overall, but the windows are much darker now. If that's how they looked, that's OK with me. Was it? -- Ikan Kekek 03:53, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
  • @Ikan Kekek: the windows in the passenger compartment are heavily tinted in any case. I see no problem in this. --Florstein 08:57, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
  • OK.  Support, and thanks for addressing this. -- Ikan Kekek 01:34, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --BigDom 15:34, 9 May 2023 (UTC)