Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 29 2021

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
  • * Nomination The main pod of the CN Tower, Toronto, Canada --Maksimsokolov 04:17, 27 May 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:21, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination The main pod of the CN Tower, Toronto, Canada --Maksimsokolov 04:17, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:21, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Neusträßer Bruch in Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:45, 27 May 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:02, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Neusträßer Bruch in Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:45, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:02, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Tree at Game reserve in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:45, 27 May 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:02, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Tree at Game reserve in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:45, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:02, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Paper aircraft (High-key lighting) --XRay 03:45, 27 May 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:01, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Paper aircraft (High-key lighting) --XRay 03:45, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:01, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Blades of grass with dewdrops in the Welte hamlet in Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:45, 27 May 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:01, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Blades of grass with dewdrops in the Welte hamlet in Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:45, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:01, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Rough-sawn cut surface of a cherry wood board --XRay 03:45, 27 May 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:01, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Rough-sawn cut surface of a cherry wood board --XRay 03:45, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:01, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Plaque in memory of the Republic of Brescia 1797. --Moroder 03:42, 27 May 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:48, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Plaque in memory of the Republic of Brescia 1797. --Moroder 03:42, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --XRay 03:48, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Dome painted by Antonio Mariani. --Moroder 03:42, 27 May 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:48, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Dome painted by Antonio Mariani. --Moroder 03:42, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --XRay 03:48, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Lateral portal, south facade, of the Cattedrale di Santo Stefano. --Moroder 03:42, 27 May 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:04, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Lateral portal, south facade, of the Cattedrale di Santo Stefano. --Moroder 03:42, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:04, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination View of Castello dell'Imperatore. --Moroder 03:42, 27 May 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:04, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination View of Castello dell'Imperatore. --Moroder 03:42, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:04, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Construction of the apartment dwellings "Bestseller" on Rainweg #12 in Pritschitz, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:06, 27 May 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:49, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Construction of the apartment dwellings "Bestseller" on Rainweg #12 in Pritschitz, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:06, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --XRay 03:49, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Villa Pauer on Gartenweg #31 in Sallach, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:06, 27 May 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:49, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Villa Pauer on Gartenweg #31 in Sallach, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:06, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --XRay 03:49, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Housing on Seeuferstraße #125 in Auen, Schiefling, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:06, 27 May 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:49, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Housing on Seeuferstraße #125 in Auen, Schiefling, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:06, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --XRay 03:49, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Apartment buildings HERMITAGE on Wörthersee-Süduferstraße #260a in Unterdellach, Maria Wörth, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:06, 27 May 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:50, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Apartment buildings HERMITAGE on Wörthersee-Süduferstraße #260a in Unterdellach, Maria Wörth, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:06, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --XRay 03:50, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Boathouse on Wörthersee-Süduferstraße #204 in Teixlbucht, Maria Wörth, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:06, 27 May 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:50, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Boathouse on Wörthersee-Süduferstraße #204 in Teixlbucht, Maria Wörth, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:06, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --XRay 03:50, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Apartment blocks by Peijaksentie, Havukoski, Vantaa --Ximonic 02:49, 27 May 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:50, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Apartment blocks by Peijaksentie, Havukoski, Vantaa --Ximonic 02:49, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --XRay 03:50, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Apartment buildings of Karjopolku, Havukoski, Vantaa --Ximonic 02:49, 27 May 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:18, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Apartment buildings of Karjopolku, Havukoski, Vantaa --Ximonic 02:49, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:18, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Ankkapuisto park in Korso, Vantaa --Ximonic 02:49, 27 May 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:06, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Ankkapuisto park in Korso, Vantaa --Ximonic 02:49, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:06, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination The Hôtel de Paris (also Hôtel-Restaurant Paris Palace) is a building located on the Avenue de la Liberté. --Mosbatho 21:08, 26 May 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support good quality --Palauenc05 21:12, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination The Hôtel de Paris (also Hôtel-Restaurant Paris Palace) is a building located on the Avenue de la Liberté. --Mosbatho 21:08, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support good quality --Palauenc05 21:12, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination View of Rome (by Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 17:42, 26 May 2021 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Imehling 19:39, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Citta del Vaticano train station (by Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 17:40, 26 May 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:08, 26 May 2021 (UTC) * Promotion {{{2}}}
    • Nomination Citta del Vaticano train station (by Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 17:40, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
       Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:08, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion {{{2}}}
  • * Nomination abandoned tractor Fiat --Christian Ferrer 16:21, 26 May 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:01, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination abandoned tractor Fiat --Christian Ferrer 16:21, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:01, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Red sauce pasta. --RockyMasum 13:10, 26 May 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:10, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Red sauce pasta. --RockyMasum 13:10, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:10, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Jakišnica, seaside village on the Island of Pag, Croatia. --Palauenc05 08:49, 26 May 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --RockyMasum 13:12, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Jakišnica, seaside village on the Island of Pag, Croatia. --Palauenc05 08:49, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --RockyMasum 13:12, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Paintings in the in the Manassei chapel. --Moroder 08:48, 26 May 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:06, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Paintings in the in the Manassei chapel. --Moroder 08:48, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:06, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Facade of Cattedrale di Santo Stefano cathedral and the pulpit of Donatello. --Moroder 08:48, 26 May 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. The dynamic perspective is a nice bit of variety and emphasizes the puplit. --Aristeas 09:16, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Facade of Cattedrale di Santo Stefano cathedral and the pulpit of Donatello. --Moroder 08:48, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. The dynamic perspective is a nice bit of variety and emphasizes the puplit. --Aristeas 09:16, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Graffiti in the industrial area of Bolzano --Ermell 07:25, 26 May 2021 (UTC) * Promotion Interesting graffiti, good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 08:28, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Graffiti in the industrial area of Bolzano --Ermell 07:25, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion Interesting graffiti, good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 08:28, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Catholic parish church in Schönfeld --Ermell 07:25, 26 May 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 08:14, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Catholic parish church in Schönfeld --Ermell 07:25, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 08:14, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Gravestone of Raymund Anton Gottfried Fuchshofer born 1717 died 1772 at the church in Wonsees --Ermell 07:25, 26 May 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 08:22, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Gravestone of Raymund Anton Gottfried Fuchshofer born 1717 died 1772 at the church in Wonsees --Ermell 07:25, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 08:22, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Pulpit of the evangelic branch church in Trumsdorf --Ermell 07:25, 26 May 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 12:13, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Pulpit of the evangelic branch church in Trumsdorf --Ermell 07:25, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 12:13, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Crucifix at the pilgrimage church of St. Clemens --Ermell 07:25, 26 May 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 08:23, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Crucifix at the pilgrimage church of St. Clemens --Ermell 07:25, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 08:23, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Rosa. Leaf abaxial side. --Knopik-som 07:04, 26 May 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 12:02, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Rosa. Leaf abaxial side. --Knopik-som 07:04, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 12:02, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Picea abies. --Knopik-som 07:04, 26 May 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 12:02, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Picea abies. --Knopik-som 07:04, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 12:02, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Twin houses, rue des Pyramides 12 & 14, Lille, France --Velvet 06:55, 26 May 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:18, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Twin houses, rue des Pyramides 12 & 14, Lille, France --Velvet 06:55, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:18, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Facade of Porta San Zeno in Verona, Italy --Lo Scaligero 06:10, 26 May 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 07:03, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Facade of Porta San Zeno in Verona, Italy --Lo Scaligero 06:10, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 07:03, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Facade of Porta Palio in Verona, Italy --Lo Scaligero 06:10, 26 May 2021 (UTC) * Promotion CA should be removed. --Ermell 07:25, 26 May 2021 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the review! --Lo Scaligero 12:57, 26 May 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:28, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Facade of Porta Palio in Verona, Italy --Lo Scaligero 06:10, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion
      CA should be removed. --Ermell 07:25, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
      ✓ Done Thanks for the review! --Lo Scaligero 12:57, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
       Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:28, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Detail of the facade of S. Fermo Maggiore in Verona, Italy --Lo Scaligero 06:10, 26 May 2021 (UTC) * Promotion The cranking in parts at the left and right should be cropped out. --Ermell 07:28, 26 May 2021 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the review! --Lo Scaligero 12:57, 26 May 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:29, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Detail of the facade of S. Fermo Maggiore in Verona, Italy --Lo Scaligero 06:10, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion
      The cranking in parts at the left and right should be cropped out. --Ermell 07:28, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
      ✓ Done Thanks for the review! --Lo Scaligero 12:57, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
       Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:29, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Lac de Vallon in commune of Bellevaux, Haute-Savoie, France. --Tournasol7 05:22, 26 May 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:05, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Lac de Vallon in commune of Bellevaux, Haute-Savoie, France. --Tournasol7 05:22, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:05, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Amanita muscaria near Lac de Mines, Haute-Savoie, France. --Tournasol7 05:22, 26 May 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:35, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Amanita muscaria near Lac de Mines, Haute-Savoie, France. --Tournasol7 05:22, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:35, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Massif du Mont-Blanc seen from Lac de Joux Plane in commune of Verchaix, Haute-Savoie, France. --Tournasol7 05:22, 26 May 2021 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Imehling 19:19, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Massif du Mont-Blanc seen from Lac de Joux Plane in commune of Verchaix, Haute-Savoie, France. --Tournasol7 05:22, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Imehling 19:19, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Lac de Tavaneuse in commune of Abondance, Haute-Savoie, France. --Tournasol7 05:22, 26 May 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:35, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Lac de Tavaneuse in commune of Abondance, Haute-Savoie, France. --Tournasol7 05:22, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:35, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Shell of a Cone snail, Conus fischoederi --Llez 05:16, 26 May 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:23, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Shell of a Cone snail, Conus fischoederi --Llez 05:16, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:23, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination "Faceless and historyless" by Margit Lehmann-Asperg, Pfinztal Sculpture Path --Llez 05:16, 26 May 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:23, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination "Faceless and historyless" by Margit Lehmann-Asperg, Pfinztal Sculpture Path --Llez 05:16, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:23, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Im Naturschutzgebiet "Kudensee und Umgebung" in Dithmarschen, Schleswig-Holstein. --Nightflyer 19:25, 25 May 2021 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Imehling 19:27, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Im Naturschutzgebiet "Kudensee und Umgebung" in Dithmarschen, Schleswig-Holstein. --Nightflyer 19:25, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Imehling 19:27, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Forum Romanum in Rome, Lazio, Italy. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 16:37, 25 May 2021 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:14, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Interior of S. Giovanni in Valle, Verona (Italy). Ancient Roman sarcophagi --Lo Scaligero 16:28, 25 May 2021 (UTC) * Decline The picture is very noisy. ISO 3200 doesn't work for qulity images. --Imehling 19:30, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Interior of S. Giovanni in Valle, Verona (Italy). Ancient Roman sarcophagi --Lo Scaligero 16:28, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Decline The picture is very noisy. ISO 3200 doesn't work for qulity images. --Imehling 19:30, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Sambor Prei KukI near Kampong Thom --PsamatheM 14:51, 25 May 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. Will be helpful to add the location (city/state/country) in the Caption and Description. --Tagooty 09:16, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Sambor Prei KukI near Kampong Thom --PsamatheM 14:51, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. Will be helpful to add the location (city/state/country) in the Caption and Description. --Tagooty 09:16, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Photo cassette 13X18. --Knopik-som 00:02, 25 May 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:09, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Photo cassette 13X18. --Knopik-som 00:02, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:09, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Radamanthys street, old town of Rethymno. --C messier 20:41, 23 May 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 08:52, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Radamanthys street, old town of Rethymno. --C messier 20:41, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Aristeas 08:52, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Ruins of the House of the Vestals in Rome, Lazio, Italy. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 16:58, 23 May 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 08:52, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Ruins of the House of the Vestals in Rome, Lazio, Italy. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 16:58, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Aristeas 08:52, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Adonis aestivalis, Czechia --Nefronus 18:12, 22 May 2021 (UTC) * Withdrawn  I withdraw my nomination – overexposed areas
  • * Nomination Weingut, neubarocke Mansardendachvilla, Ecktürme 1894, Maikammer, Südliche Weinstraße, Rheinland-Pfalz. --Fischer.H 17:35, 22 May 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality and beautiful. --Aristeas 08:53, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Weingut, neubarocke Mansardendachvilla, Ecktürme 1894, Maikammer, Südliche Weinstraße, Rheinland-Pfalz. --Fischer.H 17:35, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality and beautiful. --Aristeas 08:53, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Fire staff street performer in Brussels, Belgium --Trougnouf 23:34, 21 May 2021 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 03:55, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Fire staff street performer in Brussels, Belgium --Trougnouf 23:34, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 03:55, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Forum Romanum in Rome, Lazio, Italy. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 14:52, 21 May 2021 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 03:55, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Forum Romanum in Rome, Lazio, Italy. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 14:52, 21 May 2021 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 03:55, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Teide, Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain. 33 --Lmbuga 13:12, 21 May 2021 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. Nice composition but wrong camera settings (probably by accident ;-) --Moroder 03:55, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Teide, Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain. 33 --Lmbuga 13:12, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. Nice composition but wrong camera settings (probably by accident ;-) --Moroder 03:55, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Khas Mahal residence of Red Fort in New Delhi, India. --Argenberg 18:17, 19 May 2021 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 03:49, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Khas Mahal residence of Red Fort in New Delhi, India. --Argenberg 18:17, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 03:49, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Rostov-on-Don embankment and Don River at night, Rostov-on-Don, Russia. --Argenberg 18:17, 19 May 2021 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 03:49, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Rostov-on-Don embankment and Don River at night, Rostov-on-Don, Russia. --Argenberg 18:17, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 03:49, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Germany, Erden an der Mosel, Hauptstraße 39 --Berthold Werner 17:39, 19 May 2021 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 03:49, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Germany, Erden an der Mosel, Hauptstraße 39 --Berthold Werner 17:39, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 03:49, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Larus michahellis in Forum Romanum in Rome, Lazio, Italy. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 09:27, 19 May 2021 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 03:45, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Larus michahellis in Forum Romanum in Rome, Lazio, Italy. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 09:27, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 03:45, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Larus michahellis in Forum Romanum in Rome, Lazio, Italy. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 09:27, 19 May 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:24, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Larus michahellis in Forum Romanum in Rome, Lazio, Italy. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 09:27, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:24, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

Consensual review[edit]

File:Pag_town_view.jpg[edit]

File:Cafeginderguemes1.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Coffee shop Grinder, corner of Guemes and Avellaneda, Mar del Plata, Argentina --Ezarate 22:43, 13 May 2021 (UTC)  Comment The outsode is too dark imo --Moroder 12:30, 20 May 2021 (UTC) see now @Moroder: thanks!! --Ezarate 19:37, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Decline  Support Good quality. --Moroder 04:48, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
     Oppose Sorry, I disagree. Heavy CA, noise, crop, lack of detail --Rhododendrites 14:23, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Rhododendrites. --Nefronus 07:08, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Yes, too much noise. -- Ikan Kekek 08:23, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 09:59, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Montana_de_las_Arenas.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Montana de las Arenas --Imehling 10:17, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Focus is not sufficiently sharp over most of the image. --Tagooty 08:37, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Let's discuss that --Imehling 07:09, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
  •  Weak oppose I think the focus is good, but there is not enough details in the trees & parts of the landscape look a little washed out. --Nefronus 07:07, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 09:58, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Façade_Principale_Basilique_Sainte_Marie_Madeleine_-_Vézelay_(FR89)_-_2021-05-17_-_2.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination West facade of Basilique Sainte-Marie-Madeleine de Vézelay in France. --Chabe01 15:06, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Imehling 15:45, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. The sky is too dark and noisy + slight perspective correction needed. --Tournasol7 21:14, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
  •  Weak support No distortion in the photo: See the lines of the background bell tower. The sky seems too dark to me, but good picture--Lmbuga 13:34, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Nice but it gives the impression of falling to the left. That has to be changed imo--Moroder 05:53, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose the processing does not succeed; there are comperssion artefacts (especially visible on the top of tower) and I think a bit heavy on the NR (esp. bottom left).--Peulle 11:37, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Small perspective correction is necessary --Michielverbeek 20:14, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 09:58, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Kopfsalat_IMG_9515.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination: Bunte Salatmischung bei Gommersheim, Rheinland-Pfalz. --Fischer.H 17:04, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Review
  • chromatic aberration on the trees --Wilfredor 19:49, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done --Fischer.H 16:07, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Bad composition: Rule of thirds. Not sharp enough--Lmbuga 18:39, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Lmbuga. Nefronus 18:56, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support I rather like the composition, and a belief in a "rule" of thirds just promotes conventional compositions, which makes little sense to do after all of the modernism and avant garde work that's preceded us. Sharpness is OK, in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek 09:14, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support I can’t see why this photo would not be sharp enough, it’s completely OK, and the rule of thirds and all of its relatives are just rules of thumbs, not something like the Ten Commandments. --Aristeas 10:27, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support ok for me.--Ermell 09:30, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose only a part of the image looks good. Not in whole. --Gpkp 16:07, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
  •  Comment Good enough for QI. The category needs improvement: the sole CAT "Irrigation in Germany" is a rather minor part of the image. The crops in the fields are most prominent. --Tagooty 13:58, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Peulle 09:57, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Лион_Измайлов.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Lion Izmaylov (by Svklimkin) --1Veertje 18:32, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 21:37, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The image is unsharp and too noisy for QI, and when nominating you have to attribute the uploader (unless it's your image). --A.Savin 12:29, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose same problem. Seven Pandas 00:05, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support No noise problem. Also a wonderfully shot portrait in available light, in which the image noise, which is unavoidable under the given circumstances, is not disturbing at all. Although the focus is not perfectly on the eyes, this is only noticeable at 100% image size. At a normal viewing distance this does not bother, the photo can be used up to A4 or larger without any problems. The gentlemen of architecture, flash and stitching photography should take a closer look at this area of photography, and do so in their own practice, before they apply completely exaggerated standards. I, for one, would be very proud if I had managed to take such a picture. --Smial 08:22, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose very soft, hasn't caught subject well. Charlesjsharp 14:47, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support As Smial--Lmbuga 18:19, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
  •  Comment Again, I will support once the format of the nomination is edited to give the photographer credit. 1Veertje, please take care of that. -- Ikan Kekek 09:24, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
  •  Comment The photographer is credited in the picture. I'm the one making the statement that I think this picture should be QI. The credit to the author is in the file description. I'm not going to sign my statements with a different name. You're being extraordinary petty. I will forward the message of QI statement being awarded if that happens, as I've done before. 1Veertje 10:02, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Do I understand this correctly? The quality of a photo that otherwise meets all the formal requirements of "the rules" depends on whether the nominator has made a formal error? Both nominator and evaluator should please not be so stubborn for once. Typos or syntax errors in candidatures are also corrected in passing, even by uninvolved parties, so that the business runs here. This is supposed to be about good photos, not about legal disputes, isn't it? I have added the missing information without further ado. -- Smial 14:41, 19 May 2021 (UTC)Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)
  •  Support Thank you. Yes, it is a small thing. I've made sure to do it right every time I've nominated a photo here, and I think it's reasonable to expect, especially since A.Savin objected above. Of course the quality of the photo is by far the most important consideration. -- Ikan Kekek 19:57, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
  •  Comment I would find it very beneficial if 1Veertje would also follow the usual procedure in future, it simplifies the procedure here and it saves superfluous discussions. --Smial 21:53, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per others.--Peulle 10:21, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
    @1Veertje: It is not about crediting the photographer, but about correct QIC process. If picture is promoted, the QICbot has to notify the photographer, and not the nominator. Of course I never demanded from you to sign your comments with a different name. --A.Savin 12:16, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support considering the size of the file and overall quality, some technical shortcomings don't worry me Rhododendrites 13:26, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 09:57, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Parc_du_Vieux_Passage.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Parc du Vieux Passage --Wilfredor 18:22, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  • {{o}} Ultraprocessed IMO. Poor processing quality: See the green of the grass around the digger--Lmbuga 18:54, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
  • I think that its done now, thanks --Wilfredor 19:44, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
  • {{neutral}} Ultraprocessed IMO: Perhaps FP, but not QI IMO, sorry--Lmbuga 20:28, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support I think that for what this is trying to do, it works. At FPC I think this kind of style would be polarizing, but regardless of the style, the technical quality seems fine for QI. Large image, sharp subject, etc. No background CA :) Rhododendrites 13:40, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
  •  Weak oppose Per Lmbuga. --Nefronus 07:08, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Per Rhododendrites --Imehling 10:26, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, not QI for me. Unexplained color treatment--Lmbuga 18:07, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support I agree with Rhododendrites. The subject is sharp, and the colour treatment make it stand out from the background. I think the treatment is an artistic decision that may or may not be liked. On technical grounds, the photo is good in my opinion. --Lion-hearted85 (talk) 10:32, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
  •  Comment IMO quality is good, but the question is: do we accept selective saturation here? Tournasol7 06:02, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 09:56, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Quality_images_candidates/Archives_May_29_2021&oldid=565758937"