Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives November 01 2021

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Bremen,_Schnoorviertel,_Marterburg_--_2021_--_6454.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Relief at a house (Schnoor 1) in the street “Marterburg” in the Schnoorviertel in Bremen, Germany --XRay 03:54, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 03:54, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Tilted, bad crop. --Kallerna 15:38, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
  •  Info Sorry, no. It's not tilted. Or better: The wall itself is tilted. Please have a look to the next wall at the left. The cutout was chosen with the piece of wall on the left so you can see that the wall itself is tilted. --XRay 08:10, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
  • The crop is nevertheless poor. --Kallerna 18:37, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Poor framing -- Alvesgaspar 23:58, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
  • What do you think could be better? Just without the wall on the left? The wall/relief is tilted itself. Should I rotate the photograph, so the photograph is tilted? --XRay 03:16, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
  • I refer to the object caught by the camera near the bottom right. BTW, I also think the photo should concentrate on the central subject, ignoring the tilt of the bricks which is uninteresting. Alvesgaspar 11:38, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
  • I added an extracted image for central object. IMO it's not a good idea to change this image, so the solution could be good compromise for both. --XRay 10:04, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
  •  Info The wall is tilted itself. The photograph respects verticals and horizontals. The white wall at the left is nearly vertical, the brick wall isn't. --XRay 03:16, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support For sure the picture itself is not tilted. --Jakubhal 05:43, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Per Jakubhal. Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:56, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Small thing disturbing and useless in the bottom right. Needs a crop.--Jebulon 14:55, 23 October 2021 (UTC)--Jebulon 18:01, 26 October 2021 (UTC) I strike my oppose due to the correction.@XRay: I support *  Support now per Famberhorst.--Jebulon (talk) 18:08, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support I thought it was a bit strange myself. But on closer inspection I think it is the correct representation of the subject,--Famberhorst 15:58, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
  •  Question Is there a bit of purple CA on the right edge of the white wall? I agree on cropping out what's in the lower right. Otherwise, good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 01:23, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
  • @Alvesgaspar, Jebulon, and Kallerna: Thank you for your hint. It's fixed now. @Ikan Kekek: I haven't seen the CAs. They are removed now. --XRay 05:42, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Ikan Kekek 06:09, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Total: 6 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 13:02, 27 October 2021 (UTC)