Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives November 08 2014

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:2014_Nysa,_Dom_Wagi_Miejskiej_07.JPG[edit]

  • Nomination City Scales House in Nysa 2 --Jacek Halicki 22:00, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Sorry, but 70 nominations in 2 weeks is flooding.--Hubertl 07:06, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Comment Set to Discussion; IMO you can only withdraw images which you have nominated. --P e z i 22:13, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support QI IMO, description in English wood be appreciated. --P e z i 10:02, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
    • 🇬🇧...And maybe "would" should be more appreciated than "wood"...😃--Jebulon 21:02, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
      • To do a description "in English wood" is too problematic :) --Brateevsky 20:36, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support. Good quality. Not Featured, maybe, but it's a QI at least. --Brateevsky 20:36, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support Good lighting, no perspective distortion... --Gzzz 22:10, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Christian Ferrer 12:10, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

File:2014_Nysa,_Dom_Wagi_Miejskiej_09.JPG[edit]

  • Nomination City Scales House in Nysa 3 --Jacek Halicki 22:00, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Sorry, but 70 nominations in 2 weeks is flooding.--Hubertl 07:06, 23 October 2014 (UTC) Comment Set to Discussion; IMO you can only withdraw images which you have nominated. --P e z i 22:13, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support Good lighting, no perspective distortion... -- Gzzz 22:08, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Christian Ferrer 12:09, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

File:2014_Nysa,_Dom_Wagi_Miejskiej_15.JPG[edit]

  • Nomination City Scales House in Nysa 4 --Jacek Halicki 22:00, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Sorry, but 70 nominations in 2 weeks is flooding.--Hubertl 07:06, 23 October 2014 (UTC) Comment Set to Discussion; IMO you can only withdraw images which you have nominated. --P e z i 22:13, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support If I am right we have no limit per nominator. -- Spurzem 18:51, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Comment STOP THIS ! Imo, QIC is becoming completely crazy ! Here we have a flooder, an illegal delister because of flooding, a CR pusher because of illicit withdrawn, and a support vote because "no limit per nominator" !!!!!! And what about the picture ? Does somebody have a technical opinion about it ? --Jebulon 20:48, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Comment Yes Sir, I have also an opinion on the image; the reason for "pushing" to CR was to avoid treatment by the bot. BTW  Question what is the correct behaviour in that case? Setting back to "Nomination"? --P e z i 09:03, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Yes I think so. Sorry, I apologize, I was a bit angry, you were not my "target" in this case, but the situation was a bit strange, wasn'nt it ?--Jebulon 21:44, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support Sharpness is borderline, but still QI IMO. --P e z i 09:03, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Christian Ferrer 12:08, 7 November 2014 (UTC)