Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives November 08 2019

• 
  • Nomination Elementary school in Stolec --Jacek Halicki 00:23, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 00:24, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination St. Michael's Church in Fulda --Carschten 17:51, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 19:19, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Orangery and the sculpture “Floravase” in Fulda --Carschten 17:51, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Aristeas 18:44, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Palais von der Tann in Fulda --Carschten 17:51, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 22:37, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination near Stein im Jauntal in Carinthia, highway across the Drau --Michielverbeek 16:51, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 22:39, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Stein im Jauntal in Carinthia, church: katholische Pfarrkirche Sankt Laurentius --Michielverbeek 16:51, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. It's a little bit too dark. --XRay 22:39, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Obertrixen-Völkermarkt in Carinthia, houses in panorama from Mittertrixen --Michielverbeek 16:51, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support
    Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 16:58, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dhakeshwari National Temple during puja. By User:Shahriar Amin Fahim247 --RockyMasum 15:55, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Perspective distortion (look at the lady in the right corner) --Andrew J.Kurbiko 21:32, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Aerial view of Hardinge Bridge and Lalon Shah Bridge. By User:Abdulmominbd --RockyMasum 15:55, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline Useful photo but too noisy for QI, in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek 21:28, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Morris Minor 1000, 1970 --Berthold Werner 15:23, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support
    Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 16:55, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mikhail Chekman Park By User:Panchuk Valentyn --Anntinomy 12:36, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Overexposed. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 21:30, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Shevchenko Park in Dnipro. By User:Bodydock --Anntinomy 12:36, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline Nice composition, but unfortuantely too blurry --Michielverbeek 19:23, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Nature Reserve Chalkland flora. By User:Сергей Орлик --Anntinomy 12:36, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Noisy (esp when you look at the river) --Andrew J.Kurbiko 21:29, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Imphal, capital of the Indian state of Manipur, at dusk. By User:DeepanjanGhosh --Bodhisattwa 12:33, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support - Depth of field really could be longer. Beautiful, though, and good at 300% of my 13-inch laptop screen, but one does hope for better in these kinds of panoramas. I'd be fine with a discussion if anyone wants to give a different opinion. -- Ikan Kekek 21:31, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Stuttgart, Germany: The Johanneskirche (St. John’s church) seen over the lake. --Aristeas 10:17, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 15:43, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination DU GANITE AU JPN A PORTO NOVO AU BENIN --Adoscam 08:43, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Insufficient quality. Blurred --George Chernilevsky 14:37, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Place Bulgarie,Cotonou, au Bénin occcupé par les motos de fidèles musulmans pour la prière du vendredi.jpg --Adoscam 08:33, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Blown white --George Chernilevsky 14:44, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The former forester's lodge Schweigelberg, a guesthouse in the Franconian Switzerland. --Mikmaq 08:07, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support
    Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 08:15, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Vault with the Holy Spirit and angels in the Sant'Agata church in Brescia. --Moroder 07:15, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 07:42, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination NSU RO80 at the ADAC Deutschland Klassik 2018 --Ermell 06:54, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 07:04, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Two-horse carriage in motion --Ermell 06:54, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. Steady shot. --Axel Tschentscher 06:57, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Porsche 911 at ADAC Deutschland Klassik 2018 --Ermell 06:54, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Aristeas 10:07, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Porsche 911 Carrera 3.2 Coupé at the ADAC Deutschland Klassik 2018 --Ermell 06:54, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 07:04, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow Drophead at ADAC Deutschland Klassik 2018 --Ermell 06:54, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 07:22, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mountain tour from Val Sinestra via Zuort to Griosch. Rapids in the Brancla.
    --Famberhorst 06:42, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Axel Tschentscher 06:51, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mountain tour from Prümaran Prui via Alp Laret to Ftan. View of the surrounding mountains.
    --Famberhorst 06:42, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:09, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mountain path to the tongue of the Morteratsch glacier View of the zijmorene of the Morteratsch glacier.
    --Famberhorst 06:42, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:58, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mountain tour from S-charl a place in the Swiss canton Graubünden to Alp Sesvenna. View of the mountains from Alp Sesvenna.
    --Famberhorst 06:42, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Lens flare (see note) --George Chernilevsky 07:01, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
     Done. spots removed. Thanks for your reviews.--Famberhorst 07:28, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 07:35, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Objekt in der Kellergasse „Waasen" in Großweikersdorf (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 06:18, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:12, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Objekt in der Kellergasse „Waasen" in Großweikersdorf (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 06:18, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:12, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Treppenaufgang in der Kellergasse „Waasen" in Großweikersdorf (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 06:18, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:12, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Objekt in der Kellergasse „Waasen" in Großweikersdorf (Niederösterreich).. --Manfred Kuzel 06:18, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:39, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Objekt in der Kellergasse „Waasen" in Großweikersdorf (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 06:18, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:12, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Building at Georgenstraße 27 in Eisenach, Thuringia, Germany. --Tournasol7 06:15, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:36, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Statue in Sanssouci Park at night in Potsdam, Brandenburg, Germany. --Tournasol7 06:15, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 07:03, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Commandery of Hospitallers of Saint John in Lugan, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 06:15, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:33, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination White Cliffs in Pukearuhe in Taranaki Region, North Island of New Zealand. --Tournasol7 06:15, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Llez 07:17, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ramparts of the historic fortified city of Carcassone, Aude, France. --Tournasol7 06:15, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:35, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Mikmaq 08:10, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Small city gate in the eastern city wall of Villefranche-de-Conflent --Llez 05:40, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:30, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination City wall of Villefranche-de-Conflent, France --Llez 05:40, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:21, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Mikmaq 08:10, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination City wall of Villefranche-de-Conflent with the Fort Libéria in the background, France --Llez 05:40, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:31, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mountain tour from Lavin through Val Lavinuoz to Alp d'Immez (2025m.) Church of San Güerg Lavin. (Detail).
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:33, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Llez 05:47, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:21, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mountain tour from S-charl a place in the Swiss canton Graubünden to Alp Sesvenna. Erosion field along the mountain path.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:33, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Llez 05:48, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bargerveen Meerstalblok. Peat lake with growing peat bog.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:33, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:50, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Windows of the building at 214-226 Cashel Street --Podzemnik 05:30, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Llez 05:45, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 214-226 Cashel Street, Christchurch --Podzemnik 05:30, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:35, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 214-226 Cashel Street, Christchurch --Podzemnik 05:30, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality: very sharp throughout. --Axel Tschentscher 06:59, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 214-226 Cashel Street, Christchurch --Podzemnik 05:30, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:36, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cardboard Cathedral from the back, Christchurch --Podzemnik 05:30, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:15, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Antonov AN-70. By User:Tangopaso --undefined 05:00, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 05:38, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Antonov An-178. By User:Julian Herzog --undefined 05:00, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:29, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Vueling Airlines Airbus A320-214. By User:Julian Herzog --undefined 05:00, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Aristeas 11:25, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Niki Embraer 190LR. By User:Julian Herzog --undefined 05:00, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:26, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tunisair Boeing 737-6H3. By User:Julian Herzog --undefined 05:00, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 08:25, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Grave construction for the Gröblacher family at the old cemetery around the parish church in Köstenberg, Velden, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 04:28, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:21, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Grave construction for the Gröblacher family at the old cemetery around the parish church in Köstenberg, Velden, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 04:28, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:27, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Grave for the Jäger family at the old cemetery around the parish church in Köstenberg, Velden, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 04:28, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:28, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Grave for the Teppan family at the old cemetery around the parish church in Köstenberg, Velden, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 04:28, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:23, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Maya ceramic in the De Young Museum, San Francisco, California, U.S. By User:Daderot --Another Believer 02:46, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Noised --George Chernilevsky 07:00, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Maya ceramic in the De Young Museum, San Francisco, California, U.S. By User:Daderot --Another Believer 02:46, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose unfortunately very noisy --George Chernilevsky 06:56, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Maya ceramic in the De Young Museum, San Francisco, California, U.S. By User:Daderot --Another Believer 02:46, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Noised --George Chernilevsky 07:00, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Olmec figurine in the Gardiner Museum, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. By User:Daderot --Another Believer 02:46, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose unfortunately very noisy --George Chernilevsky 06:55, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chupícuaro pottery in the Gardiner Museum, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. By User:Daderot --Another Believer 02:46, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose unfortunately very noisy --George Chernilevsky 06:55, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Town hall in Ziębice 3 --Jacek Halicki 00:10, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Llez 05:43, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Town hall in Ziębice 4 --Jacek Halicki 00:10, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Llez 05:43, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Granary in Henryków --Jacek Halicki 00:10, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:24, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Mikmaq 08:10, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Johannesberg (Bavaria), Hauptstrasse 6, parish --KaiBorgeest 22:42, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Axel Tschentscher 06:26, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The church of Mary at Panagia, Crete. --C messier 17:12, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 18:21, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Mikmaq 08:10, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Entrance of the Fulda City Palace --Carschten 08:40, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Aristeas 10:12, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fulda Palace Garden with a bust, a fountain and the orangery (maybe this one is better than the previous one?) --Carschten 08:40, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Mikmaq 08:10, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fulda City Palace in its garden --Carschten 08:40, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Aristeas 10:13, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dourdou River near Nauviale, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 07:22, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Aristeas 10:14, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Vevey (Suisse) - Tour de l'Horloge, place Orientale. --Jmh2o 19:11, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Aristeas 10:15, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination National Park Dwingelderveld is a nature reserve in Drenthe Pinus sylvestris.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:58, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support
    Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:21, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
    This is one of the nicest in this series. I don't know whether it would be well received at FPC or not, but I certainly like it. -- Ikan Kekek 06:27, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
    @Ikan Kekek: Thank you for your compliment and the suggestion. I'm going to consider it--Agnes Monkelbaan 18:27, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Angelhead Santa Maria dei Miracoli church in Brescia. --Moroder 17:36, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support
    Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 08:35, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Santa Maria dei Miracoli church in Brescia detail of column. --Moroder 17:33, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support
    Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 08:35, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A way in the Fulda Palace Garden --Carschten 17:07, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support
    Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 08:27, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Imperial hall's terrace of the Fulda Palace Garden --Carschten 17:07, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support
    Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 08:27, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Greece, Mati, waterfront promenade --Berthold Werner 12:35, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Neutral a bit too soft. --EV Raudtee 16:03, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
     Support IMHO good quality; given that the waterfront promenade is the main subject, sharpness is OK. --Aristeas 18:47, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Étang d'Escales in PNR Pyrénées ariégeoises, commune of Auzat, Ariege, France. --Tournasol7 07:14, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Comment dust spots on the sky. --EV Raudtee 08:12, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
    Done. --Tournasol7 12:28, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
     Support Good quality now. --Aristeas 13:26, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Wikipedia Asian Month 2019 Banner in Sanskrit, --Suyash.dwivedi 19:32, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Crucifix by Paolo Costa in the Santa Maria dei Miracoli church in Brescia. --Moroder 19:21, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Review The description says "Crucifix by Paolo Costa 17th ..." But what about the two disturbing photos? Could you not put them down for a few minutes? -- Spurzem 19:48, 30 October 2019 (UTC) Comment Pope Paul VI for Brescia is more important than Jesus Christ ;-) --Moroder 22:14, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Monuments 2016. By User:Rodrigomarfan --A1Cafel 13:20, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: The Ashoka Pillar in Lumbini is one of the 3rd Century stone pillars built under the reign of Emperor Ashoka. By User:Shadow Ayush --Biplab Anand 10:33, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Panauti’s most famous temple set in a vast courtyard full of statuary on the isthmus between the Roshi and Pungamati rivers. By User:Shadow Ayush --Biplab Anand 10:33, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Dome in a lateral chapel in the Chiesa di San Gaetano church in Brescia. --Moroder 07:19, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Aristeas 18:42, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Consensual review

File:Sat_Gambuj_Mosque,_Dhaka.jpg

• Nomination Sat Gambuj Mosque, Dhaka. By User:Asif Ahmed Mazumder --RockyMasum 17:01, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Support. A little noisy but given the time of day, good choices were made in terms of f/stop, shutterspeed and ISO. --GRDN711 19:37, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose - I'm sorry, I was hoping to like this photo, but I think it's too noisy for QI. -- Ikan Kekek 22:41, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Ikan. Noise level surprisingly high for ISO1000. --Smial 10:35, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose, regretful, because I really like this photo – but the colour noise is extreme. Does somebody know the photographer and could ask him if he could provide the RAW file? Redeveloping this image with better software could boost the quality … --Aristeas 11:32, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment @Asif Ahmed Mazumder: Hello bro, please check the previous comments.--RockyMasum 17:43, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Seven Pandas 01:46, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Female_figure,_Mexico,_Jalisco,_200_BC_to_300_AD,_earthenware_and_pigment_-_De_Young_Museum_-_DSC00482.JPG

• Nomination Ancient Jalisco pottery in the De Young Museum, San Francisco, California, U.S. By User:Daderot --Another Believer 00:51, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
• Promotion
   Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:02, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose I disagree. Bad result with ISO 3200. Noised especially at the border of the figure --George Chernilevsky 15:05, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support - I'm guessing this is a pretty small figure. Seems sharp enough. -- Ikan Kekek 21:42, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 01:45, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Shoes_Auschwitz_I_2018.jpg

• Nomination Auschwitz Museum. By User:Tukka --Andrew J.Kurbiko 00:07, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose It looks like a color cast to the green --Cvmontuy 18:39, 4 November 2019 (UTC), Can you fix it?
  Improved a bit --Andrew J.Kurbiko 20:08, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
   Comment Still too green IMO, if you share the raw file I´ll try to fix this issue for you, --Cvmontuy 23:41, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
• Decline

I'm just nominating so have no raws. I will try to contact the author. --undefined 14:00, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined   --Seven Pandas 01:44, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Mannersdorf_Rochusberg_1.jpg

• Nomination Eingang zu den Kelleranlagen auf dem Rochusberg in Mannersdorf an der March (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 06:06, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Oppose Nice but only left column is sharp --Podzemnik 05:59, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
  
• Question: What is so fuzzy here that it justifies a "decline"? --Manfred Kuzel 07:05, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
• Weak  Support probably minimal camera shake, visible if the image is enlarged, but still good "enough" for QI. --Smial 12:17, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Good for me -- Spurzem 13:24, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Milseburg 14:23, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Maruia_Falls_06.jpg

• Nomination Maruia Falls on Maruia River in Tasman Region, South Island, New Zealand. --Tournasol7 07:15, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 07:17, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose at least for now. There's a weird kind of blurring on the far bank that looks like camera shake. Could you fix that? -- Ikan Kekek 08:23, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Ikan: camera shake. --Carschten 11:15, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Ikan.--Peulle 19:15, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   -- George Chernilevsky 23:32, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Großweikersdorf_Waasen_41.jpg

• Nomination Objekt in der Kellergasse „Waasen" in Großweikersdorf (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 06:49, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Comment Looks overexposed to me --Podzemnik 07:52, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

•  Comment The overexposure is done deliberately, so that the main theme, which is completely dark in the background, comes into its own. --Manfred Kuzel 16:15, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

•  Oppose per Podzemnik. Colours washed out. --Smial 08:53, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose overexposed --Carschten 11:17, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Milseburg 14:18, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Gate_of_the_Christchurch_Club,_Christchurch,_New_Zealand.jpg

• Nomination Gate of the Christchurch Club --Podzemnik 05:38, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality --Llez 05:58, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose I disagree. The bars on the right are crooked.--Steindy 17:47, 3 November 2019 (UTC) I returned my vote after I had to take note, I have no idea about photography. --Steindy 18:08, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Don't think you can blame the photographer --Moroder 10:56, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support looking at the building behind the gate, the verticals look good. QI to me. --Carschten 11:19, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Looks fine to me. --Axel 00:03, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Milseburg 14:17, 7 November 2019 (UTC))

File:Christchurch_Club,_Christchurch,_New_Zealand_02.jpg

• Nomination Christchurch Club --Podzemnik 05:38, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:51, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Big dust spot! --Steindy 17:57, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
   Comment I had to take note, I have no idea about photography. --Steindy 18:34, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

•  Done Removed. You don't have to oppose because of a dust spot as the image now will be sent to discussion and use energy from other users --Podzemnik 03:59, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

•  Support Mine included --Moroder 10:58, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Carschten 11:20, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Milseburg 14:16, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Phalaenopsis_orchidee_(actm)_08.jpg

• Nomination Phalaenopsis orchidee. Flowering houseplant in the Netherlands.
  --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:35, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:40, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose I think it's too dark. The petals seem gray, but in reality they are spotless white. --Till.niermann 06:54, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment Excellent sharpness, but there is some noise, and a white point is too low. --Stoxastikos 13:30, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

•  Done. Noise suppressed and another WB. Thanks for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan 17:58, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

•  Support --Moroder 10:59, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Fine now. --Axel 00:04, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Milseburg 14:15, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

File:The_Nativity,_from_the_Life_of_Christ,_Barberini_Tapestries,_Rome,_1644-1656_-_Jordan_Schnitzer_Museum_of_Art,_University_of_Oregon_-_Eugene,_Oregon_-_DSC09429.jpg

• Nomination Life of Christ (Barberini Tapestries), Jordan Schnitzer Museum of Art, Oregon, U.S. By User:Daderot --Another Believer 01:24, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
• Decline
   Oppose Quite easy to take shot - just a flat picture. I find the quality not very impressive + I'd like to see perspective correction so the artwork sides ares straight --Podzemnik 05:45, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
   Support I disagree. Is it conceivable that historical shawls are not straight, but distorted? --Steindy 20:43, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
   I withdraw my support after I had to take note, I have no idea about photography. --Steindy 19:54, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined   -- George Chernilevsky 23:34, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

File:The_Adoration_of_the_Magi,_from_the_Life_of_Christ,_Barberini_Tapestries,_Rome,_1644-1656_-_Jordan_Schnitzer_Museum_of_Art,_University_of_Oregon_-_Eugene,_Oregon_-_DSC09434.jpg

• Nomination Life of Christ (Barberini Tapestries), Jordan Schnitzer Museum of Art, Oregon, U.S. By User:Daderot --Another Believer 01:24, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
• Decline
   Oppose Quite easy to take shot - just a flat picture. I find the quality not very impressive + I'd like to see perspective correction so the artwork sides ares straight --Podzemnik 05:45, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
   Support I disagree. Is it conceivable that historical shawls are not straight, but distorted? --Steindy 20:43, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
   I withdraw my support after I had to take note, I have no idea about photography. --Steindy 19:55, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined   --George Chernilevsky 23:34, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Royal_Air_Maroc_Boeing_737-7B6_CN-ROD_MUC_2015_01.jpg

• Nomination CN-ROD (aircraft). By User:Julian Herzog --User:Andrew J.Kurbiko 00:14, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
• Promotion
  
•  Oppose I think the the right crop is too tight --Podzemnik 05:45, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
  
•  Support All here and all to see. Good quality. --Steindy 18:50, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Good image for me, though the crop is a bit tight. -- Spurzem 17:27, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support - Fine for me. Tight crop behind the plane and lead room ahead of it is fine, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 22:51, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Milseburg 14:13, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Charents_arch-msu-wlm-3093.jpg

• Nomination Charents Arc, Ararat Arc. By User:Matthias Süßen --Արման Բարսեղյան 13:00, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Oppose The way it is cropped is just killing me. And no category. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 19:22, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support - Categories were added, the crop is fine to me and the photo is sufficiently sharp at 300% of my full screen, so I think it's good enough for QI. -- Ikan Kekek 06:33, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support If there was a little more at the top of the frame, suggest cropping higher. Good composition. Support for QI --GRDN711 20:03, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support IMHO really good. --Aristeas 10:40, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Is this already FP candidate? --Smial 15:18, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   -- George Chernilevsky 23:29, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Triptych_of_Sts._Peter,_Luke,_John_Baptist,_Matthew,_and_John_the_Evangelist,_perhaps_Palkekh_school,_early_1600s,_tempera_-_Jordan_Schnitzer_Museum_of_Art,_University_of_Oregon_-_Eugene,_Oregon_-_DSC09275.jpg

• Nomination Russian icon in the Jordan Schnitzer Museum of Art, University of Oregon, U.S. By User:Daderot --Another Believer 00:05, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• Decline
   Oppose Unsharp to me --Podzemnik 06:01, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support I disagree. Sharp enough for me, because we do not know the original. --Steindy 23:50, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
   I withdraw my support after I had to take note, I have no idea about photography. --Steindy 19:57, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose - The originals are unlikely to be unsharp in this way. We know the style. -- Ikan Kekek 22:55, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Milseburg 14:12, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Quadrupite_icon_of_the_Mother_of_God,_Chernigov_Region,_late_1700s,_egg_tempera_and_silver_on_wood_-_Jordan_Schnitzer_Museum_of_Art,_University_of_Oregon_-_Eugene,_Oregon_-_DSC09251.jpg

• Nomination Russian icon in the Jordan Schnitzer Museum of Art, University of Oregon, U.S. By User:Daderot --Another Believer 00:05, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:36, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
   I withdraw my support after I had to take note, I have no idea about photography. --Steindy 20:10, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

@Steindy: Sind die Farbe und die durch die kurze Brenn­weite verursachte per­spek­tivische Ver­zerrung wirklich gut? -- Spurzem 14:21, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

 Comment Spurzem, nachdem ich das Original selbstverständlich nicht kenne, erlaube ich mir dazu kein Urteil, sondern vertraue grundsätzlich dem Bildautror. Die Wandhaken sind jedenfalls scharf weshalb das Foto nicht unscharf sein kann. Grundsätzlich scheint es derzeit ein "Sport" von Podzemik zu sein, bei allem und leden konträr zu mir zu stimmen, um zu zeigen, welch Idiot ich bin; allein gestern etwa 10 Mal. Solches Veralten macht mich einfach traurig... --Steindy 20:43, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

•  Oppose Is it good quality? To be it's quite blurry considering it's a flat object which is very easy to take a picture of. Please discuss --Podzemnik 06:01, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Podzemnik. Even if it's not completely flat, which it might not be. -- Ikan Kekek 22:56, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Milseburg 14:11, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Mother_of_God_of_Kazan,_1700s,_egg_tempera_on_wood_-_Jordan_Schnitzer_Museum_of_Art,_University_of_Oregon_-_Eugene,_Oregon_-_DSC09257.jpg

• Nomination Russian icon in the Jordan Schnitzer Museum of Art, University of Oregon, U.S. By User:Daderot --Another Believer 00:05, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:38, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

•  I withdraw my support after I had to take note, I have no idea about photography. --Steindy 20:14, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

•  Oppose Edges are just too unsharp IMO for such an easy to take picture --Podzemnik 06:01, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Podzemnik -- George Chernilevsky 14:36, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --George Chernilevsky 23:28, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Calendar_icons_for_April,_perhaps_Mstera_School,_late_1700s_to_early_1800s,_egg_tempera,_gold_leaf,_on_wood_-_Jordan_Schnitzer_Museum_of_Art,_University_of_Oregon_-_Eugene,_Oregon_-_DSC09277.jpg

• Nomination Russian icon in the Jordan Schnitzer Museum of Art, University of Oregon, U.S. By User:Daderot --Another Believer 00:05, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• Decline
   Oppose UNsharp --Podzemnik 06:03, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support I disagree. Sharp enough for me, because we do not know the original. --Steindy 23:50, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

•  I withdraw my support after I had to take note, I have no idea about photography. --Steindy 20:16, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

•  Comment The image is better than the next one. But I don't think that it is QI. -- Spurzem 14:11, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Podzemnik. -- Ikan Kekek 22:58, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Milseburg 14:10, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Calendar_icons_for_November,_perhaps_Mstera_School,_late_1700s_to_early_1800s,_egg_tempera,_gold_leaf,_on_wood_-_Jordan_Schnitzer_Museum_of_Art,_University_of_Oregon_-_Eugene,_Oregon_-_DSC09281.jpg

• Nomination Russian icon in the Jordan Schnitzer Museum of Art, University of Oregon, U.S. By User:Daderot --Another Believer 00:05, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• Decline
   Oppose Unsharp --Podzemnik 06:03, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
   Support I disagree. Sharp enough for me, because we do not know the original. --Steindy 23:51, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose I can imagine the difficult conditions to take this photo. But the object seems distorted and obviously it is too red. -- Spurzem 12:45, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

•  Comment @ Spurzem: Siehe meine Antwort weiter oben. --Steindy 20:50, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

•  Oppose per others. Granted, we weren't there. So in that case, we should just let any old photo of these icons pass? No. We have to use logic and make judgments based on what we know and can gather from available evidence. -- Ikan Kekek 23:00, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Milseburg 14:09, 7 November 2019 (UTC))

File:Brücke_mit_Wegweiser_20190819_002.jpg

• Nomination A cabin in Carinthia made out of wood. --PantheraLeo1359531 20:43, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
• Decline
   Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:14, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
   I withdraw my support after I had to take note, I have no idea about photography. --Steindy 18:32, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
   Oppose I disagree for now. It looks underexposed to me --Podzemnik 08:04, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
   Oppose per Podzemnik --GRDN711 20:38, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 20:55, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Karlhochkogel_04.jpg

• Nomination Karlhochkogel seen from the southwest, Hochschwab (Styria) --Clemens Stockner 13:07, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Oppose Looks too soft to me --Poco a poco 18:48, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. --Moroder 09:47, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support - Seems OK to me for QI, really not bad. -- Ikan Kekek 23:02, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support OK for me, much better than oversharpening. --Aristeas 10:43, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Sharp enough. Appealing colours, composition and lighting. --Smial 12:39, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Milseburg 14:07, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Mannersdorf_Rochusberg_3.jpg

• Nomination Objekt auf dem Rochusberg in Mannersdorf an der March (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 06:06, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:31, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
   Oppose I disagree. Stripes in the sky again. --Ermell 22:56, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
   Oppose per Ermell.--Peulle 08:43, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
  
•  Done: Reworked with another software. --Manfred Kuzel 06:56, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support solved --Ermell 08:58, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Carschten 11:53, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

File:19-11-01-Kulturforum-Berlin-RalfR_DSF3889.jpg

• Nomination Kulturforum Berlin, Haupteingang --Ralf Roletschek 23:18, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:01, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
   I withdraw my support after I had to take note, I have no idea about photography. --Steindy 18:27, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose I disagree. Feels overprocessed. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 19:20, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support I can’t see overprocessing. Maybe the sky is a bit too staturated, yes, and personally I would crop this image at the top and at the bottom. But quality is OK. --Aristeas 10:50, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Andrew. --Smial 11:31, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 20:55, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Павук-стрибун_у_Рівненському_природному_заповіднику.jpg

• Nomination A jumping spider in the Rivnens'kiy Nature Reserve by User:Dimatrofimchuk --Anntinomy 11:34, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
• Decline
  please, specify the scientific name of the spider and add categories --Andrew J.Kurbiko 13:39, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
  done --Anntinomy 14:04, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
   Support Good quality. --Chenspec 07:42, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
   Oppose Only family is listed in the category. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 19:11, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Andrew. To my knowledge, at least the genus is required for QI. -- Ikan Kekek 07:07, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support quality image --Ralf Roletschek 10:37, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

•  Question - Why do you persist in ignoring the categorization requirements for QI? You should propose a change in the rules instead of engaging in jury nullification. -- Ikan Kekek 23:09, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

•  Oppose per others.--Peulle 19:12, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 20:54, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Jali Arch on the entrance of Dargah Hazrath Syed Shah Moosa Quadri in Hussaini Alam 2.jpg

• Nomination Architecture of Dargah Hazrath Syed Shah Moosa Quadri in Hussaini Alam. --IM3847 13:13, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
• Promotion Good quality, nice detailed photo but please add some categories and geo location--Michielverbeek 14:05, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
  Thanks, I've added location and Categories --IM3847 03:34, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment - Good quality, but the file description should be clearer. -- Ikan Kekek 05:13, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
   Support Well done --Michielverbeek 08:52, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support - Thanks for the updates. Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 01:45, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Carschten 11:50, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Entrance arches of Toli Masjid 5.jpg

• Nomination Entrance arches in Toli Masjid, Hyderabad. --IM3847 13:13, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
• Promotion  Support
  Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 14:01, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
  Please add more categories and geo-location --Michielverbeek 14:08, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
  Thanks, I've added location and Categories --IM3847 03:34, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment - Good quality, but the file description should more clearly describe what we're looking at, much as your description of the file in this nomination does. -- Ikan Kekek 05:15, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
  * Support Well done --Michielverbeek 08:53, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support - Thanks for the updates. Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 01:46, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Axel 00:06, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   -- George Chernilevsky 12:16, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Architectural detail on Entrance arches of Toli Masjid.jpg

• Nomination Entrance Arches of Toli Masjid in Hyderabad. --IM3847 13:13, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
• Promotion  Support
  Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 14:02, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
  Please add more categories and geo-location --Michielverbeek 14:08, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
  Thanks, I've added location and Categories --IM3847 03:34, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment - Ditto to my comments above. Fix the file description, and then it'll be a QI. -- Ikan Kekek 05:18, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
   Support Well done --Michielverbeek 08:54, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment - @Ikan Kekek: Thanks, I've requested rename for all the files.--IM3847 (talk) 12:34, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support - Thanks for the updates. Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 01:48, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Axel 00:07, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   -- George Chernilevsky 12:17, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Mannersdorf_Rochusberg_39_1.jpg

• Nomination Weingut Roland Minkowitsch auf dem Rochusberg in Mannersdorf an der March (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 05:38, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
• Promotion
  Please check the verticals. --Ermell 07:21, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
   Done
  Thank you for review. New version uploaded.--Manfred Kuzel 13:03, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
  The right side of the building is still not o.k. --Ermell 07:20, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
  @Ermell: Please clear browser cache (Ctrl + F5). --Manfred Kuzel 11:51, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Support - Looks alright to me. -- Ikan Kekek 06:13, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Okay, good quality. --Steindy 20:59, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
   I withdraw my support after I had to take note, I have no idea about photography. --Steindy 18:21, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   -- George Chernilevsky 23:26, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Bronze_bands_with_Striding_Griffins,_view_1,_Iran,_probably_Persepolis,_Achaemenid_Period,_550-330_BC,_bronze_-_Oriental_Institute_Museum,_University_of_Chicago_-_DSC07996.JPG

• Nomination Striding Griffins (Oriental Institute), University of Chicago, Illinois, U.S. By User:Daderot --Another Believer 15:21, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:14, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
   I withdraw my support after I had to take note, I have no idea about photography. --Steindy 18:22, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose I disagree. Low DOF, some part out of focus. Useful photo, but not QI --George Chernilevsky 16:11, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per George.--Peulle 19:12, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   George Chernilevsky 23:25, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Fantoft_stavkirke,_Bergen,_Noruega,_2019-09-08,_DD_81-83_HDR.jpg

• Nomination Fantoft stavkirke, Bergen, Norway --Poco a poco 09:22, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Comment HDR errors in the branches, can you fix that? --Carschten 13:12, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

• New version uploaded, please, have a look --Poco a poco 07:55, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

• better, but there are still some errors. I marked them with annotations. --Carschten 10:33, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

•  Support Good quality. --Chenspec 07:42, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose until the HDR errors are fixed --Carschten 17:09, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

•  Support much better now! There are still some tiny issues, but good enough for QI and very good corrections. --Carschten 11:06, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

•  Oppose for now. Serious errors - double leaves and stems, etc. -- Ikan Kekek 07:06, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose for now per Ikan -- George Chernilevsky 08:56, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

•  Neutral small problems remain, but they are not enough for oppose -- George Chernilevsky 11:26, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

•  Support Yes, we can overdo with demands but we should not as I think. -- Spurzem 09:54, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment Ikan, George, Carschten there's a new version Poco a poco 11:47, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

• Unfortunately, the problem is not resolved. Errors due to the movement of branches in the wind remained visible --George Chernilevsky 11:57, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

• It's better, but I'd still like more improvement on the leaves at the upper left. -- Ikan Kekek 18:03, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

•  Comment Ikan, George, Carschten last version uploaded --Poco a poco 13:36, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

• There are still some double leaves, so I'm really still not satisfied. Sorry. -- Ikan Kekek 01:50, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

• Sorry, Ikan Kekek, I cannot see any double leaves, and if fact there cannot be any anymore as the leaves come from one single frame now. Could you add a note? Poco a poco 15:49, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

•  Support - I think you got them in your last edit, which I guess happened after my last message. To be sure, some leaves are a little unsharp, but that's OK. -- Ikan Kekek 23:13, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Carschten 11:49, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

File:WRJCH_2018-08-11_JM2x_Final_C_(Martin_Rulsch)_20.jpg

• Nomination Junior Men's Double Sculls at 2018 World Rowing Junior Championships. By User:DerHexer --Andrew J.Kurbiko 00:34, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
• Promotion
  
•  Oppose Sorry! Photographing athletes from the back is never a good idea. --Steindy 13:03, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
   Comment I had to take note, I have no idea about photography. --Steindy 18:20, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
  
•  Support I disagree. It's a good action shot. Please discuss --MB-one 17:00, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Support per MB-one. -- Ikan Kekek 07:09, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Very good for me -- Spurzem 09:56, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Perfectly acceptable composition. Very sharp.--Peulle 08:41, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Good composition. --Palauenc05 17:00, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, looks somewhat overexposed to me. Colour channel clipping. --Smial 10:43, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Milseburg 14:06, 7 November 2019 (UTC))

File:Ayuntamiento,_Sintra,_Portugal,_2019-05-25,_DD_01.jpg

• Nomination Câmara Municipal de Sintra, Sintra, Portugal --Poco a poco 12:55, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  I withdraw my support Good quality, but kind of low resolution for Canon EOS 5DS R --EV Raudtee (talk) 16:20, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Yes, too low, I think. Perhaps we should revisit this discussion; I can't see any obvious reason this particular image needed to be downsized this heavily.--Peulle 13:56, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
• Ok, let's stir shit again...this image was taken as I uploaded it. I used a small raw version, is that fine with the project? Poco a poco 22:03, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

•  Question I am not sure I understand what that means. I am seeing the camera's capacity of 8688 × 5792 pixels, so this one appears to have been reduced to a third of that size, is that not correct? I can understand cropping and such being necessary in city environments, but reducing an image by 60 % won't do it for me.--Peulle (talk) 07:27, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

• This camera has different options for the RAW files, full size RAW, medium size RAW and small size RAW, I did not opt for the full size RAW. The image has not been downsampled, is it forbidden to choose other RAW formats that the full RAW format? Poco a poco 19:47, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

•  Support Ich wundere mich täglich mehr, was hier seitens einiger Leute beanstandet wird. Mich stören allenfalls die Autos vor dem Gebäude, die sich aber kaum wegnehmen lassen, und die leichten Verzerrungen. Aber was Schärfe, Farben und vor allem Aussagekraft betrifft, ist das Bild gut. -- Spurzem 07:42, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose, sorry. "Six mpixels are enough" for most purposes, but this is below six mpixels, and it's not a very difficult subject to photograph. I don't have a problem with appropriate downscaling, but at least six Mpixels should be possible with that camera. --Smial 09:46, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Support I agree with Spurzem. --Steindy 22:35, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
   I withdraw my support after I had to take note, I have no idea about photography. --Steindy 18:17, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support nothing wrong IMO.--Ermell 08:48, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Ralf Roletschek 23:22, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Andrew J.Kurbiko 19:29, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• Has software perspective adjustment been used? It feels as though the top of the building is stretched outward compared to the base of the building.--Bobulous (talk) 18:29, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
• weak  Support - Yeah it's quite small and I wouldn't nominate an own image with that resolution. The perspective correction is quite visible und it looks a bit unnatural due to the distortion. But still ok. Maybe I am quite finicky, fussy (what's the right word?) but I would have removed the two leaves (or whatever it is) that hang into the picture on the right side. -- DerFussi 16:26, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   -- Seven Pandas 01:42, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Beatrice_Cenci.jpg

• Nomination Beatrice Cenci--IKKos 19:14, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality -- Spurzem 19:20, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose No QI without correct identification and categorization of the original artwork and its creator. --A.Savin 21:05, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

• The painting is very well photographed and the photo is included in almost 40 articles. At least one of these articles also mentions the probable painter. So what's the problem? -- Spurzem 08:33, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

• The categorization seems correct, doesn't it? But I agree that the description is not very good.--Peulle (talk) 09:38, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

•  Oppose I strongly agree with Savin and Peulle. It's regrettable thas very often images with inadequate file description and categorisation are nominated and promoted for QIC --Moroder 10:38, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

Do we judge pictures or picture descriptions here? -- Spurzem 11:38, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

@Spurzem: Please read the guidelines!--Moroder 11:58, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

That's no answer to my question. Apparently, the picture is clearly enough described or so well known that it is involved in almost 40 articles.-- Spurzem 12:13, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

The answer to your question is: "Both". Both image quality and file pages are part of what should be judged in QIC. Quality alone is simply not enough.--Peulle 14:01, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

•  Support Quality Image. Here are no "Quality Categorisation/Description Candidates" --Ralf Roletschek 16:38, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
• The image is not totally undescribed and uncategorized. I agree that both description and categorization may have been better, but then, there is always some place for improvement, no matter what and no matter how many. Stoxastikos 17:33, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
  •  Comment @Ralf Roletschek: , @Spurzem: Quality images candidates#Guidelines Quality images shall have a meaningful file name, be properly categorized and have an accurate description on the file page in one or more languages. It is preferred, but not mandatory, to include an English description. --Moroder 17:36, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Support I've added a file description according to the article in the Englisch wiki. That may help. It's a very fine picture, anyway. --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:12, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Good now. In case someone wonders why we others didn't make the additions ourselves, it is because we encourage uploaders/nominators to take care of such things themselves before nominating.--Peulle 07:34, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose I have now googled countless images of Beatrice Cenci, and there are several variants of them that are very similar to the one shown. Obviously painters have copied from each other from time to time. Not one of the other paintings outside of commons shows such a pure white in the clothes and no other such a rosy face. I think that our candidate is overcorrected and probably does not correspond to the original in terms of colors. --Smial 09:59, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
  •  Comment Well, it's not a painting housed in Palazzo Barberini, for sure. There is a good picture of the painting in question on the official site of the Galleria, and it has an inscription at the lower left corner ("F.132" or something like that). Meaning this one is probably a photo of a copy housed elsewhere. Meaning also that it can differ somewhat from the original in color and tint, being made much later and having less time to fade, for example. The tint may also depend on the lighting conditions prevalent in the room: different museums use different lamps. I think, in our case the tint is minimal and the colors look more or less neutral. And I saw a lot of pictures in the internet that were literally yellow, as if they were photographed in the rooms lit by sodium lamps at 2800K. Stoxastikos (talk) 19:40, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

•  Oppose - The file description doesn't say where this painting is, and if it's not in the Palazzo Barberini, this file's presence in Galleria Nazionale d'Arte Antica is wrong. Also, if the painting is really that white, I think it's been overcleaned (which, sadly, is certainly possible, as I have personally seen that many paintings in Italy [and certainly not only in Italy] have been gravely damaged by overcleaning by overzealous "restorers"). -- Ikan Kekek 07:49, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

•  Oppose @Ikan Kekek: It's a valid point you have raised. The categorization of the file may be wrong, and in that case it shouldn't be promoted according to the rules. I have to withdraw my support for now, until the provenience of the file will be established or explained by the author in the description. Stoxastikos (talk) 19:43, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

•  Oppose Per Ikan. --Podzemnik 06:06, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
• Stoxastikos Is a very good pic in the Galleria of Barberini palace...overcleaning is totally ridiculous --undefined 09:36, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 6 oppose → Declined   --Carschten 11:48, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Mangart_13.jpg

• Nomination Mangart Pass seen from the Via Ferrata trail going up to the mountain. --Kallerna 05:43, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:17, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 06:20, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Too bright in the upper left part. I don´t think the light management has succeeded here. Not a QI for me. --Milseburg 12:57, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Milseburg. Let's have further discussion. -- Ikan Kekek 05:44, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Milseburg. --EV Raudtee 16:10, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Support This is a very nice picture and the bright sky makes it only more dramatic --Moroder 21:20, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Quite an interesting light. --Podzemnik 06:08, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support - I've changed my mind. This light is realistic and it is interesting. -- Ikan Kekek 23:08, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Ikan Kekek 23:08, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Морозний_карпатський_ранок.jpg

• Nomination Carpathian National Nature Park. By User:Vian --Andrew J.Kurbiko 07:21, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
• Promotion
• Sensor pattern in the sky. --Steindy 09:46, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. --Chenspec 10:29, 25 October 2019 (UTC)

•  Oppose I disagree. How I said, sensor pattern. --Steindy 08:54, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

•  Oppose - Lines in sky. -- Ikan Kekek 07:28, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Lines, yes. Sort of curved. --Peulle 11:48, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Info @Ikan Kekek: , @Peulle: , @Steindy: color banding reduced. --EV Raudtee 12:08, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Support ok. -- Smial 13:27, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Okay now, good quality. --Steindy 18:13, 28 October 2019 (UTC)  I withdraw my support after I had to take note, I have no idea about photography. --Steindy 18:10, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support per Steindy. Not perfect but certainly good enough for QI. -- Ikan Kekek 04:22, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose banding is not o.k.--Ermell 18:04, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per others. The vignetting in the top corners look unreal to me. --Podzemnik 06:10, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Clear QI for me. --Milseburg 12:43, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Clear, well lit, and appealing composition.--Bobulous 18:21, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Promoted   --Milseburg 14:03, 7 November 2019 (UTC)