Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives November 16 2022

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Eckersdorf_OT_Hardt_360_pano.jpg[edit]

360°

  • Nomination 360° Aerial panorama of Hardt, part of the municipality of Eckersdorf, district Bayreuth, Germany By --J. Lunau 18:37, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  OpposeI don't think the area around the zenith and the sun succeeded. --Milseburg 20:07, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
  •  Comment Thanks for your review and your hints. I have uploaded a new version (reduced highlights, retouched lense flairs) and would like to here more opinions.--J. Lunau 15:49, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
    •  Comment It is too obvious that the zenith region has been interpolated. Especially with regard to the clouds, this area does not fit sufficiently coherently to the rest of the image. --Milseburg 17:17, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
    •  Comment Thanks again, @Milseburg. The embeded stitcher of my photodevice (DJI) obviosly does have limits. I uploaded a new version, stitched with Hugin. IMHO it is still not perfect but looks much better.
  •  Oppose The sun looks like a nova in that photo. The sun is not that big. -- Ikan Kekek 13:18, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The too high contrast has exceeded the capabilities of the camera technology. It is possible to get a usable photo when the sun is even lower or when the sky is veiled or slightly cloudy. --Smial 12:58, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 11:39, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

File:Kochi,_Fishing_nets_2,_Kerala,_India.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Fishing nets (cheena vala) at sunset. Fort Kochi, Cochin, Kerala. --Argenberg 19:27, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Subject is underexposed, sorry. --BigDom 08:42, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
  • I disagree. The subject is adequately exposed for this type of overcast sunset lighting. A typical sunset/twilight scene in Kochi Bay with a focus on Chinese fishing net outline. --Argenberg 15:38, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
    • Fair point. I've struck my oppose for the exposure but I agree with the comments below about the CAs. BigDom 13:57, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Visible CA (red/green type). Would support if fixed. Composition, colours, exposure and lighting are nice, sharpness and noise acceptable. --Smial 00:27, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose CAs and tilted - both should be correctable PtrQs 11:49, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 11:39, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

File:20220715_Neue_Fröttmaninger_Heide_11.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination A cuckoo bumblebee and ants on a knapweed flower --FlocciNivis 11:53, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Support Good quality. --Drow male 12:38, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
     Oppose Eyes are not sharp. Sorry. --Ermell 20:47, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Unfortunate lighting. IMO not fixable. --Smial 12:33, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 11:38, 15 November 2022 (UTC)