Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives November 18 2018

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Liebenfels_Hoch-Liebenfels_Burgruine_Burgtor_29122016_5933.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Portal of the castle-ruin in Hoch-Liebenfels, Liebenfels, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:03, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Vengolis 03:19, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment. Is it really good? I see a very disturbing shadow. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 19:52, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done @Spurzem: I brightened up the shadows and cropped out some of the most disturbing parts. --Johann Jaritz 04:11, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose  Neutral I still see the very disturbing shadows of the branches over the door. You had apparently caught the wrong time of day for this photo. It's a pity. -- Spurzem 17:32, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support - I'm not very disturbed by shadows of branches on a door. Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 08:45, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment Thank you very much for your kind support, Ikan. -- Johann Jaritz 15:05, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
  • You're welcome, but it's not a favor, I'm just being honest about my reaction to the photo. Reflections of branches can actually be nice sometimes. Ikan Kekek 19:04, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality, I don't see anything wrong with this shadow. --Trougnouf 19:51, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support per Trougnouf. --Smial 09:24, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
Ich merke, dass ich bislang zu wenig Ahnung von Bildgestaltung habe, und werde versuchen, bei künftigen Fotos von Kunstwerken oder Gebäuden möglichst auch Schatten von Zweigen auf dem Hauptmotiv zu haben. Auf die Bewertung hier bin ich gespannt. Ich werde es nachher schon mal mit einem fast unvermeidlichen Schlagschatten versuchen; vielleicht erziele ich damit schon einen positiven Effekt. ;-) Gruß -- Spurzem 10:44, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
 Comment File:MARTa Aussendetail IMGP2517 wp.jpg --Smial 11:13, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
@Smial: Bei dieser Aufnahme sind die Schatten ein Teil der Bildkomposition und nicht zufälliges Gewusel. Aber wie Du sagst: Über Geschmack zu streiten ist selten zielführend. Viele Grüße -- Spurzem 12:18, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
 Comment Lothar, es spricht dir doch niemand ab, deine Meinung kundzutun und entsprechend abzustimmen. Nimm es nicht persönlich, wenn andere andere Meinungen haben. Über Geschmack streiten ist selten zielführend. Schlimmer ist es, wenn man bei objektiv meßbaren Kriterien wider den Tatsachen überstimmt wird. Aber auch dann frißt man halt meist stillschweigend die Kröte. --Smial 11:20, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Basotxerri 17:44, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Nostra_Signora_del_Sacro_Cuore_Cristo_in_legno_di_ulivo.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Sculpture of Christ bearing the cros in olive wood in the Nostra Signora del Sacro Cuore church in Rome. --Moroder 17:57, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Thumbnail is quiet nice, but unfortunately the image is for me not sharp enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 20:10, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
  • I disagree --Moroder 21:12, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support - Bad upper right crop, but quality is acceptable at 300% of my 13-inch laptop screen. -- Ikan Kekek 02:40, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Michiel. Camera shake? --Basotxerri 09:20, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment Please compare this image with most of the QIC images and give a objective judgment indipendent from the camera I used --Moroder 20:56, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment When I reviewed the image, I didn't check what camera you used. Look at the Christ's face at 100%, it's really unsharp. It seems that the camera wasn't stable on the tripod during the shot, I guess. --Basotxerri 17:31, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Not sharp.--Peulle 11:43, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Good composition, lighting, and colours, but focus not on the face. --Smial 11:28, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Basotxerri 17:43, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Humboldt_Penguin_(Spheniscus_humboldti)_(Mouth_open)_(CWPG).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Humboldt Penguin (Spheniscus humboldti) (Mouth open) (CWPG) --Vauxford 14:14, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Neutral I've noticed that recently many slightly lower-quality bird picture submissions have been accepted... This seems to be a tad bit better than quite some of them. However, it looks like there is considerable detail loss (as with some other pictures), and imho input from others is needed, hence I'm bringing this to CR. --GerifalteDelSabana 23:00, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support - Good enough, IMO, and funny! -- Ikan Kekek 07:46, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I dislike the green colour shift at the belly of the bird. Maybe it can be reworked. --Dirtsc 12:56, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done @Dirtsc: I made some adjustment but I don't know how to rework the colour shift on his belly. --Vauxford 21:42, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 07:56, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Dirtsc. I don´t think this is a QI. The shapness isn´t convincing me too.--Milseburg 08:15, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support QI for me--Ermell 07:48, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I am also bothered by the greens and the black feathers are too pale. Besides, the background is ugly. -- Spurzem 20:05, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support QI for me too --Nerve net 08:44, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose - I'm sorry, the objections to the green color shift have persuaded me. Vauxford, I'm not close to an expert on photo editing programs, but among other things, you could try using any such program by playing with the red-green slider. -- Ikan Kekek 11:46, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
    •  Comment After my first review, I tried myself, to get rid of the color shift, but wasn't able to produce a good image. Maybe someone more experienced or using a better software can succeed. ;-) Greetings --Dirtsc 08:12, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Basotxerri 17:53, 17 November 2018 (UTC)