Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 12 2015
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Roadside hawk (Buteo magnirostris) immature, the Pantanal, Brazil --Charlesjsharp 22:35, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. Nice work! --Michael Barera 01:49, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Plumbeous seedeater (Sporophila plumbea) male, the Pantanal, Brazil --Charlesjsharp 22:35, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Michael Barera 01:49, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bonsai in the Jade Buddha Temple in Shanghai --Ermell 21:55, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Perhaps it would be better with a slightly tigher crop (see the little bit of foliage at the extreme right), but I think it is still good enough to be a QI. --Michael Barera 01:49, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination San Martin Monastery, Santiago de Compostela, Spain --Poco a poco 20:45, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:25, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cloister of the Monastery of la Oliva, Carcastillo, Navarre, Spain --Poco a poco 20:45, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:25, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Parador of Alcalá de Henares, Spain --Poco a poco 20:45, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 21:30, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fefiñáns Palace, Cambados, Pontevedra, Spain --Poco a poco 20:45, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:25, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Old city walls, La Coruña, Spain --Poco a poco 20:45, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:25, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Trolleybus ZiU-682G in Yaroslavl --Florstein 19:34, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:05, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Trolleybus TrolZa-5275.07 in Yaroslavl --Florstein 19:34, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:05, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tram KTM-19 at Oktyabrya Avenue in Yaroslavl --Florstein 19:34, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:05, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The beheading of St-Eutropius, St-Eutropius upper basilica, Saintes, Charente-Maritime, France.--Jebulon 16:13, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 17:04, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Plaque with motto "A mon Droit", Saintes, Charente-Maritime, France.--Jebulon 15:47, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:53, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Blessed bishop Pierre-Louis de La Rochefoucauld, victim of the September massacres (1792), stained glass window, 19th-c., upper basilica St-Eutropius, Saintes, Charente-Maritime, France.--Jebulon 15:43, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 17:04, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Roman amphitheatre of Saintes, Charente-Maritime, France.--Jebulon 15:41, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:41, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Vens mountain tour of the Pointe Oilletta in Valle d'Aosta (Italy). Seed pods of alpine flora along mountain path in dense fog at Lac du Joux (1930m).
Famberhorst 15:08, 9 October 2015 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:41, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Nomination Vens mountain tour of the Pointe Oilletta in Valle d'Aosta (Italy). Seed pods of alpine flora along mountain path in dense fog at Lac du Joux (1930m).
-
- Nomination Solitary oak (Quercus). location, Stuttering Bosch in the Lende valley. Province of Friesland in the Netherlands.
Famberhorst 15:08, 9 October 2015 (UTC) - Promotion Not perfect, but good enough. A nice tree.--Jebulon 16:32, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Nomination Solitary oak (Quercus). location, Stuttering Bosch in the Lende valley. Province of Friesland in the Netherlands.
-
- Nomination Hohes Gletscherdach with Groß- and Kleinvenediger in Eastern Tyrol.--Geiserich77 11:53, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:05, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Keeskogel in Eastern Tyrol. --Geiserich77 11:53, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 16:05, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kristallwand in Eastern Tyrol. --Geiserich77 11:53, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 16:05, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hohe Achsel in Eastern Tyrol. --Geiserich77 11:53, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 16:05, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination So called Hohes Gletscherdach in Eastern Tyrol. --Geiserich77 11:53, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 16:05, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Thomisus onustus --Christian Ferrer 11:38, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:52, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Drottningholm Palace, Sweden -- Pudelek 11:20, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Palauenc05 11:47, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Drottningholm Palace, Sweden -- Pudelek 11:20, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Palauenc05 11:47, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Drottningholm Palace, Sweden -- Pudelek 11:20, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Palauenc05 11:47, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Road near Bière, with view of the Jura. By User:KlausFoehl --Pokéfan95 09:43, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:52, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The northern wing of the Przemyśl Castle. Przemyśl, Subcarpathian Voivodeship, Poland. --Halavar 09:39, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:52, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tenement house, 1 Grodzka Street. Przemyśl, Subcarpathian Voivodeship, Poland. --Halavar 09:39, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 13:46, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Memorial in honor of Siberian Deportees. August Krzyżanowski city park. Tomaszów Lubelski, Lublin Voivodeship, Poland. --Halavar 09:39, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 13:46, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Panoramic view of Wenns, Tyrol. --Hubertl 09:02, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 13:44, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Barnes near the Fernsteinkapelle, Nassereith, Tyrol --Hubertl 09:02, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 13:44, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fernsteinkapelle, Nassereith, Tyrol --Hubertl 09:02, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 13:44, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Croatia, Pula, Hercules Gate --Berthold Werner 08:16, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 10:18, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bus in Mexico D. F. --Ralf Roletschek 08:03, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 09:35, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bus in Mexico D. F. --Ralf Roletschek 08:03, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 22:04, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bus in Mexico D. F. --Ralf Roletschek 08:03, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 22:05, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fahrradcorso in Mexico D. F. --Ralf Roletschek 08:03, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 22:08, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fahrradcorso in Mexico D. F. --Ralf Roletschek 08:03, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:14, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Champ de Mars Racecourse in Port Louis, Mauritius --Martin Falbisoner 08:01, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 10:22, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Notre Dame Auxiliatrice at Cap Malheureux, Mauritius --Martin Falbisoner 08:01, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment Tilted CW little bit. --Halavar 09:24, 9 October 2015 (UTC) Comment Halavar: Fixed --Martin Falbisoner 13:15, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
Support Good now. QI for me. --Halavar 18:13, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Blue Penny Museum in Port Louis, Mauritius --Martin Falbisoner 08:01, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 22:11, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Colorful umbrellas at Caudan Waterfront Mall, Port Louis, Mauritius --Martin Falbisoner 08:01, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:21, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Government House in Port Louis, Mauritius --Martin Falbisoner 08:01, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 10:22, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Our Lady of Sorrows Church in Nowa Ruda --Jacek Halicki 07:59, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 08:03, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church of the Exaltation of the Holy Cross in Kłodzko --Jacek Halicki 07:59, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 08:03, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Grunwaldzka Street in Kłodzko --Jacek Halicki 07:59, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 08:03, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Witosa Street in Kłodzko --Jacek Halicki 07:59, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 08:03, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 6-8 Braci Gierymskich Street in Kłodzko --Jacek Halicki 07:59, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 08:03, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mushrooms on dead wood. Location, Stuttering Bosch in the lime valley. Friesland province.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:30, 9 October 2015 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:41, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Nomination Mushrooms on dead wood. Location, Stuttering Bosch in the lime valley. Friesland province.
-
- Nomination Rental and commercial building, Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, Germany --XRay 04:55, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:43, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Catholic Church “To the Holy Guardian Angels”, Juist, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 04:55, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:32, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Manor Ruhr, Bösensell, Senden, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:55, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Withdrawn I withdraw my nomination Sorry, too much noise. The image is not QI.--XRay 08:21, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Manor Klein-Schonebeck, Appelhülsen, Nottuln, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:55, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:43, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Unique by tides ever-changing marsh area. Location, Noarderleech Profince Friesland in the Netherlands.
Famberhorst 04:33, 9 October 2015 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 07:56, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Nomination Unique by tides ever-changing marsh area. Location, Noarderleech Profince Friesland in the Netherlands.
-
- Nomination Lago Fallère, Valle d'Aosta (2415m).
Famberhorst 04:33, 9 October 2015 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:43, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Nomination Lago Fallère, Valle d'Aosta (2415m).
-
- Nomination Overgrown fairly wet habitat. location, Stuttering Bosch in the Lende valley. Province of Friesland in the Netherlands.
Famberhorst 04:33, 9 October 2015 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:03, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Nomination Overgrown fairly wet habitat. location, Stuttering Bosch in the Lende valley. Province of Friesland in the Netherlands.
-
- Nomination Wesseling, Germany: Marienfels, built in 1932, serves as ferry across the Rhine between Wesseling and Lülsdorf --Cccefalon 03:46, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. Nice photo! --Michael Barera 01:53, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Brühl, Germany: Sculptures on the roof of Schloss Augustusburg --Cccefalon 03:46, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:37, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Arcade yard with fountain at the Benedictine Abbey, Millstatt, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:36, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ajepbah 05:04, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fountain at the arcade yard at the Benedictine Abbey, Millstatt, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:36, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. The drainpipe at the right is a little bit disturbing. --XRay 06:09, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Northeastern view at the portal to the Benedictine yard of the Benedictine Abbey, Millstatt, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:36, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 07:57, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Southwestern view at the arcades of the Benedictine yard of the Benedictine Abbey, Millstatt, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:36, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:34, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Big Bell from Patan Durbar Square --Ksssshl by बिप्लब आनन्द 14:25, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Decline Underexposed --Cccefalon 04:02, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Aantarastriya Sammelan Kendra evening lightwork --Prabina Karki by बिप्लब आनन्द 14:25, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Decline Perspective not done, not sharp, foreground too busy. --Cccefalon 04:03, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Evening Aarati at Pashupatinath Temple --Girisumit1990 by बिप्लब आनन्द 14:25, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Decline Not sharp, noisy and artefacts. --Cccefalon 04:04, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Interior of the Central Station of Antwerp, Belgium -- Alvesgaspar 21:58, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 16:09, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Roman mascaron, Pius Clementi Museum (Vatican) -- Alvesgaspar 21:55, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:52, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Blauflügelige Sandschrecke - Sphingonotus caerulans --Hockei 17:53, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
- Withdrawn
-
- Nomination Blauflügelige Sandschrecke - Sphingonotus caerulans --Hockei 17:53, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
- Withdrawn
-
- Nomination Edzná, Campeche, Provinz Campeche, Mexico - archäologische Stätte der Maya --Ralf Roletschek 17:47, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 08:01, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Abretterin Eastern Tyrol. --Geiserich77 14:09, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 22:25, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pile Gate with statue of Saint Blaise. Dubrovnik, Dubrovnik-Neretva County, Croatia. --Halavar 14:03, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:52, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saint Teresa Carmelite church. Przemyśl, Subcarpathian Voivodeship, Poland. --Halavar 14:03, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:52, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ascending the Duquesne Incline on Mount Washington. --Dllu 19:49, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. And nice perspective! --Michael Barera 02:01, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mountain hike from Homene Dessus to Vens Valle d'Aosta. View craggy rocks erosion forms.
Famberhorst 15:11, 7 October 2015 (UTC) - Promotion Not the best lighting, but great clarity and, in my opinion, enough overall quality to be a QI. --Michael Barera 02:01, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
- Nomination Mountain hike from Homene Dessus to Vens Valle d'Aosta. View craggy rocks erosion forms.
-
- Nomination Croatia, Pula, Amphitheatre, museum in the catacombs, amphora --Berthold Werner 09:16, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Support QI --Rjcastillo 15:23, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mexico D. F. - Policeman filming the bus passengers --Ralf Roletschek 07:43, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Interesting, but unsharp. --C messier 13:48, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Angel de la Independencia, Mexico D. F. --Ralf Roletschek 07:43, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Support OK for me. --C messier 13:48, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Side entrance of Agios Minas cathedral, Heraklion. --C messier 07:22, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
Too much chroma noise Poco a poco 18:17, 6 October 2015 (UTC) Done --C messier 05:35, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
Better, but still to high IMHO Poco a poco 22:07, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination I'm sure if I can denoise more without losing too many details. --C messier 13:37, 9 October 2015 (UTC) - Withdrawn
- Nomination Side entrance of Agios Minas cathedral, Heraklion. --C messier 07:22, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
-
framing corrected--Jebulon 07:51, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
You also increased contrast, I think it works very well, merci. --Kadellar 09:06, 9 October 2015 (UTC) -
- Nomination Haus Sythen, Haltern am See, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:40, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
- Withdrawn I withdraw my nomination Sorry, it's not QI. --XRay 08:44, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lake in the Fan Mountains. Tajikistan. --Шухрат Саъдиев 01:55, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Overexposure in the sky and rocks, jpeg artifacts, tilted. --C messier 13:35, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Church in Passau, Germany. --Geiserich77 14:36, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
- Review Sky is very noisy. Can be salvaged by reprocessing from RAW. --Cccefalon 18:57, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Residence and company building in Passau, Germany. --Geiserich77 14:36, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Residence and company building in Passau, Germany. --Geiserich77 14:36, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Santa Sofia church in Venice. --Moroder 13:12, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Great Skua (Stercorarius skua) on Handa Island (Scotland) --Elrond 11:10, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Saint-Louis Church. Sète, Hérault, France. --Christian Ferrer 06:39, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
- Decline Good quality. Very nice composition but unfortunately too noisy due to hi ISO, sorry --Moroder 15:23, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Detail of "Busc di Salvans" cave in Bula Gröden - South Tyrol --Moroder 11:04, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion I love this photograph -- forgiving the few blown out highlights. -- RaboKarbakian 21:37, 9 October 2015 (UTC) Comment Thanks for your kind appreciation but there is only one, imo absolutely negligible, blownout spot on a rock --Moroder 22:05, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Nymphaea 'René Gérard' (water-lilie) in jardin botanique de Lyon, France. --Medium69 15:32, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Photo is sharp, encyclopedic, etc. I don't like the composition and I am not fond of 'varieties/cultivars', but that is personal and not a QI problem, unfortunately. -- RaboKarbakian 05:25, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Main statue of Kankalni Temple. Id NP-SAP-02 --Bijay chaurasia 12:08, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
- Decline Insufficient quality. Mostly out of focus, sorry --Moroder 14:39, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Reservoir in Chocieszów --Jacek Halicki 08:12, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion
Comment Distorted. Please correct it, you have enough experience and must see it by yourself. --Hockei 18:26, 8 October 2015 (UTC) Done --Jacek Halicki 09:21, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
Support Good now. --Hockei 12:06, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rock in Ein Khadra Desert Oasis, Nuweibaa, South Sinai, Egypt.--لا روسا 20:03, 30 September 2015 (UTC)* Comment almost the same picture as the next, but with different White balance. Which one is correct? --Hubertl 08:08, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
@Hubertl: Actually, i used two modes when i have taken the four photos, automatic mode for the first one that you promoted before and for this one also, and program mode for the other one.--لا روسا 11:54, 8 October 2015 (UTC) - Promotion I think this one is ok --Hubertl 07:51, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Nomination Rock in Ein Khadra Desert Oasis, Nuweibaa, South Sinai, Egypt.--لا روسا 20:03, 30 September 2015 (UTC)* Comment almost the same picture as the next, but with different White balance. Which one is correct? --Hubertl 08:08, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rock in Ein Khadra Desert Oasis, Nuweibaa, South Sinai, Egypt.--لا روسا 20:03, 30 September 2015 (UTC)* Comment almost the same picture as the previous one, but with different White balance. Which one is correct? --Hubertl 08:08, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
@Hubertl: Actually, i used two modes when i have taken the four photos, automatic mode for the first one that you promoted before and program mode for this one.--لا روسا 11:54, 8 October 2015 (UTC) - Decline I must decline it, I believe the WB ist completely wrong. --Hubertl 07:51, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Nomination Rock in Ein Khadra Desert Oasis, Nuweibaa, South Sinai, Egypt.--لا روسا 20:03, 30 September 2015 (UTC)* Comment almost the same picture as the previous one, but with different White balance. Which one is correct? --Hubertl 08:08, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rock in Ein Khadra Desert Oasis, Nuweibaa, South Sinai, Egypt.--لا روسا 20:03, 30 September 2015 (UTC)* Comment almost the same picture as the two before, but with different White balance. Which one is correct? --Hubertl 08:09, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
@Hubertl: Actually, i used two modes when i have taken the four photos, automatic mode for the first one that you promoted before and for this one also, and program mode for the other one.--لا روسا 11:54, 8 October 2015 (UTC) - Promotion This one is ok for me to, even when weak. --Hubertl 07:51, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Nomination Rock in Ein Khadra Desert Oasis, Nuweibaa, South Sinai, Egypt.--لا روسا 20:03, 30 September 2015 (UTC)* Comment almost the same picture as the two before, but with different White balance. Which one is correct? --Hubertl 08:09, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Hamburg-Winterhude, office building Überseering 24 in the commercial area City Nord --Dirtsc 06:17, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
- Review Comment I brightened this one a bit, please judge, if this version is better. --Dirtsc 20:48, 1 October 2015 (UTC) Sorry for late response. New version is better. Unfortunately, the noisy and blurry foreground is still a problem. I will be happy for a second opinion. --ArildV 07:30, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
Consensual review[edit]
File:2015.07.11.-09-Mulde Eilenburg--Blaufluegelige Sandschrecke.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Blauflügelige Sandschrecke - Sphingonotus caerulans --Hockei 14:32, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Withdrawn
- Oppose Unsharp, sorry.--Jebulon 16:31, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Support Head appears sufficiently sharp, imo --Martin Falbisoner 17:04, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Support Good enough IMO Poco a poco 15:12, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Obviously out of focus. Alvesgaspar 21:49, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Info I'll discontinue my activities in QIC, I'm out. Thanks to the supporters. --Hockei 05:54, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
- Info You have got no reason to be upset. If a picture is not sharp it isn´t. You should try to learn from that and not take the critics personally.You´re very busy and your work is worth to be continued.--Ermell 08:54, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days --Hubertl 06:10, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
File:2015.07.07.-25-Mulde Eilenburg--Schwarze Heidelibelle-Weibchen.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Schwarze Heidelibelle - Sympetrum danae, Weibchen (female) New version. --Hockei 15:13, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
- Withdrawn
- Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:21, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
- OpposeHead not sharp enough and body all out of focus. Charlesjsharp 13:31, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
- ... body all out of focus ... What a nonsense. --Hockei 10:21, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
- Support Impossible to get the whole thing sharp without stacking. QI for me.--Ermell 12:49, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose One has to choose on what to focus, and the head and eyes are the first thing. Alvesgaspar 17:26, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
- It is. As far I can remember you haven't promoted any picture of me, have you? Only declined. Sometimes I wonder whether it's a personal thing. Maybe I'm wrong but I'm sceptical. --Hockei 18:48, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
- It is certainly not a personal thing and the reason invoked for opposing is clear and objective. Alvesgaspar 19:55, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
- This is not what I mean. You only decline my pictures where ever you can but never support although there is much opportunity enough. That's it. --Hockei 12:17, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Does it really matter and is it a good policy, to ask for mutually tit for tat? Some people do it, some not. Some refuse to give a positive vote in contrary of another positive vote. I think, that is perfectly ok. We are not just here to get a positive QI-counting. --Hubertl 13:22, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Come on. Think twice before writing. In my eyes it's a tactic. CR don't work perfect. Once declined you can hope other people won't make a review or think the same what is suggested. Anyway, I won't let me forbid to say what I'm afraid. Maybe I shouldn’t waste my time in QIC anymore. In pictures from other people is accepted strong noise and artefacts and here there is suggested the face would be not in focus. And this is just one example. --Hockei 14:11, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- » Please try to be rational, Hockei. What kind of tatic and with what purpose? I seldom come here now, and when I come, I prefer to assess the images in CR, the ones other editors have already evaluated. Yes, it is true that I oppose a lot but that has always been my normal way. For me, QIC has always been a learning place, not a vanity fair. Alvesgaspar 23:54, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
- It is. As far I can remember you haven't promoted any picture of me, have you? Only declined. Sometimes I wonder whether it's a personal thing. Maybe I'm wrong but I'm sceptical. --Hockei 18:48, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
- Info I'll discontinue my activities in QIC, I'm out. Thanks to the supporters. --Hockei (talk) 05:59, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → More votes? --Hubertl 07:54, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
File:Taricha_torosa,_Napa_County,_CA.jpg[edit]
- Nomination A California newt (Taricha torosa) from Napa County, CA. --Connorlong90 08:30, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:56, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose I disagree: Oversharpened with jpeg artefacts. --Cccefalon 15:25, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
OpposeFull of artefacts. --Hockei 15:52, 5 October 2015 (UTC)- Support Depth of field does a great job of highlighting the subject of the image (the newt's face). Minimal artifacting does not detract from the high quality framing, focus, and overall image. --Natejunk2004 03:16, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
- Interesting "expert vote" from someone who made one contribution to WikiCommons so far. But has already the experience to operate the QICtotal. It's fishy .... --Cccefalon 03:57, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
- Please critique the quality of my picture without being rude to the people who disagree with you. The guidelines page for QI specifically mentions the need to be polite in this process. It also states that users can disagree on what is technically acceptable. Natejunk2004's opinion is not less valid because he is less active on the site. --Connorlong90 01:34, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Only a very small part of the monster is in focus.--Jebulon 20:27, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
- Jebulon, thank you for your comment. My understanding was that shallow depth of field is allowed if it serves a purpose. In this instance, my intent was a closeup of the newt's head and upper body. The example picture of a cat is similarly framed.-- Connorlong90 00:28, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
- Connorlong90, sorry for oppose. I understand the purpose and I see your point, but it just does not work for me. Let's see what others say...--Jebulon 09:57, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
- Jebulon, thank you for your comment. My understanding was that shallow depth of field is allowed if it serves a purpose. In this instance, my intent was a closeup of the newt's head and upper body. The example picture of a cat is similarly framed.-- Connorlong90 00:28, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
- Support OK for me. -- Der Wolf im Wald 18:19, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
- Weak support ok for me too. --Iifar 06:04, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- more or less weak Support. Still acceptable -- DerFussi 14:16, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Support the head is sharp. OK --Elrond 17:06, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Doesn't work for me, the front legs and hands should be focused as well, I wonder why a F/22 did not solve the problem! Alvesgaspar 21:40, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Info I've revoked my vote because I'll discontinue my activities in QIC. --Hockei 06:15, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
Total: 6 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Promoted --Hubertl 20:04, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
File:1144 230, Wien Praterstern.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Original (Deutsch): 1144 230 vor einem Doppelstockzug fährt als R 2325 Richtung Payerbach-Reichenau am Bahnsteig 2 des Bahnhofs Wien Praterstern ein
Google Translate (English): 1144 230 in front of a double-decker continues as R 2325 towards Payerbach-Reichenau on the platform 2 of the station Vienna Praterstern is a --Pokéfan95 22:52, 2 October 2015 (UTC) - Decline
- Oppose Only the first wagon is in focus what I think the whole train should be. --Ermell 08:53, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
- Support I disagree, how will you get a complete train full in focus, when the engine is that close? Focus bracketing? --Hubertl 16:03, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
- Support This was taken at f/7.1. Depth of field can be improved by stopping down to f/11 or beyond (it's a full frame camera) as lighting conditions are very bright but right now it seems OK to me. Dllu 23:36, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
- Support -- Spurzem 21:39, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Ralf Roleček 00:35, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose For me it is not QI. DOF problem. Not even the whole front of the loco is in focus. Also the crop left end left down is too tight. --Hockei 15:27, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose I'd expect best sharpness at the head of the train. -- Smial 15:28, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Foreground is unfocused and crop is too tight on the left (let the poor thing breathe!) -- Alvesgaspar 17:31, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Agree with opposers.--Jebulon 22:13, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Agree with Alvesgaspar here Poco a poco 07:50, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 6 oppose → Declined --Poco a poco 07:50, 11 October 2015 (UTC)