Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives September 29 2022

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Yellowstone_National_Park_(WY,_USA),_Upper_Geyser_Basin,_Bison_--_2022_--_135402.jpg[edit]

File:Douiret001.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Village Berbère de Douiret (Sud de la Tunisie). --El Golli Mohamed 16:47, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 22:08, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree, it's unsharp, and noisy. --Sebring12Hrs 09:35, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose +1. --Peulle 09:58, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 12:56, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

File:Zarzis_plage.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Maisons à Zarzis--El Golli Mohamed 16:47, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 22:08, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Because unsharp and JPEG artifacts. --Sebring12Hrs 09:40, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Visible artifacts --LexKurochkin 13:18, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 12:56, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

File:RA-73215_Airbus_A319-100_Rossiya_-_Russian_Airlines_VKO_2022-08-03_2030.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination RA-73215 Airbus A319-100 Rossiya - Russian Airlines VKO --Mike1979 Russia 06:09, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Question The sky looks a bit overexposed could you fix that and/or crop that out? --Ermell 21:15, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
    • ✓ Done Darkened the sky and croped it --Mike1979 Russia 17:48, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
      •  Support Good quality. --Ermell 15:14, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. Looks too greenish to me. Sorry. --Milseburg 11:44, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose With Milesburg. --Augustgeyler 12:39, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
    • ✓ Done I decreased green and increased blue. Is it OK now? --Mike1979 Russia 14:29, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
      •  Comment Still looks rather greenish. I would suggest to use tarmac as a color-neutral model. Try several spots near the Rossia airplane, but not the white line as it possibly reflects blue sky to some extent. --LexKurochkin 18:29, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
        • ✓ Done Another variant. --Mike1979 Russia 09:00, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
          •  Support OK for me. --LexKurochkin 18:41, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
            • Thank you for detailed comment. I'm color blind. It's very dificult for me to correct WB and colors. --Mike1979 Russia 08:35, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
  •  Comment Sky still looks a bit off to me, probably still a bit on the green side. I definitely understand why it's hard for you to judge that. -- Ikan Kekek 22:02, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose WB is off Poco a poco 10:58, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
    • Another variant. --Mike1979 Russia 13:30, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
      • Not yet there...Poco a poco 07:43, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
        • Could you clarify I should make the photo colder-warmer, greener-purple. Statement of fact does not help me because the reason indicated above. Thank you. --Mike1979 Russia 08:37, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
          • It feels like to much blue and green hue Poco a poco 20:26, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
            • I reduced blue and green by two steps. What about now? --Mike1979 Russia 16:16, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
              • Not yet there, I applied in Lr the following changes: +28 temp (warmer) and +28 tint (purplish) in addition I applied to the sky -9 temp (colder) and +33 tint (purplish). The result is here. Poco a poco 18:33, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 12:55, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

File:Bad_Dürkheim_Kirchgasse_16_001_2021_10_10.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Nave and apse of the protestant palace church in Bad Dürkheim
    --F. Riedelio 14:57, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 15:01, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Not sharp enough, quite dark and noisy --Uoaei1 19:14, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
    • ✓ New version Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 07:01, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support I like both versions, the slightly darker one possibly even better. But anyway, even if the image sharpness and noise are not perfect, the quality is still good enough for a decent A4-size print. --Smial 08:06, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Not sharp enough. --Augustgeyler 12:37, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support Per Smial --Ermell 08:24, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Smial, I definitely understand your position on this, but I would call the quality mediocre, not really good, so I'm voting against it. -- Ikan Kekek 22:06, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
     Comment The picture is definitely borderline. One person then decides this way, the second makes a different choice. As long as a sensible reason is given, I can live with it. --Smial 13:28, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality colours. Nacaru 20:25, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support OK 4 me. --Palauenc05 12:22, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 12:55, 28 September 2022 (UTC)