Commons:Valued image candidates/Apollinariskirche Remagen - Krypta (2008-07-21).JPG

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Apollinariskirche Remagen - Krypta (2008-07-21).JPG

promoted
Image
Nominated by Spurzem (talk) on 2022-04-16 10:15 (UTC)
Scope Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Apollinariskirche (Remagen): crypt with sarcophagus from the 14th century
Used in Global usage
Review
(criteria)
  •  Support Best in scope and used. --Tagooty (talk) 13:46, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Scope is too wordy and descriptive to meet the COM:VIS requirement that at VI nomination represent “a generic field or category within which your image is the most valuable example”. The image does not show the interior nave of the church; it shows the crypt. And there are several religious elements in this crypt of which the sarcophagus is just one, and not particularly well seen. A scope closer to "Crypt of Apollinariskirche (Remagen)" might work here for a VI nomination. --GRDN711 (talk) 05:50, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support Scope OK for me. --Palauenc05 (talk) 10:09, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • @GRDN711: Your hair-splitting and vicious criticism disgusts me. You act like you're the boss here and the only one who knows what's right and what's wrong. -- Spurzem (talk) 13:49, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Spurzem – please assume good faith. I would like to support a VI rating for your image nomination. It just requires a small modification of the scope so that it is in keeping with COM:VIS requirements that a scope be not overly descriptive but "defines a generic field or category within which your image is the most valuable example.”
As listed above, the scope of your image is not the interior nave of the church; it does not really show the sarcophagus well; it cannot represent the entire 14th century.
The image is of good quality. The scope link is fine. My scope suggestion was "Crypt of Apollinariskirche (Remagen)" but if you have something else that is short, sweet and represents a generic field or category, that might work too. --GRDN711 (talk) 20:24, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Result: 2 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 12:28, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Valued_image_candidates/Apollinariskirche_Remagen_-_Krypta_(2008-07-21).JPG&oldid=650975097"