Commons:Valued image candidates/Juvenile Male Ruby-throated Hummingbird.jpg

Juvenile Male Ruby-throated Hummingbird.jpg

promoted

Image
Nominated by	Pslawinski (talk) on 2013-10-24 11:05 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Archilochus colubris (Ruby-throated Hummingbird), juvenile male
Used in	Global usage Commons:Quality images/Subject/Animals/Birds Commons:Quality images/Subject/Animals/Birds/Sample Commons:Quality images/Subject/Animals/Sample Archilochus_colubris https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruby-throated_Hummingbird
Review (criteria)	Comment Can you explain why the juvenile form is different from the adult form of the female? --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:20, 24 October 2013 (UTC)  Support The dark-speckled throat appears to separate the juvenile male (this image) from the adult female (according to Sibley).--Walter Siegmund (talk) 00:03, 26 October 2013 (UTC)  Comment Perfect for the explanation. But this picture has been honored in VI as female. We must first make clear this promotion before to represent. I recommend prende notice of User: Myrabella. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 26 October 2013 (UTC)  Question Are you sure it is a jevenile male now? Some articles in Wikipedia to be corrected then, where that image was inserted assuming it depicted a female: example on fr:WP. --Myrabella (talk) 07:50, 26 October 2013 (UTC)  Comment I've struck my vote and changed status back to nominated while this is being discussed. Archaeodontosaurus, this image is no longer "honored in VI as female".[1] That action may be out of process and require correction. Myrabella, I'm not sure the new identification is correct. I'm not an expert on birds. I'll ask User:MPF. --Walter Siegmund (talk) 19:05, 27 October 2013 (UTC)  Comment I concur with this being a juvenile male; females have a clearer white throat without such obvious dark spots (if ant at all). - MPF (talk) 19:23, 27 October 2013 (UTC)  Comment I know the competence of User:MPF , and made ​​a full confidence. You must remove the old label VI to vote. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:38, 28 October 2013 (UTC)  Done Old VI seal removed from the file description; previous VIC page treated; birds' VI gallery cleaned. --Myrabella (talk) 08:57, 28 October 2013 (UTC)  Support Everything is perfect --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:51, 28 October 2013 (UTC) Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 30 October 2013 (UTC)