User talk:Wsiegmund

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
- Welcome to my talk page -
So that it is easier to follow a discussion, I will reply to messages left here on this page. If I have posted on your talk page,
I will be watching so you can reply there if you wish.


This talk page is automatically archived by MiszaBot. Any sections older than 7 days are automatically archived. Please see the links listed below.


Also see my enwiki talk page.

Archives[edit]

Mar2007 Apr2007 May2007 Jun2007 Jul2007 Aug2007 Sep2007 Oct2007 Nov2007 Dec2007 Jan2008 Mar2008 Apr2008 May2008 Jun2008 Jul2008 Aug2008 Oct2008 2008/9 2008/10 2008/11 2008/12 2009/2 2009/3 2009/4 2009/5 2009/6 2009/7 2009/8 2009/9 2009/10 2009/11 2009/12 2010/1 2010/2 2010/3 2010/4 2010/5 2010/6 2010/7 2010/8 2010/9 2010/10 2010/11 2010/12 2011/1 2011/2 2011/3 2011/4 2011/5 2011/6 2011/7 2011/8 2011/9 2011/10 2011/11 2011/12 2012/1 2012/2 2012/3 2012/4 2012/5 2012/6 2012/8 2012/9 2012/10 2012/11 2012/12 2013/1 2013/2 2013/3 2013/4 2013/5 2013/6 2013/7 2013/8 2013/9 2013/10 2013/11 2013/12 2014/1 2014/2 2014/3 2014/4 2014/5 2014/6 2014/7 2014/8 2014/9 2014/10 2014/11 2014/12

Reply:Redirection of gallery pages[edit]

Helli.Sometimes categories contain more images than gallery pages.So I make gallery pages redirects.thanks --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 18:05, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

That isn't a valid reason. A gallery page should include the best images chosen to illustrate the various aspects of the subject. Many don't reach that goal, but please work to improve them, or work on something else.
Please read the pages that I linked to on your talk page. Also, I looked at some of the deletion requests posted there. Please review COM:SCOPE. Most of the images, e.g., File:أوراق نبات ميتة 16.jpg, that I saw are not "realistically useful for an educational purpose." You may use GLAMorous to see files that others find useful.[1] --Walter Siegmund (talk) 18:24, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Viola flettii 4799.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Viola flettii 4799.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Lupinus lepidus 4695.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lupinus lepidus 4695.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Skagit River 8685.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skagit River 8685.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Skagit River 8667s.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skagit River 8667s.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Smelowskia americana 4859.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Smelowskia americana 4859.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:Jesucristo-CapillaDivinoRostro-MDP1.jpg[edit]

Hi, how are you? I remove the disturbing objects in the background, see it please. Another day I´ll renominate it for QIC. Thank you for your review! Ezarateesteban 15:36, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Ezarate; Thank you for your greeting. As I said in my review, "my eye is drawn to the green of the bulletin board on the right." Removing the items on the bulletin board helps, but I am distracted by the green. Other reviewers may not feel the same. I'm curious to see their thoughts. Best wishes, Walter Siegmund (talk) 17:17, 25 January 2015 (UTC)