Helli.Sometimes categories contain more images than gallery pages.So I make gallery pages redirects.thanks --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 18:05, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
That isn't a valid reason. A gallery page should include the best images chosen to illustrate the various aspects of the subject. Many don't reach that goal, but please work to improve them, or work on something else.
Please read the pages that I linked to on your talk page. Also, I looked at some of the deletion requests posted there. Please review COM:SCOPE. Most of the images, e.g., File:أوراق نبات ميتة 16.jpg, that I saw are not "realistically useful for an educational purpose." You may use GLAMorous to see files that others find useful. --Walter Siegmund(talk) 18:24, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
Comment I like it. But it must be denoised and sharpened. --Hockei 19:14, 11 January 2015 (UTC) Done Please have another look. --Wsiegmund 01:40, 18 January 2015 (UTC) Support QI for me. --Bff 08:46, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi, how are you? I remove the disturbing objects in the background, see it please. Another day I´ll renominate it for QIC. Thank you for your review! Ezarateesteban 15:36, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
Ezarate; Thank you for your greeting. As I said in my review, "my eye is drawn to the green of the bulletin board on the right." Removing the items on the bulletin board helps, but I am distracted by the green. Other reviewers may not feel the same. I'm curious to see their thoughts. Best wishes, Walter Siegmund(talk) 17:17, 25 January 2015 (UTC)