Commons:Valued image candidates/Opel Blitz, Feuerwehr, 1952-60 (2012-06-10 Sp).JPG

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Opel Blitz, Feuerwehr, 1952-60 (2012-06-10 Sp).JPG

promoted
Image
Nominated by Spurzem (talk) on 2022-04-27 18:59 (UTC)
Scope Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Opel Blitz fire engine (built from 1952 to 1960) in motion, front and left side
Used in Global usage
Review
(criteria)

 Oppose Overall a good image and valuable but per COM:VIS, "in motion" is overly descriptive and is not relevant as a sub-scope. The rest of the scope, making the claim that this is the most valued image of this model of Opel Blitz fire engine model, built from 1952 to 1960, with a further front and left side sub-scope, is fine. --GRDN711 (talk) 14:47, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Support I have given some further thought to this and will support the nomination with the current scope given that the "view" and being "in motion" correspond to elements “visible in the nominated image” per COM:VIS.
I still think having an automotive scope of model and year with two further sub-scopes is one too many. Further, that overly descriptive scopes or layered sub-scopes do not add value to the nomination, nor do they guarantee longevity of the VI rating in the future. --GRDN711 (talk) 17:51, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@GRDN711: That's enough! I'm sick of your harassment! I believed that a harmonious coexistence would gradually develop. But that was a mistake.-- Spurzem (talk) 06:30, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Spurzem While this one IMHO, was close to the edge of overly descriptive to give me pause, your recent choice of VI scopes has improved considerably. --GRDN711 (talk) 18:15, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@GRDN711: Thank you, teacher. Like I said above, it is enough. But nevertheless I have included an image again, although it would probably make more sense to save myself the hassle in the short lifetime I have ahead of me. -- Spurzem (talk) 18:42, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Result: 3 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
[reply]