Info No geocode because there is no relation of the drawing to a specific location on earth. Link of scope is not identic to scope because I don't know a gallery or category on commons that is about the principle of photograms. -- Dr. Schorsch (talk) 20:19, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'd suggest a small amendment in the description: adding that the result depends also on the transparency of the objects (not only on their distance to the film). Semi-transparent objects give grey tones. --Myrabella (talk) 15:50, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Thank you, that is a good suggestion. I wanted to keep the image description simple, because the details are explained in the related articles. But this information can be added easily. -- Dr. Schorsch (talk) 15:57, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Scope changed from Principle of a photogram's development to Principle of a photogram's exposure Myrabella suggested a change of the scope to be clearer. Development is not only the process of the creation of something but also the chemical film development. --Dr. Schorsch (talk) 15:00, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".
Comment Thanks for your support! "Principle of the photogram" sounds a bit missleading to me, like the principle of a specific photogram. Maybe a native speaker can give us a hint on this. -- Dr. Schorsch (talk) 19:38, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I am a native English speaker and can easily be misunderstood () so may not be the best person to comment. However "Principle of a photogram's exposure" seems ok to me but I do think "Principle of the photogram" is both simple and effective. I have also amended the English in the notes slightly. I hope that helps, regards --Herbytalk thyme11:13, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Scope changed from Principle of a photogram's exposure to Principle of the photogram Thanks for your comments! I think this is a good solution for the scope. I would kindly ask Myrabella to confirm her vote after this scope change. -- Dr. Schorsch (talk) 11:38, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".
