Oppose I think the scope is too wide. In order for it to match your reasoning, "(vew from church tower)" should be added. You can also choose a different wording, just make sure it's not too general. --Peulle (talk) 12:36, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This is the only image we have giving a general overview of the building from its main façade, so I think the broad scope is perfectly fine here. Remember that scopes are supposed to represent what people might be looking for when searching for an image (and not to be a description of the images content) – I think if someone wants to find an image to put at the top of a wikipedia article about the stadium, this is exactly what they would want to get. However, it certainly wouldn't hurt to make the scope a bit more specific. --El Grafo (talk) 15:09, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment You are of course aware, then, that if any new photo of the general stadium arrives on Commons, you'll have competition for the VI and this one may easily be delisted?--Peulle (talk) 14:12, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
CommentEl Grafo is right. In the case of a single image the scope can be quite wide. But we can hope that we will have other images of this building and to avoid problems a more precise sope would be desirable. The orientation of the view should suffice. Personally I regret the tilt which is disagreeable and which would be easy to correct. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:22, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Or {{c|Stadion am Zoo}} - view from Hauptkirche Sonnborn spire, as proposed by Peulle above. The trick is trying to keep it as short and broad as possible but as precise as necessary. --El Grafo (talk) 09:41, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".
