There is a general gallery for Prince Eugene of Savoy, I think there is no need for a special one for this statue, which has already his own category. Best in scope IMO. Please notice that the pedestal was made by Eduard van der Nüll, and is therefore out of scope. -- Jebulon (talk)
That's why I explained that the scope is only for the statue alone, made by Fernkorn. The rest of the monument is by other artists, therefore out of scope.--Jebulon (talk) 21:48, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, the photo shows only the statue and can be candidate in the area of section „Works of Art“ but then I think the scope should be rewritten. „Prince Eugene of Savoy statue by Anton Dominik Fernkorn“. The year and the place should be added only if there are more than one Prince Eugene statue by Fernkorn.--MrPanyGoff 15:25, 26 February 2012 (UTC) The confusion is often happen here because the words monument and statue are wrongly mixed in the VI galleries. The monuments and plaques should be in section places.--MrPanyGoff15:32, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I made a mistake in the name ("Helderplatz" for "Heldenplatz") and I asked for a rename. But now, I don't know how to correct the review page...--Jebulon (talk) 16:35, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I suggest to leave the „subpage=“ parameter with the old name and waiting to see if the bot will be ok with this. I'm going to change it back. --MrPanyGoff19:40, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
