Comment A very good picture, but I suggest that you add "{{Listed building England |1=1343264}}" to the description. I know that this is on the category page, but IMO there is no harm in adding it to the image description. Martinvl (talk) 20:35, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Interesting point, but that would add the image to Category:Listed buildings in England with known IDs when it's already there by virtue of the category. You'll see that the category contains over 76,000 images, and I don't know how much duplication there is, but I tend to avoid redundancy wherever possible, because that IS the function and purpose of categories. Rodhullandemu (talk) 20:53, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Info@Rodhullandemu: In general, I agree with you regarding duplication of data, but when I checked the instrucions on categories and on descriptions, I saw that the instruction for categories was to "explain... what should be in the category, if the title is not clear or unambiguous enough on its own" and for descriptions to "provide information to support all subject categories of the file". This tells me that the information in the Category file was over and above what was required while in your case the description field fell short of the requirements. Martinvl (talk) 13:58, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
