File:ANALYSIS OF O-5 PROMOTION AND RETENTION FOR NAVAL URL OFFICERS (IA analysisofopromo1094564906).pdf
Original file (1,275 × 1,650 pixels, file size: 3.17 MB, MIME type: application/pdf, 128 pages)
Captions
Summary
[edit]ANALYSIS OF O-5 PROMOTION AND RETENTION FOR NAVAL URL OFFICERS ( ) | ||
---|---|---|
Author |
|
|
Title |
ANALYSIS OF O-5 PROMOTION AND RETENTION FOR NAVAL URL OFFICERS |
|
Publisher |
Monterey, CA; Naval Postgraduate School |
|
Description |
The U.S. Navy is currently considering a transformation of its personnel performance evaluation system to ensure retention and promotion processes that are less subjective and contribute to a more efficient personnel management system. In this thesis, using an integrated quantitative and qualitative approach, we examine the process and criteria used by the U.S. Navy to select officers from the unrestricted line (URL) for O-5 promotion. We find that the Navy lags in using personality traits and measures of emotional intelligence metrics in its leadership selection and promotion processes, metrics that are considered increasingly important in selecting leaders in the civilian sector. We use historical personnel records to estimate predictive O-5 promotion models in the URL community. Officers’ educational background is the closest measure we have from the existing Navy personnel data when trying to distinguish between officers more likely to exhibit hard skills (associated with technical degrees) versus soft skills (associated with non-technical degrees). We find that officers with technical degrees promote to the O-5 rank at similar rates with officers with either a mix of technical and non-technical degrees or those with exclusive non-technical degrees. We recommend that the Navy start collecting measures of personality traits and emotional intelligence to use in more efficient, less subjective personnel selection and promotion processes. Subjects: O-5 promotion; selection; URL; Navy retention; Promotion; selection criteria; promotion board; selection process; civilian industry selection |
|
Language | English | |
Publication date | March 2020 | |
Current location |
IA Collections: navalpostgraduateschoollibrary; fedlink |
|
Accession number |
analysisofopromo1094564906 |
|
Source | ||
Permission (Reusing this file) |
This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. Copyright protection is not available for this work in the United States. |
Licensing
[edit]Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse |
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work prepared by an officer or employee of the United States Government as part of that person’s official duties under the terms of Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 105 of the US Code.
Note: This only applies to original works of the Federal Government and not to the work of any individual U.S. state, territory, commonwealth, county, municipality, or any other subdivision. This template also does not apply to postage stamp designs published by the United States Postal Service since 1978. (See § 313.6(C)(1) of Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices). It also does not apply to certain US coins; see The US Mint Terms of Use.
|
||
This file has been identified as being free of known restrictions under copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights. |
https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/PDMCreative Commons Public Domain Mark 1.0falsefalse
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 08:14, 14 July 2020 | 1,275 × 1,650, 128 pages (3.17 MB) | Fæ (talk | contribs) | FEDLINK - United States Federal Collection analysisofopromo1094564906 (User talk:Fæ/IA books#Fork8) (batch 1993-2020 #6599) |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
The following page uses this file:
File usage on other wikis
The following other wikis use this file:
- Usage on nl.wikipedia.org
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Author | D'Ambrosio, Michele Contractor, SRS |
---|---|
Short title | ANALYSIS OF O-5 PROMOTION AND RETENTION FOR NAVAL URL OFFICERS |
File change date and time | 05:55, 15 April 2020 |
Date and time of digitizing | 00:47, 19 March 2020 |
Date metadata was last modified | 05:55, 15 April 2020 |
Software used | Adobe Acrobat Pro 2017 17.11.30166 |
Conversion program | Adobe Acrobat Pro 2017 17.11.30166 |
Encrypted | no |
Page size | 612 x 792 pts (letter) |
Version of PDF format | 1.4 |