File:A FEASIBILITY ASSESSMENT AND ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES OF WEARABLE AND NON-WEARABLE COCKPIT BIOMETRICS ABOARD FIGHTER CLASS AIRCRAFT (IA afeasibilityasse1094564918).pdf

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Go to page
next page →
next page →
next page →

Original file(1,275 × 1,650 pixels, file size: 2.07 MB, MIME type: application/pdf, 164 pages)

Captions

Captions

Add a one-line explanation of what this file represents

Summary[edit]

A FEASIBILITY ASSESSMENT AND ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES OF WEARABLE AND NON-WEARABLE COCKPIT BIOMETRICS ABOARD FIGHTER CLASS AIRCRAFT   (Wikidata search (Cirrus search) Wikidata query (SPARQL)  Create new Wikidata item based on this file)
Author
Lambert, Emily L.
Nguyen, Jacob D.
Noronha, Sean J.
Rodriguez, Moises J.
Saint-Fleur, Marc A.
Sebacher, Kristina L.
Travis, Jazmine C.
image of artwork listed in title parameter on this page
Title
A FEASIBILITY ASSESSMENT AND ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES OF WEARABLE AND NON-WEARABLE COCKPIT BIOMETRICS ABOARD FIGHTER CLASS AIRCRAFT
Publisher
Monterey, CA; Naval Postgraduate School
Description

Physiological episodes (PEs)continue to be a top safety concern for aviators across the United States Navy and United States Air Force. At their worst, PEs can result in catastrophic outcomes for aviators and aircraft. The team sought to identify short- and long-term solutions utilizing commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) and proprietary devices that provide both environmental and aircrew physiological measurements in real time and post-flight necessary to identify PEs. The team sought out readily available devices, along with researching Naval Air Systems Command devices in development that could potentially fulfill requirements for critical measurements necessary for accurate data analysis. A MATLAB algorithm was developed to show all suitable solutions and consisted of both COTS and non-COTS devices, which allowed for the critical measurements to be collected. The team recommends two multi-device COTS solutions for short-term implementation and a combination of COTS and six non-COTS solutions for long-term implementation.


Subjects: biometric; fighter; physiological episode; cockpit; data; aircraft operations
Language English
Publication date March 2020
Current location
IA Collections: navalpostgraduateschoollibrary; fedlink
Accession number
afeasibilityasse1094564918
Source
Internet Archive identifier: afeasibilityasse1094564918
https://archive.org/download/afeasibilityasse1094564918/afeasibilityasse1094564918.pdf
Permission
(Reusing this file)
This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. Copyright protection is not available for this work in the United States.

Licensing[edit]

Public domain
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work prepared by an officer or employee of the United States Government as part of that person’s official duties under the terms of Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 105 of the US Code. Note: This only applies to original works of the Federal Government and not to the work of any individual U.S. state, territory, commonwealth, county, municipality, or any other subdivision. This template also does not apply to postage stamp designs published by the United States Postal Service since 1978. (See § 313.6(C)(1) of Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices). It also does not apply to certain US coins; see The US Mint Terms of Use.

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current01:27, 14 July 2020Thumbnail for version as of 01:27, 14 July 20201,275 × 1,650, 164 pages (2.07 MB) (talk | contribs)FEDLINK - United States Federal Collection afeasibilityasse1094564918 (User talk:Fæ/IA books#Fork8) (batch 1993-2020 #5674)

Metadata