File:A FEASIBILITY ASSESSMENT AND ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES OF WEARABLE AND NON-WEARABLE COCKPIT BIOMETRICS ABOARD FIGHTER CLASS AIRCRAFT (IA afeasibilityasse1094564918).pdf
Original file (1,275 × 1,650 pixels, file size: 2.07 MB, MIME type: application/pdf, 164 pages)
Captions
Summary[edit]
A FEASIBILITY ASSESSMENT AND ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES OF WEARABLE AND NON-WEARABLE COCKPIT BIOMETRICS ABOARD FIGHTER CLASS AIRCRAFT ( ) | ||
---|---|---|
Author |
|
|
Title |
A FEASIBILITY ASSESSMENT AND ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES OF WEARABLE AND NON-WEARABLE COCKPIT BIOMETRICS ABOARD FIGHTER CLASS AIRCRAFT |
|
Publisher |
Monterey, CA; Naval Postgraduate School |
|
Description |
Physiological episodes (PEs)continue to be a top safety concern for aviators across the United States Navy and United States Air Force. At their worst, PEs can result in catastrophic outcomes for aviators and aircraft. The team sought to identify short- and long-term solutions utilizing commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) and proprietary devices that provide both environmental and aircrew physiological measurements in real time and post-flight necessary to identify PEs. The team sought out readily available devices, along with researching Naval Air Systems Command devices in development that could potentially fulfill requirements for critical measurements necessary for accurate data analysis. A MATLAB algorithm was developed to show all suitable solutions and consisted of both COTS and non-COTS devices, which allowed for the critical measurements to be collected. The team recommends two multi-device COTS solutions for short-term implementation and a combination of COTS and six non-COTS solutions for long-term implementation. Subjects: biometric; fighter; physiological episode; cockpit; data; aircraft operations |
|
Language | English | |
Publication date | March 2020 | |
Current location |
IA Collections: navalpostgraduateschoollibrary; fedlink |
|
Accession number |
afeasibilityasse1094564918 |
|
Source | ||
Permission (Reusing this file) |
This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. Copyright protection is not available for this work in the United States. |
Licensing[edit]
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse |
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work prepared by an officer or employee of the United States Government as part of that person’s official duties under the terms of Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 105 of the US Code.
Note: This only applies to original works of the Federal Government and not to the work of any individual U.S. state, territory, commonwealth, county, municipality, or any other subdivision. This template also does not apply to postage stamp designs published by the United States Postal Service since 1978. (See § 313.6(C)(1) of Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices). It also does not apply to certain US coins; see The US Mint Terms of Use.
|
||
This file has been identified as being free of known restrictions under copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights. |
https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/PDMCreative Commons Public Domain Mark 1.0falsefalse
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 01:27, 14 July 2020 | 1,275 × 1,650, 164 pages (2.07 MB) | Fæ (talk | contribs) | FEDLINK - United States Federal Collection afeasibilityasse1094564918 (User talk:Fæ/IA books#Fork8) (batch 1993-2020 #5674) |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
The following page uses this file:
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Author | D'Ambrosio, Michele Contractor, SRS |
---|---|
Short title | A FEASIBILITY ASSESSMENT AND ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES OF WEARABLE AND NON-WEARABLE COCKPIT BIOMETRICS ABOARD FIGHTER CLASS AIRCRAFT |
File change date and time | 06:21, 8 May 2020 |
Date and time of digitizing | 03:43, 31 March 2020 |
Date metadata was last modified | 06:21, 8 May 2020 |
Software used | Adobe Acrobat Pro 2017 17.11.30166 |
Conversion program | Adobe Acrobat Pro 2017 17.11.30166 |
Encrypted | no |
Page size |
|
Version of PDF format | 1.4 |