File:Comparison of expert judgment methods used for modernization decision- the case of MiG-29 (IA comparisonofexpe00zaha).pdf

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Go to page
next page →
next page →
next page →

Original file ‎(1,216 × 1,606 pixels, file size: 6.26 MB, MIME type: application/pdf, 136 pages)

Captions

Captions

Add a one-line explanation of what this file represents

Summary[edit]

Comparison of expert judgment methods used for modernization decision: the case of MiG-29   (Wikidata search (Cirrus search) Wikidata query (SPARQL)  Create new Wikidata item based on this file)
Author
Zahainov, Vassyl M.
image of artwork listed in title parameter on this page
Title
Comparison of expert judgment methods used for modernization decision: the case of MiG-29
Publisher
Monterey, California: Naval Postgraduate School;Springfield, Va.: Available from National Technical Information Service
Description
Thesis advisor(s): Hildebrandt, Gregory; Franck, Raymond
"June 2000."
Thesis (M.S. in International Resource Planning and Management) Naval Postgraduate School, June 2000
Includes bibliographical references (p. 111-112)
This research analyzes two approaches to the economic evaluation of an aircraft modernization program. The Analytic Science Corporation (TASC) method is compared with the Logical Decision for Window (LDW) methodology. TASCFORM-AIR model is a method to quantitatively measure military force modernization. Logical Decisions for Windows software and methodology is based on Multiattribute Utility Theory. It also helps to evaluate decisions quantitatively. The research includes analysis of the reasons, constraints and tendencies in the modern aircraft modernization process. Weapon modernization is usually driven by several objectives, all of them in one way or an another are pertinent to resource allocation. Reliable analytical tools are important to make good decision. Cost- effectiveness and cost utility approaches are evaluated. Comparison of both methodologies is based on the MiG-29 modernization situational model. TASCFORM-AIR Model provides static indicators of military force potential. This can be viewed as measures of effectiveness. The LDW program computes the alternatives' utility by combining its measure levels based on the analyst's preferences. The results produced in both cases are useful in several ways
Mode of access: World Wide Web
System requirements: Adobe Acrobat reader
Ukranian Air Force author
dk/dk cc:9116 9/18/00

Subjects:
Language en_US
Publication date 1 June 2000
Current location
IA Collections: navalpostgraduateschoollibrary; fedlink; americana
Accession number
comparisonofexpe00zaha
Authority file  OCLC: 1042474650
Source
Internet Archive identifier: comparisonofexpe00zaha
https://archive.org/download/comparisonofexpe00zaha/comparisonofexpe00zaha.pdf

Licensing[edit]

Public domain
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work prepared by an officer or employee of the United States Government as part of that person’s official duties under the terms of Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 105 of the US Code. Note: This only applies to original works of the Federal Government and not to the work of any individual U.S. state, territory, commonwealth, county, municipality, or any other subdivision. This template also does not apply to postage stamp designs published by the United States Postal Service since 1978. (See § 313.6(C)(1) of Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices). It also does not apply to certain US coins; see The US Mint Terms of Use.
This file has been identified as being free of known restrictions under copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights.

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current04:39, 16 July 2020Thumbnail for version as of 04:39, 16 July 20201,216 × 1,606, 136 pages (6.26 MB)Fæ (talk | contribs)FEDLINK - United States Federal Collection comparisonofexpe00zaha (User talk:Fæ/IA books#Fork8) (batch 1993-2020 #11857)

You cannot overwrite this file.

Metadata

This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Comparison_of_expert_judgment_methods_used_for_modernization_decision-_the_case_of_MiG-29_(IA_comparisonofexpe00zaha).pdf&oldid=866705903"